George W. Bush's 50 greatest accomplishments THAT MAKES THE CURRENT PRESIDENTIAL RACE SO CLOSE AND SO DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE!:


1. I attacked and took over two countries.
2. I spent the US surplus and bankrupted the US treasury.
3. I shattered the record for the biggest annual deficit in history (not easy)
4. I set an economic record for the most personal bankruptcies filed in any 12 month period.
5. I set all-time record for the biggest drop in the history of the stock market.
6. I am the first president in decades to execute a federal prisoner.
7. I am the first president in US history to enter office with a criminal record.
8. In my first year in office I set the all-time record for the most days on vacation by any president
in US history. (Tough to beat my dad's, but I did)
9. After taking the entire month of August off for vacation, I presided over the worst security failure in US history.
10. I set the record for most campaign-raising trips by a president in US history.
11. In my first two years in office over 2 million Americans lost their jobs.
12. I cut unemployment benefits for more out-of-work Americans than any other president in US history.
13. I set the all-time record for most real estate foreclosures in a 12-month period.
14. I appointed more convicted criminals to administration positions than any other president in US history.
15. I set the record for fewest press conferences of any president since the advent of TV.
16. I presided over the biggest energy crises in US history and refused to intervene when corruption was revealed.
17. I signed more laws and executive orders amending the Constitution than any other US president in history.
18. I cut health-care benefits for war veterans.
19. I set the all-time record for the most people worldwide to simultaneously take to the streets to protest against me
(15 million people) shattering the record for protest against any person in the history of mankind.
20. I dissolved more international treaties than any president in US history.
21. I've made my presidency the most secretive and unaccountable of any in US history.
22. Members of my cabinet are the richest of any administration in US history. (The poorest mulitmillionaire,
Condoleeza Rice, has a Chevron oil tanker named after her and doesn't have to cook rice ever again!)
23. I am the first president in US history to have all 50 states of the union simultaneously struggle against bankruptcy.
24. I presided over the biggest corporate stock market fraud in any market in any country in the history of the world.
25. I am the first president in US history to order a US attack and military occupation of a sovereign nation,
and I did so against the will of the United Nations and the vast majority of the international community.
26. I have created the largest government department bureaucracy in the history of the US.
27. I set the all-time record for biggest annual budget spending increases, more than any other president in US history
(Reagan was hard to beat, but I did it!!!)
28. I am the first president in US history to compel the United Nations to remove the US from the Human Rights Commission.
29. I am the first president in US history to have the United Nations remove the US from Elections Monitoring Board.
30. I removed more checks and balances and have the least congressional oversight of any presidential
administration in US history.
31. I rendered the entire United Nations irrelevant.
32. I withdrew from the World Court Of Law.
33. I refused to allow inspectors access to US prisoners of war and by default I no longer abide by the Geneva Conventions.
34. I am the first president in US history to refuse United Nations election inspectors access during the 2002 elections.
35. I am the all-time US (and world) record holder for the most corporate campaign donations.
36. The biggest lifetime contributor to my campaign, who is also one of my best friends, presided over one of the
largest corporate bankruptcy frauds in world history (Kenneth Lay, former CEO of Enron Corporation).
37. I spent more money on polls and focus groups than any president in US history.
38. I am the first president to run and hide when the US came under attack (and then lied, saying the enemy had the code to Air Force 1).
39. I am the first US president to establish a secret shadow government.
40. I took the world's sympathy for the US after 9/11, and in less than a year made the US the most resented country in the world (possibly the biggest diplomatic failure in US and world history).
41. I am the first US president in history to have a majority of the people of Europe (71%) view my presidency as the biggest threat to world peace and stability.
42. I changed US policy to allow convicted criminals to be awarded government contracts.
43. I set the all-time record for the number of administration appointees who violated US laws by not selling their huge investments in corporations that later made bids for government contracts.
44. I have removed more freedoms and civil liberties for Americans than any other president in US history.
45. I have created the most divided country in decades, possibly the most divided that the US has been since the Civil War.
46. I entered office with the strongest economy in US history and in less than two years turned every single economic category heading straight down. RECORDS AND REFERENCES.
47. I have at least one conviction for drunk driving in Maine (Texas driving record has been erased and is not available).
48. I was AWOL from the National Guard and deserted the military during time of war.  I refused to take a drug test or even answer any questions about drug use.
49. All records of my tenure as Governor of Texas have been spirited away to my father's library, sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public view.  All records of any SEC investigation into my insider trading or bankrupt companies are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public view.
50. All minutes of meetings of any public corporations for which I served on the board are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public view.  Any records or minutes from meeting I (or my VP ) attended regarding public energy policy are sealed in secrecy and unavailable for public review.

I keep valuable information away from people who I fundamentally most disrespect!

We have already seen that the strange people will argue even the most outrageous absurdities seemingly into reality RELENTLESSLY as the Jesuit Oath demands.  When we first encountered them over the internet, we never thought that their influence and talents would go outside of the discussions we were having over the internet.  We never thought that the world population or the American people can be deceived by them or would be unable to recognize their talents as we witnessed them working on the newsgroups.  The bible winds up saying some not so complimentary things about the intelligence of the nations when Christ comes back the second time.  Let us then simply test your intelligence just briefly here:

EXAMPLE I:

The question is: Did president Bush lie America into needless war?  Here are two notables arguing about that very point where the result is the usual presumed stalemate based upon their different opinions....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trOdCU6aZOg

In the above Youtube video, the host of FOXX News, Bill O'Reilly takes on Michael Moore, who produced the movie, "Fahrenheit 911." That movie was very critical of president Bush.  In the video, Bill O'Reilly takes Michael Moore to task for publicly accusing president Bush of being a "liar;" of literally lying in order to take America into war, killing far more people that even Saddam ever could.  They then begin to argue and wrangle over the seemingly unanswerable question as to whether president Bush lied America into war or not. Ultimately O'Reilly claimed that he had his version of what went down, and Michael Moore had his.  That is what we hear all the time in all the confusion everywhere, until the most simple of issues are driving America nuts and causing it to waste its very existence for no reason at all.  The idea is to first confuse the enemy, which happens to be you and me.  Soon afterwards, when everyone is confused, then the same people who wanted differences of opinions to dominate everywhere ultimately evolve into telling everyone what is what and what changes must take place.  It gets to the point where these things are beyond ridiculous, while a literal propaganda team hovers around ready to, like all other propaganda teams of history, give mental evaluations for anyone who concludes a conspiracy is afoot. 

It gets to the level of insanity where we are arguing now about whether or not waterboarding is torture.  President Bush insists on being weird to all American history, just as much as he insists on being compatible with all communist and nazi history by bringing in issues claiming that they are "new," when we've seen these issues already practiced throughout the darkest eras of history.  Who could have imagined that we watched Lenin, Engels, Stalin, Kruschev, Hitler and others prosper, and watched them die without ever asking them whether or not waterboarding was torture, to now be struggling with that question only after 2001?  Why did we allow ourselves to be so haunted by this question when we had ample opportunity to ask those brutal dictators of history whether or not their own policies, also for "security," were torture?

Reader: did president Bush lie in order to get America into war?  There's no way to actually find out?  YES THERE IS!  We can find out by making scenarios or examples.  Just make an example case or scenario involving yourself, putting yourself in the spotlight....

Say while you were at work someone told you that your wife was raped and beaten very badly and was in the hospital in a coma.  Someone then comes and tells you that someone living in your neighborhood, rumored to be a drug dealer, had done it.  Soon another person and another person claims that same person had done it.  You ask each one of them if they were there or saw the incident, and they tell you no.  Then, as you are getting hot and angry with each passing moment, several people come by and tell you there's no proof the rumors you heard were true and that you shouldn't get yourself involved without first learning all the facts.  While police are investigating, you then come out with this "new" principle that you must not wait for tragedies to occur, you have to punish people suspected of anything before they get a chance to do more wrong.  You then conclude that you don't have to prove they did anything wrong.  You just conclude that you "can't take any chances" for this "drug dealer" might do more harm.  After all, why wait till the last minute?  You pump up this "new" principle and stake your reputation before the whole neighborhood on it, making yourself out to be some role model and hero even for future generations.  It becomes a big issue in your neighborhood and armies of people begin to support you, while even more people are against you and tell you beforehand the mistake you are running into.  Those who support you then persecute those who oppose you and begin to give them free mental evaluations.  It's a terrible fight!  You then visit the accused unannounced and beat him so badly that he dies.  The police investigation continues, and, whada ya know!  The accused didn't do it!

Here now is the crux of the matter to show whether or not an honest mistake was made.  You went in there and did damage while staking your reputation on the line in front of multitudes of people in your neighborhood.  You, however, along with everyone else, found out that YOU WERE WRONG!  What now?  What do you do when you make a horrible mistake after staking your reputation that you were doing the right thing before armies of people?  It is this that will reveal whether or not you actually went in for honest reasons or no.

An honest person will do the following if such a tragic mistake was made.

1. TURN RED!

2. Confess that you were wrong!

3. Offer REPARATIONS and SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES!  That includes to the law for murder.  At that time, you will not even be able to believe that you will be forgiven, NOR THAT YOU EVEN DESERVE TO BE!

We are talking here about just any old Moe and Joe.  The rules here are even harder if you profess to be a Christian as Bush professes to be, even to the point of distinguishing himself as different, more blessed, and better than any other American president.  Next is the fact that one person, rumored to be a drug dealer, died.  That is not the case with the Iraq War.

Let's now look at what happened in the case of President Bush.  911 took place.  Evidence points to Osama Bin Laden as the cause and everyone, including President Bush agrees.  Suddenly President Bush starts up a controversy claiming that Saddam Hussein had a great deal to do with it and begins to claim that, for the heroic interest of American security, he must be taken out.  The claim is out that intelligence is telling him that Saddam Hussein is attempting to stage an attack on America from his no-fly-zones.  Other intelligence is telling him that's not true.  Everyone knows Osama attacked at 911.  He has a choice to make.  Should he remember the mission to take out Osama Bin Laden "dead or alive?"  Or should he divert to the threat of an already defeated dictator, wallowing in no-fly-zones, ready to devastate the mightiest nation on the earth?  He already obstructed the 911 investigations, claiming that it would take away too much resources needed for the War on Terror.  Is there anything else that can take away even more needed resources?  At the same time, North Korea boldly announces their WMDs to the world right under his nose, leaving no confusion about the matter.

He decides to go after Saddam.  He starts the war in Iraq and, after preliminary victories were accomplished, immediately begins a search for those WMDs he was talking about claiming was the cause for war.  He begins this search because everyone is noticing that the advancing American soldiers were not being hit with the nuclear WMDs that was supposed to have caused the war.  It soon becomes apparent that there were no WMDs.

The first thing we noticed is that someone could not blush.  All of a sudden there is a huge movement claiming that the person who would not blush is a hero, and that he did the right thing and is the best President America ever had.  Armies of people everywhere and all over the internet continually and repeatedly chant how great the person who made that kind of mistake is.  The people who told them it was a mistake to enter that war (especially the Democrats) and who then endured all kinds of humiliation and free mental evaluations, are now offered more and stronger mental evaluations (the typical services done in detention camps).  No apologies were made.

Now that we found out there are no WMDs, it's time to leave, right?  NOPE!  Suddenly Arabs and Muslims noticed that an already defeated country was attacked under false pretenses.  The person who committed this atrocity, after bullying Saddam telling him he had better surrender his WMDs OR ELSE, did not blush!  No offer of reparations.  No apologies to the Arab and Muslim world.  Very likely something like this could happen again.  TO THIS DAY, THE VERY DEMOCRATS ELECTED TO STOP BUSH AND MAKE HIM ACCOUNTABLE, HAVE DONE NOT A THING EVEN AGAINST THE PRINCIPLE OF PRE-EMPTIVE WAR WHICH GOT US INTO THIS TROUBLE TO BEGIN WITH TO PREVENT IT FROM EVER HAPPENING AGAIN!  Arabs and Muslims flock to Iraq to fight seemingly for their own existence.  The impression is given them that America wants to genocide them.  Now the war has taken a different turn, and then comes another new initiative:  "We can't 'surrender' or 'cut and run!'  What would the world think of us!!"  They didn't bother to ask that question after the big blunder that produced not the slightest blush ALL IN THE NAME OF CHRISTIANITY!

The scenario is much worse than your example of attacking and killing one man because you believed he raped your wife.  You are also not assumed to be a Christian and therefore one notch above every other man or president.

EXAMPLE II:

A tragedy takes place in your neighborhood.  Let's say that a store was robbed and the storeowner was killed.  Police come and get ready to start an investigation.  All of a sudden, someone approaches and begins to obstruct the investigation.  He tried to conceal or cover-up some of the evidence.

Question:  Do you know who perpetrated the crime?  Do you know who might be involved, or at least conclusively knows what happened?

Here you will be tested.  In current events after crimes or tragedies, people and entities are covering up evidence and corrupting investigations.  At the same time, these same people are insisting that they had nothing to do with the tragedies or crimes.  They repeatedly insist they are not involved.  What do you think?

Although current events would show people getting in the way of investigations, the general public today wind up still not knowing who or what has caused certain tragedies.  Just this one example alone shows what has been happening to the intelligence and psyche of the global population.  But let us put it this way:

You watch the judge shows like Judge Judy, Judge Matthis and others.  If a plaintiff and defendant are in any of these courts and the judge learns that a crime is committed and that when the police start an investigation, one of these worked to cover-up evidence or obstruct the investigation, what would those judges assume?

If the judge asks a litigant questions as he or she is INVESTIGATING a case, and the litigant constantly evades and will not plainly answer the questions, what will the judges assume?  What will happen?  I have seen these judge programs and know what would happen.  The general public also watches these programs regularly.  But something different then happens WHEN THE US GOVERNMENT covers up investigations.  Because so many strange people RELENTLESSLY bellow that the government is exempt from this iron-clad rule known for ages, people are believing this.

If any person or entity covers-up evidence that is to be used for an investigation, it is to be perfectly assumed that the person had something to do with the crime or tragedy.  It is true that say a mother would tamper with evidence to prevent an investigation from pointing to her son because of "love" and not because she herself is guilty of any crime.  In ultimate justice, everyone is supposed to understand that if they cover-up or conceal evidence, it is to be assumed that they had something to do with the crime or tragedy.  All such should enter the process of trial and punishment.  Much more evidence is really not necessary.  During that period or process, ultimate investigation of the incident should be continued, and, if the actual truth is found in time, the person who obstructed the investigation or covered up evidence might escape the most horrific charges.  But everyone should know in advance that if they get in the way of evidence or investigation, it should be assumed that they had something to do with the crime or tragedy. 

Ever heard of the situation with Commerce Secretary Ron Brown under the Clinton Administration?  He died mysteriously in a plane crash.  Just when a completely customary investigation was about to take place, the administration demanded that the investigation be halted and that it be assumed that the plane went down because of a bad storm.  Since that time and before, situations like this have more and more increased despite the distrust that such actions will naturally earn.  As this activity escalates, they endeavor to make the American people be conditioned into thinking this is normal behavior and no indicator of any treason or trouble.  They then bellow day and night about that very frightening group of people called, "Conspiracy theorists" who arouse their paranoia.

This test above is just one example.  Let's try another one.

EXAMPLE III:

Say, for some unknown reason, you were called to testify in the Independent 911 investigation.  Brother Ted and I were talking about this.  He was saying what would have happened had he been called to testify in the Independent 911 hearings.  He said that IMMEDIATELY he would have dropped everything he had planned and canceled everything.  He said he would make it to the hearings no matter where they are.  He said that even upon being asked, he would be trembling.  When he got there, he would easily testify under oath.

As he talked about this circumstance with me, he said, "Why shouldn't I do that?  I have nothing to hide."  Both he and I had nothing to do with 911 at all, and he was more than 1,000 miles away from Ground Zero at the time.  When asked why he would tremble, his instant reply was that THE WEIGHT OF 3,000 GRAVES WOULD BE HOVERING OVER HIS HEAD.

The case was different with President Bush.  Brother McMillan, was not in any way responsible for protecting those 3,000 people who died at 911.  President Bush was.  President Bush failed them.  It doesn't matter if Bush was outsmarted by the terrorists or not.  Something was erected and paid for to protect those 3,000, and it failed to do so!  Notwithstanding, Brother McMillan would tremble, and instantly cooperate to testify under oath at the 911 investigation.  President Bush would not testify unless it was with Dick Cheney, and then, not under oath.

Question:  Does president Bush care about the 3,000 who died at 911?

Answer:  NO!

Instantly the strange ones would lay many eggs with the hydrogen sulfide gas.  We don't care.  There are certain things and even intuitions that can be understood even by mothers.  The rules of the game are the same even if it is the President of the United States.  When the Patriot Act was established, those supporting this backward set of laws asked why anyone would oppose it and then began to ask, "You have something to hide?"  Perish the thought they would ask that same question under their same rules when a serious investigation is required where no one in their right minds would have any opposition for testifying cleanly under oath, except those who have something to hide.

You still may say that it is still unfair to conclude that Bush didn't care and that we should be more careful.  Is this like the same standard of carefulness when President Bush is being given the power to be able to arrest and detain anyone without charge based upon accusations when he has even publicly fouled up many times, had some 89 people tortured to death thinking they had information (and then obviously didn't), started a war based on invisible WMDs, and yet has not blushed to date??  Shouldn't someone ask him to be careful when he claims through law that he can arrest and detain anyone on a whim on suspicion of having ties to terrorists when he is the only widely known American who has at least had intimate ties both with Osama Bin Laden and the Saudis?  If he doesn't need to be careful, and no one must assume anything about him, why is he enabled to assume so much against millions of innocents?

EXAMPLE IV:

Next, the recent incident where Dick Cheney shot his friend in his face while hunting.  The Sheriff of the area approached in order to document the incident.  He was told to leave.  Naturally an investigation is appropriate.  Dick Cheney refuses to talk to anyone for 14 hours.  It is illegal to hunt while drinking.  Normal procedure could not be followed.  Dick Cheney used his power to prevent an investigation in the same way one would be forced on an ordinary citizen under the same circumstances.

Question:  Was Dick Cheney drinking at that time?

Answer:  YES!

You have to be definite and know what you're talking about.  Dick Cheney would not have dismissed an investigation for some 14 hours if he was not drinking.  Isn't that what you would conclude if a normal citizen did the same thing and was somehow able to dismiss a timely investigation?

You need to understand that this is what is weakening your power as a citizen.  DO NOT THINK FOR ONE MINUTE THAT IF YOU FELL UNDER THE SAME SITUATION, THE ONES CRYING THAT YOU DON'T KNOW OR CANNOT KNOW THAT DICK CHENEY HAD BEEN DRINKING WILL THEN BE CONFUSED!  The ones telling you to be careful exempt themselves when they see fit!  THEY ARE THE FIGMENTS OF JACK CHICK'S VERY VIVID IMAGINATION!  They always crutch you with their rules they themselves are immune to!  They tell you that you have to respect those who differ.  You don't understand that they themselves are not bound to this!!  That's why the government is now more renegade and bold than ever!  When you are ready to check it or even find out what is going on, the propaganda team is there to tell you to BE CAREFULL!  UNDERSTAND THAT OTHERS DISAGREE WITH YOU!!  THE GOVERNMENT IS FINE!!  Can people disagree with that??  You conclude:  THERE IS A CONSPIRACY!!  They then go...

"Look Mah!!  I'M ROLLIN' ON THE FLOOR!!  HAA HAA HAAA HAAAAAH!  CONSPIRACY THEORIST!  LOOK MAH, I'M ROLLIN ON THE FLOOR!"

They then become your psychiatrists and talk of your paranoia, etc.  You thought all their time would be taken up rolling on the floor.  When people start talking about the conspiracy, THEN THEY HAVE TO ACT!

These are just four examples above testing our intelligence.  If you failed the three examples above, you are in trouble and we wind up suffering more and more.  No amount of babbling by even the fifth-column army of treason in the United States is supposed to cause you to not know clearly the answers to the four examples above.  If you don't understand the conclusions above, you are losing the war of liberty and for your country.  You are being taken step by step toward misery and ruin.  Prosperity will more and more leave.  Then, TERROR will more and more grow!  Just like the government is more and more pushing terror concerns you never heard before nor needed to worry about, the more you demonstrate to them that you are stupid, is the faster these things appear.

Now, let's see what more we can find out that may just hopefully stir or test your intelligence...

EXAMPLE V:  911 AND THE WAR ON TERROR IF PRESIDENT BUSH WAS AN AMERICAN!!

911 takes place. Planes attacked buildings and 3,000 lives were taken on my watch. Even if I am negro, my face turns RED. I am called to give a speech at ground zero. I cannot hide neither my grief nor my embarrassment. The leaders of the Kremlin were embarrassed when a stray aircraft inadvertently strayed over their headquarters. Their faces turned red. My face would turn much more red, viewing that the result was the loss of 3,000 lives under my watch. In my speech I call for an immediate independent investigation of the whole scenario. I will demand that EVERYTHING must be investigated, INCLUDING MYSELF. I will not staff the internet and all media with abandoned psychiatrists in order to tell the world 911 must be an unsolved issue BECAUSE NO ONE CAN LOOK AT NOR PROPERLY INVESTIGATE ME. The whole issue will be transparent. I will not destroy any records, flight plans nor anything. Anyone who does that will be severely punished and even criminalized by me. It will be most important that the people understand what has happened. Concerned about DEMOCRACY, what the American people believe or learn would bear heavily upon me.

If I learn that huge numbers of the American people believe I'm involved, I would be very hurt and very concerned. If I then hear that significant numbers of the entire global population believe I'm involved, I will feel like I'm going out of my mind. I cannot commission the propaganda team to storm the internet and help me pretend I don't see that I'm distrusted globally. I don't have one, number one, next, I don't mind having lights and cameras on me to explain everything about where I was during the time, what are my possible affiliations with those involved, etc. That way more info and more of the truth would come out so that I myself may know what happened. On the other hand, If I was the real Bush, I would do what the real Bush did.  If I would even start a war claiming that all the world MUST know and love Democracy even if it kills them, I WILL CARE ABOUT WHAT THE PEOPLE THINK ABOUT ME!

I would be the first to testify under the independent 911 investigation. I will testify cleanly and under oath. I will testify trembling since the graves of 3,000 people will be hovering over me in responsibility. I will not stuff the internet with abandoned propagandists to chide Americans for opposing laws that violate their privacy, but who will forget to ask me if I have anything to hide if I refuse to testify cleanly and under oath. Who will even forget to ask me if I have anything to hide, even if others remind them they should ask me.

I will not be barking and moaning day in and day out about the big bad ol "Conspiracy Theorists" that are out to nuke us. I will always make Americans know that they are free to believe what they want to believe, and that freedom is always a blessing to a nation and not a curse, even if it is at my personal expense. I will not do anything to ridicule them out of either believing, looking into or investigating whatsoever they wish and then come to whatsoever conclusions they deem are valid. I will not even be running an anti-paranoia campaign against people who notice that government coverups, lies and tampering with the American Constitution escalates all the time. For me, it would be incompatible to teach others against the deadly disease of paranoia to then allow people who, in their freedom, believe there is a conspiracy from constantly escalating evidence to make me lose much sleep.

I would not suggest that I be rewarded for any reason for my failure to protect the American people. I would put myself at the mercy of the people and the other branches of government to decide if they would further require my services as president because of the great embarrassment of America being viciously attacked under my watch in a way without precedent: a red-carpet entrance of the terrorists. I would not try to put the blame for what happened anywhere else, especially if I had been warned that something like this could happen. I would never even suggest that I must be re-elected, lest another attack unprecedented before my watch might happen again which never happened under the watch of any other elected official.

Whenever the families of 911 ask me what happened, I will be very attentive to their questions, and even allow televised interviews with them individually. I will not pretend that their questions are not being asked, and then when others ask on the internet, I send abandoned crazy Nazi psychiatrist propaganda men to ignore questions there also till they claim the questions are dumb and free Americans have to worship my propaganda team. If anyone gives them the typical propagandist "love" or infer they need mental evaluations for requiring answers, I will use all my influence against them.  I will not believe that the victims families of 911 are dumb because propagandists say so.

If Osama Bin Laden is called the main man for 911, I would focus on him and the organization or organizations directly linked to him to mete out justice. I will not be diverted anywhere else to then send any propaganda team ready to use the same tactics the ones in nazi Germany used to babble people from understanding the most obvious things. I will not spend half my life warning people about the dangers of paranoia, and then put my sights on a defeated and contained dictator, feeling secure in my paranoia because I have a propaganda team that chuckles at people fearing black helicopters "under every bed." Now the dreaded super-power on the backs of Middle Eastern Muslim extremists that they avoided because of the problems they already had with Israel, that super-power which kept America impregnable to terror, will be brought to bear upon their backs.