Cheap Web Hosting provided by Dayana Host

 The Weimar Republic De Ja Vous:  In Just a Little While Your Money in the Bank Will be Worthless!!

Do You Know What the Weimar Republic Was? 

What Value is There in LOOKING BACK INTO THE PAST?

McClathy news on Yahoo today, (6/1/2009) says that Obama had to reverse his decision to make public the detainee abuse photos from Abu Ghraib, because Iraqi Prime Minister, Maliki warned that Iraq would erupt into violence at the revelations and would demand that American troops leave Iraq sooner.  This is being used as an excuse.  If that would make Iraqis erupt, why wouldn't they erupt after Obama reassured the interrogators that they would not pay for their crimes?  The Iraqis would simmer down once President Obama signally punished the non-Americans who did such things--even to the raping of victims.  Was this to make detainees talk and reveal secrets?

Those abuses were mere practice runs for what is coming to AMERICA!

ATTENTION!  Received email on 5/23/2009 showing that many other countries are following like a wave printing more and more of their currency.  This will cause hyper-inflation.  It is a worldwide problem!

If you would like to receive the emails I have been receiving from a bunch of very remarkable men who predicted years ago the dire economic circumstances the world is in today and who have been warning and sending red flags to the Federal Government about it and were ignored, please heed this instruction:

Some believe that because prophecy states there will be laws passed that will prevent God's people from buying and selling, critical information about what is happening with the economies where they live and abroad are irrelevant.  This is incorrect.  After a major collapse there will be a time period before such restrictions come where God's people can decide what to do with their money for emergency situations and for the spreading of God's work.  We recommend that you be very cautious about your financial decisions, for, during that very collapse all your dollars would become useless automatically if it is left in the bank before such laws to restrict buying and selling are passed.

If you would like to receive these free and very important emails, please sign up on the website, www.moneyandmarkets.com, and then also sign up for the new ezine called, "Uncommon Wisdom."  Sign up at www.uncommonwisdomdaily.com.  These two publications are related.

In Just a Little While, a Free and Global People Will be Very Hotly Mad at their Own Governments and Churches!  YOUR MONEY IN THE BANK WILL SOON BE WORTHLESS!

Why should they be angry?  More than likely because no one would warn them that their life's work and savings would be destroyed!  After that will follow unbelievable dangers and TERROR!

The Weimar Republic was a case-scenario regime of history that underwent many horrific problems.  One major particular problem of note with her WAS HER FINANCIAL PROBLEMS.  By going back into history and looking, we may discover ourselves heading the same way.

GOING BACK INTO THE PAST!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090417/
ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/torture_memos_26

Obama: No charges for harsh CIA interrogation  Thu Apr 16, 9:33pm ET

United States Attorney General Eric Holder addresses attendees during a dinner

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama absolved CIA officers from prosecution for harsh, painful interrogation of terror suspects Thursday, even as his administration released Bush-era memos graphically detailing — and authorizing — such grim tactics as slamming detainees against walls, waterboarding them and keeping them naked and cold for long periods.

Human rights groups and many Obama officials have condemned such methods as torture. Bush officials have vigorously disagreed.

In releasing the documents, the most comprehensive accounting yet of interrogation methods that were among the Bush administrations most closely guarded secrets, Obama said he wanted to move beyond "a dark and painful chapter in our history."

On the other side, human rights advocates argued that Obama should not have assured the CIA that officers who conducted interrogations would not be prosecuted if they used methods authorized by Bush lawyers in the memos.

Obama disagreed, saying in a statement, "Nothing will be gained by spending our time and energy laying blame for the past."

[Isn't it a shame that Osama Bin Laden attacked America "in the past?"  Is this saying that Osama must not be punished?  It must be, BECAUSE OSAMA IS STILL NOT PUNISHED NOR PURSUED, AND THERE IS STILL NO REAL INTENTION FOR HIM TO BE PURSUED EXCEPT IN THE NEW AGE OF THE GREAT AMERICAN LIE!  All can see that Osama Bin Laden had a big part in forming that long fought for New World Order.  Propagandists on the internet can't understand what we're saying when we tell them to urge Bush to go after Osama.  They easily and eagerly told us we are traitors to America, though.

Remember when President Bush, urged to stage an immediate independent investigation of the 911 tragedy, opposed it saying it would divert resources necessary for the war on terror?  Now President Obama is talking about "time and energy" diverted into laying blame for the past.  Do you have any idea how many criminals even in jail are exonerated by what he is saying?  Do you know how many even pending murder cases are made void here?  DO ANY OF YOU REALIZE THAT A MAJOR MEANS IN THE FUTURE OF PUTTING YOU TO DEATH WILL BE YOUR COMPUTERS AND WHAT YOU PLACED ON IT IN "THE PAST?"

A quick trip down memory's lane recalls that after America stepped in to push back the Iraqi regime from their assault upon Kuwait, the tables were then turned and the Kuwaiti people struck back against the Iraqi soldiers.  Some of the Iraqi soldiers were put in prison, and in one televised newscast, one of the soldiers was asked by angry Kuwaitis if and why he abused and tortured Kuwaiti citizens.  He replied that he did abuse them, saying, "We are soldiers.  We do what we're told!"

Universally the argument of that soldier was condemned.  America condemned him for his argument at that time, and brought out the position that a person is responsible for the crimes that he knowingly commits when in competent conditions even if he is ordered to commit them by his superiors.

It's the same thing like even Jews who were offered their lives and other possible rewards for helping the Nazis to kill other Jews or to dispose of their bodies.  There was a consistent American message for all such, and that message was that they're responsible for their crimes nonetheless.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-04-20-demjanjuk_N.htm?csp=24&RM_Exclude=Juno

John Demjanjuk threatened to be deported to face trial in Germany for his actions as a guard in a Nazi death camp!  [Something long, long ago, "from the past" should be ignored?]

CINCINNATI (AP) — The Justice Department is asking a federal appeals court to dismiss a stay of deportation to Germany for alleged death camp guard John Demjanjuk.  [A man who, IN HISTORY, did what he was told.]

The government says in a brief filed in a federal appeals court Monday that Demjanjuk's attorneys won the emergency stay last week by arguing that a motion before the Board of Immigration Appeals in Falls Church, Virginia, had yet to be considered.

The board on Thursday denied Demjanjuk's request to reopen the case.

The 89-year-old suburban Cleveland man is facing an arrest warrant in Germany that accuses him of working as a guard in 1943 at a death camp in Nazi-occupied Poland.

To prove how this can work would be inquiries as to whether or not the CIA interrogators did anything to show how much they disagreed with the Bush Administration and how poorly they did their jobs.  For example: a person who is terrible at lying would show visible signs of a lack of comfort or calmness when he or she is compelled to lie.  Was that the case with these interrogators when it comes to torture?  Did they try to write letters of objection or show some sign that torturing people was not an expertise that they were born into? 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090421/
ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_does_torture_work
When the CIA decided to use waterboarding — a tactic that simulates drowning — officials ended up using it far more than intended. Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded at least 82 times in August 2002, the documents said. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the admitted mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, was waterboarded 183 times in March 2003.

"You keep thinking, 'Maybe one more time, and one more time," Rejali said, explaining how interrogators ramp up their methods even as their effectiveness wanes.

[Torture was half the tale.  Our military personnelle also raped and forced their victims to commit sex acts upon them.  Their superiors commanded them to do that?

EVERYTHING THE IRAQIS SUFFERED FROM WITH THAT FALSE AND TREASONOUS WAR IS COMING TO AMERICA TO AFFLICT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EVEN WORSE!  AT THAT TIME THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL ALL KNOW AND UNDERSTAND THAT THEY DESERVE IT.

One thing that surely couldn't teach these interrogators anything was the Constitution of the United States and its history of protecting us from Middle Eastern Muslim terrorists.  It protected us merely on the virtue of its command to have nothing to do with the squabbles between Arab and Jew ALONE!  Even after we had to disobey it on this point, like with every other, and then not know why we're falling, it still protected us largely until 2001.  We are finding out now why it can't protect us anymore: the people trusted to protect it, hate it!]

Did they do their jobs poorly so that the detainees were not that much harmed?  Or did they do their jobs very well, showing they are a home-grown brand of Americans that should not be here?

What then about the Abu Ghraib prison scandal?  The prisoners were tortured there also, and the persecutors had a ball doing that with pictures taken!  Who then were they interrogating?  The Bush Administration told them to take the pictures?  Or is there some clue somewhere that America is infiltrated with people who have the same hearts as their worst historical wartime enemies?]
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/
lewrw/archives/026571.html

WARREN BUFFETT Says that Obama is taking the right course in bailing out the banks.  David Palmer, on May 2, 2009 asks him when in his financial career did he consider throwing money to bankrupt investments...

In this latest news story, Warren Buffett says:
...the U.S. government is generally taking the right actions to help the economy recover, and it should be given some benefit of the doubt because officials have been reacting in the middle of a crisis.

"Overall, I commend the actions that were taken," Buffett said."

My two questions for Warren Buffett are:

(1) In your lifetime, how many companiesı have you invested in when they were on the verge of bankruptcy? (We all know the answer to this one: None. Buffett is the world's foremost value investor.)

(2) If you consider this a poor investment strategy for your own portfolio, why is it to be commended when the United States Gunvernment does it?
__________________________
ıI'm sure it's just a "coincidence" that some of the companies that Buffet recently bought shares in (e.g., General Electric and Goldman Sachs) are candidates for the gunvernment bailouts which he commends.

I know how I would feel if catastrophe hits and I get caught while people were given special information and warning about that same catastrophe and they said nothing to benefit me or to give me warning as a brother.  Yet that is exactly what is happening today.  I personally, put myself in the shoes of those who don't have a clue about what is going on, and then I get indignant at those who know but are not saying anything.  Although the wealth of thousands of Americans is about to be erased, there is hardly a mention of anything about this even in the churches.  Church members are being taught that there will be no consequences for this: for having advanced knowledge of increasing horrible events, and then yet passing off the responsibility of alerting their brothers and sisters in the free world.

A couple of days ago the news reported that President Obama made public details of the kinds of torture that were used by CIA agents upon terrorism suspects.  At the same time he assured those agents that they will not pay for their crimes.  He said they would not be punished because the former Administration told them to do it. 

Obama said it was a "dark and painful chapter in our history" as an excuse to overlook making any corrections.  One problem to this scenario is, how long ago was that history?  Was it a time when America was much different from now?  Maybe he can find out if he understands whether or not the Bush Administration REALIZES THE ERRORS OF ITS WAYS AND NOW REPUDIATES SUCH ACTIONS.  For if the people who occupied the Bush Administration still maintains those policies, is it true that everything that is "dark" and "painful" is really "HISTORY?"  Why is it "history" when it is even clear that Dick Cheney is presently warning President Obama that he's making America unsafe even today by going back to the principles of the Constitution of the United States that protected America for well over 200 years from Middle Eastern Muslim terrorists, who, "hate us because we are free?"  Cheney is still warning Obama not to move away from the tactics Nazis used for security.  In this he is urging President Obama not to transform America away from the radical 100% wrong Bush America and make it like it has always been throughout its history.  It is very, very clear here, coupled with the atrocities that took place at the Abu Ghraib prison that did not specifically deal with the importance of asking the prisoners questions, that what we're talking about is not HISTORY.  To a certain group of people, torturing others is a way of life and religion.

Please remember that this is what we were talking about in our disputes with a Jesuit who called himself "Doug."  He was very upset at us for being upset with and for exposing his friends on the internet who boldly posted that all who were not Catholic should be persecuted and killed.  He entered telling us that we must ignore these people and re-center our efforts into attacking much more dangerous people called, "Abortionists."  In the process of this and our acclaiming that it was important to look into history so we can know what is going on all around us, he proclaimed that we must not do this.  He said that a holocaust was right now underway, and that this was caused "by concentrating on the past." 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzcFpB4zkUs
Keith Olbermann tells us the obvious about why people must look at history and correct all wrongs made therein.  He pointedly gives advice to then President-elect Barrack Obama, who, already, is telling the world that correcting the mistakes of the most tragic 8 years ever in American history is not something in the best interest of America.

Therefore, if President Obama doesn't listen, he will join the hordes of people who keep giving the American people assurances as they ignore all of history in making plans they claim that will secure America, proving that, even if they are 100% wrong, they have no consequences personally to fear:  ONLY A FREE PEOPLE AND THEIR CHILDREN ALWAYS PAY!

They keep making assurances and promises every day and are wrong every day and 100% of the time.  The worst assurance they always make compared to their plans for martial law in the United States, is that FREEDOM will be preserved!

 

The question was again why the Jews demand that we never forget about the Holocaust that took place in Germany under the Nazi regime?  THEY INSIST ON THIS IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE IT DOESN'T HAPPEN AGAIN!  Why then does "Doug" insist that we should forget the past?  The answer is because HE WANTS THOSE ATROCITIES OR SIMILAR TO HAPPEN AGAIN!  His actual preference IS FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO OPERATE LIKE THAT.  He covers these desires over with an outwardly scrupulous crusade to save the lives of babies against abortion.

America, or rather, former President Bush, said he was bringing in a new concept.  It was actually a concept that was new only to a free America.  It was called, "pre-emptive war."  As you can see, the Democratic party has never ever addressed the issue about how wrong that policy was, nor what it has cost.  So today a frequent phrase used by President Obama is, "Let's move forward."  He is telling us we must not look to the past.  Again, the question of why not.  The reason why we must not do that nor correct the horrible tragedies especially caused by president Bush...

IS BECAUSE AMERICA HAS EVERY INTENTION OF  REPEATING THOSE TRAGEDIES!  She is at the forefront of creating a New World Order.  That government that is approaching HAS TO HAVE THE FREEDOM TO DO JUST WHAT FORMER PRESIDENT GW BUSH DID:  CARRY OUT WARS AT ITS OWN WILL AND ARBITRARILY.  That's why it was easily seen that the Democratic Congress is involved in the very treason President Bush has been pushing.  They cannot correct those "mistakes" of the past, because the future will contain much more of those "mistakes."

NOTE:  Remember our expose of the Patriot Act where internet propagandists saw bold death threats against all who were not Catholic but refused to condemn them?  Remember we found out they refused to condemn those threats because the government is recording all our thoughts on the internet at least in order to punish those who presently have thoughts that might threaten the new tyranny?  Well it sure is getting to appear that no one can, with impunity, attack the future accepted principle of pre-emptive or "preventive" war Adolf Hitler supported and which former President George Bush boldly performed.  America, however, can never be healed of her wounds unless the mistakes of the past are addressed and resolved.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfSDPY5rYZE
The tragedy of the Weimar Republic before it transformed into the Nazi Regime.  It suffered hyper-inflation by, when running out of money, proceeding to print much more of it in order to satisfy their debt for war reparations.  Then, from a time when it took 4 German Marks to equal 1 US dollar, it evolved into 4.2 TRILLION German Marks equaling 1 US dollar.  If you were a millionaire owner of German Marks before the trouble started, you couldn't afford to buy a bottle of soap bubbles to blow at parties afterward.

 

We have already made mention that there are books out that graphically detail the fact that strange circumstances that led up to the creation of the Nazi Regime are being repeated in American life and politics in ways unbelievable.  One of those books is, "The Ominous Parallels" by Dr. Norman Peikov.  From psychology techniques to security principles, this is just one book giving warnings that history is repeating, BUT NOT A GOOD HISTORY.

Well now we see a financial parallel in America imitating the German government just before the Nazi Regime was firmly established.  We are talking about the Weimar Republic [Vai-mar]. 

The Weimar Republic ran out of money to pay back agreed-to war reparations.  They therefore figured out a solution to the problem we are now adopting.  In this case it is not that they voluntarily got themselves into debt.  They were being punished for causing World War I.  America, on the other hand today, is voluntarily pushing forward to fight a crisis caused by rampant excess, rampant debt and rampant questionable and risky borrowing by borrowing more and spending more.  The people who are doing this in support of the Obama plan are asking the more prudent how they can prove that the Obama plan would not work with all of history looking at them.

As explained by the Wikipedia free encyclopedia about the dilemma of the Weimar Republic:

By 1923, the Republic claimed it could no longer afford the reparations payments required by the Versailles Treaty, and the government defaulted on some payments. In response, French and Belgian troops occupied the Ruhr region, Germany's most productive industrial region at the time, taking control of most mining and manufacturing companies in January 1923. Strikes were called, and passive resistance was encouraged. These strikes lasted eight months, further damaging the economy and increasing the expense of imports. The strike meant no goods were being produced. This infuriated the French, who began to kill and exile protestors in the region.

Since striking workers were paid benefits by the state, much additional currency was printed, fueling a period of hyperinflation. The 1920s German inflation started when Germany had no goods with which to trade. The government printed money to deal with the crisis; this allowed Germany to pay war loans and reparations with worthless marks, and helped formerly great industrialists to pay back their own loans. This also led to pay raises for workers and for businessmen who wanted to profit from it. Circulation of money rocketed, and soon the Germans discovered their money was worthless. The value of the Papiermark had declined from 4.2 per US dollar at the outbreak of World War I to 1 million per dollar by August 1923. This gave the Republic's opponents something else to criticise it for. On 15 November 1923, a new currency, the Rentenmark, was introduced at the rate of 1 trillion (1,000,000,000,000) Papiermark for 1 Rentenmark, an action known as a monetary reset. At that time, 1 U.S. dollar was equal to 4.2 Rentenmark. Reparation payments resumed, and the Ruhr was returned to Germany under the Locarno Pact, which defined a border between Germany, France and Belgium.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xphzHqcLvNs&feature=related
Alan Keyes:  SEE THE ACTUAL TEXT OF WHAT WAS SPOKEN ON THE VIDEO BELOW, HERE

What then happened if a German citizen had a million marks in the bank.  It used to be worth something, but by 1923 it was barely worth a millionth of what it formerly was worth.  No German citizen was able to buy a single loaf of bread with it.  The problem we are facing here is that President Obama is following the same general mistake with no respect whatsoever for history.  That is why Ambassador Alan Keyes pointed out a time when it was understood that America was so much in debt that it no longer had any money.  He then remarked how and why they were talking about 2 Trillion dollars to spend for bailouts within the previous six months.  It is quite obvious when all the money is gone, President Obama is going to have much more of it printed.

To make you more understand what is happening, then consider:

The American forefathers were opposed to using paper money and wanted America to deal exclusively with hard currency of precious metals or other such tangible things.  Paper money, of itself, is only worth paper with ink printed on it.  What the Weimar Republic did when it ran out of money was take note of its contractual agreements to pay in German Marks BY PRINTING MORE OF IT IN PAPER MONEY.  The countries it was then making the payments to were being shafted, but the contract was being met.  It would have been different if the Weimar Republic were required to make payment in gold or other precious metals.  You can print more paper money, because it is paper, representing something else: its worth in hard currency, or more particularly, gold.  You can create much more of these representative notes called German Marks, much like the US government can do with their notes called dollars.  BUT YOU CAN'T PRINT MORE GOLD THAT THESE NOTES REPRESENT.  If more and more notes representing the fixed amount of gold owned are printed, then the value of each note goes down.  You can say it is worth its weight in gold.

If you had a marble platform held up by 1600 strong marble columns underneath it, each column would be worth much less to the benefit of the platform than if there were just two columns.  If you had 1600 columns, one thing for sure is that, you can kick down a number of them and suffer no ill effects.  If there were two columns holding up a marble platform and you kicked down one of them, you know big trouble will follow.

That's what happened in the Weimar Republic.  So much paper money was put into circulation that people had to have wheelbarrows full of worthless cash just to buy a loaf of bread or to even be paid their wages.  Children were seen playing with the worthless bills, stacking them up to play games with.  Others just simply burned much of the worthless notes.  We are giving you an idea of what is about to happen to your savings in the bank, and why it will all likely happen very suddenly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1LfosS2YPg

America used to always punish anyone who engages in war crimes and then claims that they abused, tortured and killed people because their superiors told them to do it!

In this video, Keith Olbermann tries to make some kind of sense over this new issue the United States is transforming into.

 

On this website we showed you several different financial experts and investors even giving you tips on which banks you can trust to hold your money for you.  Our advice is different from these experts.  We are not putting them down.  We acknowledge that they are a great deal more knowledgeable in these affairs than we are.  The crucial difference however between us and them IS THAT THEY ARE GIVING YOU ADVICE BASED UPON THE IDEA THAT OUR NATIONAL LEADERS ARE STRUGGLING TO HELP YOU AND STRUGGLING TO SAVE YOUR NATION AND STRUGGLING TO MAKE YOU MORE PROSPEROUS.  We believe our advice to take your monies out of the banks and markets is more valuable because of the fact that our national leaders ARE NOT TRYING TO HELP YOU OR MAKE YOU PROSPEROUS, but are trying to destroy your wealth and betray you into a global regime.

They are already talking about a New World Order and a new currency within it.  If they want this New World Order and new currency that bad to even betray the American people just by forming these things in secret, wouldn't it be much easier to accomplish this by destroying the value of the dollar?  Remember, it is not precious metals or gold that is stored in our banks: it is units of paper notes that are supposed to represent its weight in gold.

The problem we are noticing is that as America is falling, most of those involved in the capitulation are living life as if nothing is happening in order to lull all of you into doing the same so that it hits you unprepared.  With that is the documentation here we are trying to tell you!

THE CRISIS ABOUT TO COME WILL BE VASTLY DIFFERENT THAN OTHER CRISES OF AMERICAN HISTORY!  Even to the great blackout that took place in New York City in 1965.  At that time people were helping people, and it was as if the blackout more brought people together than pulled them apart.  What is being planned here is FAR DIFFERENT, involving mass exterminations.  In 1965 we had no laws stating that our national leaders can even own your wives and property and do what they want with them in the event of a major national emergency.  We had no laws stating that the Constitution is suspended if Osama Bin Laden's father wanted to urge us to attack no-fly-zones.  Today, among the first directives in the event of a national emergency is to, in advance, round up people protesting all the secret plans for the New World Order and martial law.  Another directive is to take our politicians and the members of Congress to a safe place.  They do know and have known for a long, long time that they are angering alot of people, but that is clearly not their concern.

From this we are trying to show you how everything revolved to this.  The question is: exactly what happens when our national leaders are proven to be wrong, even when their errors cause the loss of thousands of generations of innocent lives.  We already saw with the Bush administration.  Not a single blush took place, and it is quite clear even the reason why he was not afraid for causing the deaths ("accidentally") of so many people all as a result of deliberately ignoring the plainest history and forming American war policy and security policy after the communists and the Nazis.  Members of Congress and the judiciary all turn a blind eye.  We have already taught our national leaders that making the most blunderous mistakes, even with the claim of "looking forward" or experimenting, with no regard for the message history gives against such actions only causes true Americans and the Republic to suffer.  Isn't it only logical that they would not be in treason if they had some idea that they would suffer for it?  Isn't it only logical that GW Bush would never have formed American security policy after the communists and Nazis if he did not know that members of the other branches of government and the military also inwardly had such ideas and would not punish him for it?  We already gave them the message that they can do anything they want.  It is now to the point where it is too late.  President Bush even bought property in the South American country of Paraquay, famous for being a haven for war criminals and Nazis.  On securing that property, he made an agreement with that country not to prosecute him for war crimes.  It is now perfectly clear that he doesn't even have to flee there.

What happened to all the big mouths who fought the people that struggled to stop America from making the mistake of starting a war against no-fly-zones in Iraq?  What happened to the size of the mouths of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and others?  What happened to the size of the mouths of the Bush propagandists all over the internet who followed the example of their fathers in Nazi Germany and the former Soviet Union to constantly mentally diagnose people as waco, loony and insane for disagreeing with their positions, but who yet turned out to be wrong about Iraq not having weapons of mass destruction?  It is because we don't understand these people why we are about to be destroyed.  Sean Hannity's mouth got bigger.  Rush Limbaugh's got bigger.  All the internet propagandists who mentally diagnosed us before we were proven correct about Iraq, now give us more mental diagnoses than ever before.  We are the ones who feared black helicopters and not no-fly-zones.

THE PROBLEM WAS NEVER INCOMPETENCE!

THE PROBLEM WAS ALWAYS FASCISM!

YOU NEED TO TAKE YOUR DOLLARS OUT OF THE BANKS AND MARKETS AND BUY HARD CURRENCY.  There are drawbacks to this.  You will have to study the situation out.  With what is going on however, your worst option is to follow the popular majority route and leave your monies there.

 

 

 

Table Of Contents