THE BIBLE SAYS THE NATIONS WILL BE INCOHERENT OR 'DRUNK' WITH THEIR THINKING IN THE LAST DAYS!! TEST YOUR POLITICAL IQ HERE!

WHAT HEAVEN THINKS OF THE WORLD TODAY IN CHANGE!
Want to test your IQ?

Does Susan Williams believe terrorists should actually have trials?? Answer: NO! Terrorists should not have civilian trials.

A terrorist is supposed to be someone WHO ALREADY HAS BEEN TRIED OPENLY AND THEN FOUND TO BE A TERRORIST! If he's a terrorist before a trial, then someone who accused him DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THE AMERICAN PRINCIPLE THAT ALL ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!

NEW 150 Questions on this page below that open eyes and save lives! The RIGHT QUESTIONS that are never asked!

NEW: Second part to this page!! Did president Bush lie to America in order to take it into war?? Michael Moore and Bill O'Reilly from Foxx News duke it out about this question.

Why would our national leaders want to maintain an Iraq presence for as much as 100 years against the wishes of the American people? It is a rather unique place of "purging" to destroy those troops who love the Constitution and the global population!

DID YOU KNOW THAT ROME PURGES EVEN HER OWN FOLLOWERS TOO?

NATURAL RULE OF LAW: HE WHO SITS COMFORTABLY WHILE THE MOST EVIL DESTROY, WILL EVENTUALLY BE MOST ACTIVE AND DILIGENT AGAINST THE ACTIVE WHO TRY TO SAVE!
There is not a single problem America is facing today that is caused by so-called, "Conspiracy theorists." Neither is it wrong to exercise your free rights and believe there is a global conspiracy. Every problem we know of is caused by the people who can't rest when honest people who believe there is a global conspiracy speak. That includes starting false wars and perpetuating them. You cannot depend on the vast thought-police everywhere who claim to have the wisdom to thought-police all media and give mental diagnoses to all participants there who do not agree with them to stop scandals, cover-ups or constitutional tampering, BECAUSE THEY ARE HERE TO MAKE SURE NOTHING CHALLENGES THESE THINGS.
Before a mighty nation falls signs will be seen. It is impossible for America to fall without some indicators in view for all to see. The purpose of the Conspirator or propagandist is to make sure the American people either don't see or understand these signs.

If The Third Reich and the Communist nations always already had government surveillance, secret courts and trials, preemptive war policies, detention camps and torture, ALONG WITH A PROPAGANDA TEAM, why would you think that America, following in their footsteps would not have one?

In true common sense, if the government constantly engages in lies, scandals, cover-ups and constitutional tamperings, no true American citizen is supposed to take his eyes off of the people who do these things to then use all his might against people who don't like what is happening and is trying to alert the American people. Even if people believe in conspiracies that are not true or are frivolous, a true American will let them believe and speak what they want and won't touch them till they constantly put their energies against American leaders and people causing these things. If you rent an apartment and pay your rent but get no heat, a true witness to your plight would not constantly attack you, claiming that you complain too much, without first using all energies against the landlord that caused the situation. The only time anyone complains about a problem too much, is when the problem has been solved, but yet the person still continues to complain. But that is what the conspirator does, and the American people do not realize that they should not put their trust in strange people everywhere whose very presence is for the purpose of making lies, scandals, cover-ups and constitutional tamperings to continue and get worse.

The same people now jump on posters on the internet claiming they cannot ASSUME that the Bush Administration is in treason, but did nothing when Bush said he has the right to ASSUME that any of the millions of Americans can have ties to terrorists and can then become a detainee with no way to defend himself.

NEW! TREASONOUS MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY BEING INTERVIEWED, SHOWING THE REASON WHY FRIENDLY-FIRE DEATHS IN ALL THE WARS AMERICA HAS HAD WERE MOSTLY NOT ACCIDENTS AT ALL!

WHAT WILL THEY THINK WHEN WE SHOW THEM THE BOLD THREATS OF DEATH AGAINST ALL NON-CATHOLICS EAGERLY POSTED BY FLAGRANT BUSH SUPPORTERS AFTER HE INSTITUTED THE PATRIOT ACT??...

"Surely we have some brave and reliable Roman Catholic officers and soldiers in our armies, but they form an insignificant minority when compared with the Roman Catholic traitors against whom we have to guard ourselves, day and night…." -- Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, pg. 296. President Abraham Lincoln, being witnessed by Father Charles Chiniquy.

My posting on this particular military forum started with a comparison between the "conspiracy theorist" and his counterpart who gave him the name. I had already noticed that there were propagandists on this forum also before making this first thread. Automatically they advance. Automatically they avoid discussion and begin to say that I've posted "crap." The desperacy to drown out what I'm posting is apparent, and the exact same tactics are used as we demonstrated all over the internet.

After a while I was, according to the moderators there, temporarily (10 days) suspended for posting inflammatory material. The 10 days long ago expired and we were not reinstated. Although we at first faulted them for that judgment suspending us in the first place, we realized that we were indeed wrong. We had forgotten the principle of a sovereign institution that was placed on the Seventh-dayAdventism.com website. We made an agreement when registering on that forum, and we therefore neglected to understand the issues while posting on that system.

What we're trying to show here, IS THE PEOPLE WHO WERE AROUND PAT TILLMAN, AND ARE AROUND YOUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS IN THE MILITARY AS WELL AS THEIR PURPOSE FOR BEING THERE AND THE PURPOSE OF THE WARS TO BEGIN WITH. Hopefully the warnings of the American forefathers to avoid wars and being the global policemen around the world would be ringing in your ears, especially if you have a child in the military.

TREASONOUS MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY EXPOSED HERE SHOWING YOU THE HORRORS OF WHAT ACTUALLY IS AROUND YOUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS IN THE MILITARY!

1. The Conspiracy Theorist and the Conspirator Compared! Page 2
2. No Conspirator Can Stop the Seeds that Sprout Conspiracy Theorists! Page 2
3. Martial Law! Pages 2, 3
4. 112 Questions that Can Save Liberty, Country, and Lives!
5. Know Propaganda When You See It!
6. Cheney Predicts Iraq Mistake Years Before Committing it!
7. "Hopeless to Save it Now!" -- Bush Supporter Speaking of America!
8. The Illuminati -- Another "Nutcase" Traitors Hate Speaks About it!
9. No Conspiracy, Why No Freedom?
10. Are Our Soldiers Dying to Make Sure We Don't Believe There's a Conspiracy?
11. Unstoppable Process of Globalization! Can the Constitution Stop it?
12. Best Proof Antiwar People Love the Troops!
13. Gen. Betrayus: "We Fight for the Right for People to Have Other Opinions!"

Part 4: http://www.TheirSecrets.info/patriotact.htm
What is the actual purpose of the Patriot Act. Strange people in dialogue prove that the actual purpose of the Patriot Act is directly opposite to the purposes advertised to the world from those who created and instituted it.

Part 5: http://www.TheirSecrets.info/iraqwar.htm
What is the actual purpose for war. Not just the Iraq war, but virtually every other America has had. The bible itself shows that what comes after war is tyranny! A brief insight to how this takes place.

THE HOLY SCRIPTURES, VS "THE BAD BOYS!" ... A sad, heart-rending showing as members of the US military on forums post EMPHATICALLY how America will lose its honor, strength and liberty, OVER THEIR DEAD BODIES! All this compared with scripture which says precisely THAT IT WILL DO JUST THAT!

WHO ARE OUR ENEMIES, THIS TIME!! Enemies which caused America to beat the war drums and become concerned about security, came and went!! What happened to them when America beat them in conflict AND WHEN SHE DID NOT??

HOSTILITY AND WHAT CAUSES IT!... Why some of our worst enemies which cost us so much and challenged our very existence, wound up now being called our friends! Important message about the behavior of our national leaders and current society that will lead to dangerous and traumatic events in just the near future!

Part 1: http://www.TheirSecrets.info/ac/appealchapintro.htm
What is actually going on under the new movements that are radically changing America and the rest of the world.

Part 2: http://www.TheirSecrets.info/ac/appealchapintro2.htm
Our Bold Move, showing how we entered into debate with some very strange people who encouraged all kinds of conflicting debates and classes, AND WON! These strange people understand what the American citizens do not, about shocking events soon to overtake them. A strange message from heaven showing the world there is no excuse for its current confusion, and that failing to search into end-time prophecies will result in a curse upon all.

Part 3: http://www.TheirSecrets.info/ac/appealchapintro3.htm
Why does the bible curse anyone who refuses to look into the prophecies? Simple examples from prophecy showing what heaven thinks of the intelligence of the world today and what actually are the worst global problems few are noticing.

Last Part: http://www.TheirSecrets.info/ac/appealchapintro6.htm
This page shows that everything that is taking place against American principle currently is happening because of infiltration into our society by militant infiltrationist Jesuits. That is a generic term that we use to identify all the orders of the Papacy that constantly work to acquire positions in every area of life in our society with the pre-meditated intent to destroy it and to reinstall the Inquisitions. We reveal some of their typical tactics here..

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=2008-06-18_D91CMHIG1&show_article=1&cat=breaking
Obama says bin Laden must not be a martyr

Jun 18 03:54 PM US/Eastern
By NEDRA PICKLER
Associated Press Writer

[Here, our possibly next president is more and more showing he will be no different from the Bush Agenda. Like all the propagandists on the internet we ask to urge president Bush to go after Osama, Obama now tells us that he will not want to punish Osama Bin Laden with death. Why then was it important to make sure Saddam was punished with death?

What is it about Osama Bin Laden that makes so many communists and nazis at heart want to keep him free and alive?? Why are the same people all over the internet who obviously want him to remain free, constantly telling us we hate our troops and are traitors?]

MOMMY, WHY IS IT JUST AS HARD TO GET BUSH TO ATTACK OSAMA AS IT IS TO GET OSAMA TO ATTACK BUSH, INSTEAD OF EVERYTHING ELSE?

ALRIGHT, WE SHOULDN’T HAVE GONE INTO IRAQ! WHAT DO WE DO NOW? ALRIGHT TED BUNDY SHOULDN’T HAVE KILLED OVER 40 WOMEN, WHAT DID WE DO THEN TO MAKE SURE IT DOESN’T HAPPEN AGAIN?

IF WE MISTAKENLY ATTACKED AN ALREADY DEFEATED MUSLIM NATION FOR WMDS, WHAT WOULD THE WORLD THINK OF US IF WE “SURRENDERED” OR “CUT AND RUN?”

MAN! IT’S DIFFICULT TO SHED BLOOD FOR DEMOCRACY AFTER THE AMERICAN PEOPLE VOTES THE WAR DOWN! BUT THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT NAZIS CAN DO THAT EASILY! DID GEN. PETRAEUS BETRAY OUR VOTES AGAINST THE WAR?

IS THERE AN ISSUE ABOUT SEDITION, IN A TIME OF WAR, THAT THE LAST ELECTIONS OF 2006 CANNOT SOLVE?

BUSH: “I DON’T BELIEVE WE SHOULD HAVE DISAGREEMENTS OR EVEN ELECTIONS DURING TIMES OF WAR! NOW IF YOU’LL EXCUSE ME, I’M GOIN ON VACATION!”

WHY WOULD CLINTON TELL US HE REGRETS NOT CATCHING OSAMA WHEN HE WAS LITTLE KNOWN AMONG AMERICANS, THEN BUSH BOLDLY TELLS US HE IS NOT GOING AFTER OSAMA NOW?

WE BUSH SUPPORTERS ALWAYS PUT ALL IDIOTS ON IGNORE! NOW IF YOU WILL EXCUSE US, WE HAVE TO ATTACK A DEFEATED DICTATOR UNDER NO-FLY-ZONES!

SAD WE’RE SPENDING MUCH MORE ON SECURITY THAN WE EVER DID JUST SEVEN YEARS AGO? CHEER UP! AT LEAST NOW YOU KNOW YOU WILL STILL BE ATTACKED BY TERRORISTS, UNLIKE BEFORE! BE HAPPY!

BUSH: "NO MAGIC WAND TO CURE HI GAS PRICES!" LAST ONE EXISTED UP UNTIL 2001!

WOW! AMERICA IS SUFFERING SO MUCH NOW! WHEN WILL SHE FINALLY START SUFFERING BECAUSE OF THE "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS" INSTEAD OF THOSE WHO STAND ON GUARD TO EXPOSE THEM?

SHOULDN'T WE LOOK INTO THE PROBABLY LESS THAN ONE PERCENT INCIDENTS OF FRIENDLY FIRE INCIDENTS AGAINST THEIR OWN SOLDIERS IN THE NAZI REGIME OF THE 1940'S? LET'S FIND OUT WHY VIETNAM WAS AS MUCH AS 39%!

HOW DARE YOU SUSPECT OR ACCUSE MY BUSH OF TREASON WHILE HE EXERCISES THE RIGHT TO ACCUSE AND DETAIN ALL OF YOU AT WHIM WITHOUT YOU BEING ABLE TO DEFEND YOURSELVES? HOW DARE YOU!

PHEW! IF WE CAN ONLY BEAT THIS DEFEATED DICTATOR SO WE CAN TAKE THE REST OF THE WORLD ON AND SAVE MORE INNOCENT LIVES!

LET'S START WARS FOR DEMOCRACY AND BUILD DETENTION CAMPS FOR THOSE WHO DON'T AGREE!

MOMMY, HOW WOULD WE EVER HAVE HISTORICALLY KNOWN THAT DEFEATED DICTATORS ARE INVINCIBLE IF WE DIDN’T HAVE ONLY JACKASS WHO WOULD ATTACK ONE?

WILL YOU RAISE A WHITE FLAG BEFORE CORPSES IN A MORTUARY INSTEAD OF FIGHTING? OR WOULD YOU RATHER BE A PIG--ERR WAR SUPPORTER!

WE LEAD THE WAR SUPPORTERS TO MORTUARIES TO FIGHT. WE BOLDLY TELL THEM THERE WE ARE INDEED PROUD "CUT AND RUN" DEMOCRATS!

THE PATRIOT ACT IS SUCH A "VITAL" LAW, WE NOW MAKE OUR BORDERS LOOSE TO THE "UNDOCUMENTED", AND ACCEPT THE "UNDOCUMENTED" AND THE FELON TO FIGHT OUR WARS! WE DON'T NEED TO SNOOP THEM!

BUSH WAR SUPPORTERS: "WE CAN'T STOP THE WARS NOW! TOO MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE WILL DIE!"

BEFORE THE VIETNAM WAR, DURING THE VIETNAM WAR AND AFTER THE VIETNAM WAR. WHICH OF THESE PERIODS CAUSED FAR MORE LOSS OF INNOCENT LIVES?

AFTER WE PULLED OUT OF VIETNAM, THE TREASONOUS COULDN'T STAND THE PROSPERITY WE ENJOYED AFTER THAT!

IF WE MUST CORONATE PRESIDENT BUSH FOR FAILING TO PROTECT THE HOMELAND, WOULDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND WHY EVERY OTHER PRESIDENT MISSED THE THRONE?

HOW COULD WE POSSIBLY HAVE EXECUTED THAT DEAR SAINT, TED BUNDY, FOR KILLING A MERE 40+ PEOPLE AND ALLOWED BUSH TO RUN OUR COUNTRY?

SIX YEAR EXPENSIVE UPHILL BATTLE WITH DEFEATED DICTATOR! ARE WE NOW BEING UPGRADED TO IRAN?

FUTURE: AMERICAN SOLDIERS WILL SHOOT YOU IF YOU SO MUCH AS DISOBEY ONE SINGLE UNCONSTITUTIONAL COMMAND OF THE GOVERNMENT. ONES WHO WOULD NOT DO THAT... AIN'T COMIN' BACK!

TRUST ME WITH THIS VERY HORRIBLE FACT: FAR MORE TROOPS SUPPORT BUSH NOW EVEN SECRETLY THAN BEFORE THE WAR!... I WONDER WHY!

EXACTLY HOW SHOULD NEW TEXTBOOKS BE WRITTEN TO SHOW NEW DISCOVERY SINCE THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION THAT ALREADY DEFEATED DICTATORS ARE INVINCIBLE?

A MERE 5 YEARS AFTER BUSH PROVED THAT SADDAM HAD WMDS, THE WAR SUPPORTERS HAVE PROOF AGAIN THAT IRAN HAS!

THE DEMOCRATS ARE SO FRIGHTFULLY EVIL SINCE THE YEAR 2001, I FEEL LIKE I CAN CRY ON OSAMA'S SHOULDER!

SUPPLY, DEMAND, DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS, DEVELOPING CHINA, DEVELOPING INDIA, RECORD FUEL PRICES QUADRUPLED!... ONE OF THESE THINGS DID NOT EXIST BEFORE PRESIDENT BUSH!

THE PREZ THAT STANDS OUT, IN LIMBO!!... IF BUSH CAN'T GET A NOBEL PEACE PRIZE FOR ALL THE BLOOD HE SHED, CAN HE GET A NOBEL WAR PRIZE FOR STRUGGLING 5YRS WITH AN ALREADY DEFEATED DICTATOR AND CAN'T WIN?

CAN'T FIGURE OUT IF BUSH IS AN EFFECTIVE PRESIDENT FOR AMERICAN SECURITY? ASK OSAMA ABOUT HIS OPINIONS ON THE MATTER AT HIS THANKSGIVING DINNER! IF YOU CAN'T MAKE IT THIS YEAR, ASK HIM AT HIS NEXT YEAR'S EXTRAVAGANZA!

CONSPIRACY THEORISTS COULDN'T STOP GIGGLING OVER SADDAM PLAYING WITH HIS RUBBER-DUCKY IN NO-FLY-ZONES! THE ONES WHO LAUGHED AT US FOR FEARING BLACK HELICOPTERS WERE TERRIFIED!

TREASON CAME AND SOLVED THE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS' FEARS OF BLACK HELICOPTERS BY SHOWING HOW TO FEAR ALREADY DEFEATED DICTATORS INSTEAD!

WE STRUGGLE TO STOP WAR CRIMINALS FROM SHEDDING MASSIVE ARAB AND MUSLIM BLOOD! OSAMA THANKS US BY PLANNING ATTACKS AGAINST EVERYTHING ELSE BUT THOSE WAR CRIMINALS!

DEMS REFUSE TO BUILD AN UNPOPULAR "GLOBAL DEMOCRACY!" THEY'RE A MENTAL DISORDER!

WHY WASTE 3 TO 7 TRILLION DOLLARS ON WARS TO PROVE ALREADY DEFEATED DICTATORS ARE INVINCIBLE, WHEN THE ANTI-WAR CROWD COULD HAVE TOLD YOU THAT FOR FREE?? AS A MATTER OF FACT, THEY DID TELL YOU THAT!! YOU'RE ERECTING THE DETENTION CAMPS FOR THE GREAT MENTAL TREATMENT THAT THEY NEED, RIGHT?

IF WAR-MONGERS LOVED AND SUPPORTED OUR TROOPS IN VIETNAM, THEY DIED, THE REST CAME HOME AND WE LOST THE WAR, HOW ARE THE SAME CLASS OF PEOPLE SUPPORTING OUR TROOPS NOW?

MESSAGE TO TERRORISTS!... DON'T ATTACK AMERICA NOW! JIMMY CARTER IS PRESIDENT! MAJOR MISTAKE!! WAIT ABOUT 30 MORE YEARS!

MESSAGE TO TERRORISTS!... DON'T ATTACK AMERICA NOW! HERBERT HOOVER IS PRESIDENT! WAIT ABOUT ANOTHER 80 YEARS!

PRESIDENT THEODORE ROOSEVELT: "WWII COULDN'T DESTROY THIS MIGHTY COUNTRY!" BUSH: "19 HIJACKERS WILL!"

OSAMA INTERVIEW: "MR. OSAMA, WHY'D YOU BYPASS EVEN JIMMY CARTER, AND WAITED TILL BUSH BECAME PRESIDENT TO DESTROY THE MOST MIGHTY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD? WHY DID YOUR FATHER WAIT?

BUSH REPUBLICAN PROPAGANDIST: "THE DEMOCRATS ARE WORKING HARD TO DESTROY THIS COUNTRY SO MUCH!" IF WE COULD ONLY GET THEM TO STOP GIVING PRESIDENT BUSH EVERYTHING HE WANTS!

THE DEMOCRATS HAVING NO PLANS WHATSOEVER FOR ALREADY DEFEATED DICTATORS, ANGERING THOSE WHO START WARS TO SAVE INNOCENT LIVES!

HOW DID BILL CLINTON PULL OFF AN ASTOUNDING BUDGET SURPLUS WITH AN OPPOSING PARTY CONGRESS, AND BUSH CAUSED AN ASTOUNDING UNPRECEDENTED DEFICIT WITH A LIKE PARTY CONGRESS?

WILL 30 YEARS AFTER JIMMY CARTER PRESIDENCY COMPARE WITH 30 YEARS AFTER BUSH'S?

IF PRESIDENT BUSH IS EMPOWERED AND PRAISED FOR FAILING TO STOP 3 PLANES FROM SLAMMING INTO AMERICAN BUILDINGS, WILL PROPAGANDISTS WORSHIP ME AS A GOD FOR ALLOWING 9 TO DO THE SAME?

THREE SIMPLE WAYS TO KNOW PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH, HIS ALLIES AND HIS OPPONENTS!...

It is 1940 and we’re in high school. The teacher in a history class gives an interactive presentation to her students to test what they’ve learned. She begins to speak and says:

"A person comes up to you and tells you he believes that a country is best run using secret courts, secret trials, concentration or detainment camps, intrusive government with the elimination of privacy, and lastly, torture. What kind of a person is he?”

Instantly the students raise their hands eagerly to be called upon to answer. The first one to raise his hand is picked. He quickly gets up and says, “That’s either a communist or a nazi!” The rest of the students don’t look surprised as if he is some genius or brainiac. The teacher acknowledges that the answer the student gave is correct, then says, “and deception, bloodshed, injustice, tyranny and war always follows these people.”

It is now 1970, and we’re in another high school. Another teacher gives a very similar presentation. Just like before, students raise their hands eager to answer. This time a student answers differently. She says to herself that the Nazi Regime and Nazism have been destroyed (as she assumes). She therefore replies, “That must be a communist!” Again the teacher makes her to understand that she is absolutely correct. He adds, “and deception, bloodshed, injustice, tyranny and war always follows these people.”

But then years and years have passed. Strange people popped up claiming we must all debate and immerse ourselves in confusion. We must all be able to express our honest beliefs without being attacked by some “bigots.” Then the dreaded people who used their honest opinions and came to the conclusion that rising government scandals, cover-ups and constitutional tampering is proof of a conspiracy, come more into the light. Then everywhere in society, a babbling throng, eager to destroy those who came to that honest view, but equally eager to make sure the scandals, cover-ups, lies and constitutional tampering continue and get worse and worse, spray the air with the paranoid words, “Conspiracy theorist!” Everywhere they never explain how a single problem to society was ever caused by the dreaded “conspiracy theorist," yet they can never go to sleep when such people exercise freedom and are around.

It is now 2007, and another teacher gives a very similar interactive presentation again. This teacher asks, what is a person who claims that secret courts, secret trials, intrusive government, detainment camps and torture are necessary for security? Now only a few hands raise. One student gets up and reluctantly then replies, “That person is a… a George Bush?”

We then come up with the questions:

What was the attitude of such a communist or nazi in 1940 toward our troops? How did he feel about them?

What was the attitude of communists in 1970 toward our troops? How did they feel about our troops?

Now the final question:

What is the attitude of a George Bush toward our troops? How does he feel about them? Does deception, bloodshed, injustice tyranny and war follow him too?

IS THERE A CONSPIRACY? WHAT CREATES CONSPIRACISTS or CONSPIRACY THEORISTS?...

All kinds of continuing and increasing lies, scandals, tamperings with the Constitution and individual rights is what creates so-called "conspiracy theorists!" The name conspiracy theorist is one created and designed to ridicule anyone who honestly believes there is a global conspiracy against liberty like the American forefathers knew. There are other beliefs about conspiracies, and it is the purpose of conspiracy to create as many stories about conspiracies as possible so that anyone realizing the actual main one going on can be put at nought. I am talking about the main one mentioned in the bible which will work out to the ultimate persecution of God's people. But as scandals, cover-ups and constitutional tamperings grow and grow, true Americans become very concerned, but true conspirators obviously do not! While these things much much lower in the history of America rage, conspirators are very calm and quiet. Some may make a mention about deplorable things happening, YET THEY WILL NOT USE THEIR MIGHT UNTIL THEY SEE PEOPLE RISING UP AND SAYING SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE ABOUT IT, OR THAT PEOPLE NEED TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST IT. The Conspirator will then move against those people who don't want to just sit by and do nothing.

But then something happens! People see what's going on and notices that it increases. As that happens they begin to accurately come to the conclusion that they must do something. As they get ready and concoct means to at least get the American people aware of what is going on, the manhole cover of the conspiracy then begins to rattle. Intense activity begins to spring up as the manhole cover shifts and pops! Then suddenly comes out serpents which, upon reaching the street, transform into Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Fox News, and millions of people all over the world!

These then attack the people who are concerned, and begin to give them psychiatric diagnoses. The honest civilians ask their attackers pointed questions to prove their points that there is no conspiracy dealing with the lies, scandals, Constitutional tamperings and such growing hour by hour, but the conspirators keep evading and then coming back repeating the words, "Conspiracy theorists" not showing America that they are even more concerned of this threat of honest citizens coming to their own honest conclusions, than even catching Osama! Most do not notice the amount of time, concern and paranoia spent by even the elite against honest Americans who have their honest beliefs from the very signs growing daily all about them! The conspirators never told Americans they cannot believe their conspiracy exists in a free country and cannot entertain such honest beliefs! The conspirator never even tells this to the American citizens beforehand!

Then, when they have some success for a while and the honest citizens are away, the conspirator then goes back into his manhole cover and gets quiet again. His blood pressure goes down again, and then scandals, lies, tamperings with the Constitution and civil rights increases more and more and more, and the conspirator falls asleep!

Do you know and understand that if America wins all these wars for "FREEDOM," the number one country other than her that will have to be honored would be...

RED CHINA?
Do you know that Red China "sold her drawers" presently (September 28, 2008) 1.5 trillion dollars to fund our wars for "FREEDOM" against her own hatred of it??? What kind of "mistakes" are these that constantly happen?...

THE REAL QUESTIONS

THE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS

THE UNANSWERED QUESTIONS, just below here...

Now 150 Questions That Save Lives! New questions in blue.

11/4/2008

By Susan Williams

1. Senator Barrack Obama has been in politics for some time now. Why, after realizing Obama is apt to win the presidency, did the Bush/McCain supporters finally realize he was a terrorist--even willing to shed blood because of this, and Bush, long with far more intimate ties with Osama Bin Laden (now still free) and the Saudis is not?

2. Why are the Bush propagandists making such a big deal at the last minute that Obama is a terrorist and based this concern on the idea that he had some form of ties to Bill Ayers? They want to protect the nation from terrorism?? DO YOU KNOW THAT BILL AYERS IS RESPECTABLY TEACHING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS RIGHT NOW? Do you know that he holds the Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar awards? Why didn't the Bush propagandists go get him yet and save us??

3. Why did it take till the last months of the Bush reign to know that the Democrats are the cause for the current financial crisis after starting "pre-emptive" wars claiming we must corner off tragedies before they occur? Was it because all that time we were being saved from "Conspiracy theorists," no-fly-zones and defeated dictators?

4. If government leaders manage to create laws that would give them the powers of dictators if a terrible emergency or crisis comes, why is it only the "conspiracy theorists" will know crises will definitely come despite their heroic efforts to stop them? Why would only they know that if these government leaders cannot preemptively stop these crises before they arrive, they moreso would not be able to get America out of them after they come and Martial Law is installed?

Isn't it a shame Joe Plumber attacked Obama in concern his taxes might be raised but is happy with having 1.5 trillion dollars war against no-fly-zones, 700 billion dollars going to bailouts, and the effects of raised taxes for years at the gas pumps under Bush policy?

5. General Patraeus and his supporters are incensed that people would call him General "Betrayus" claiming he's a traitor to America. Can we find out if this is true if his very kids know that the wars now staged for "democracy" have been voted down by the American people and they still continue? Was the American vote these wars being staged to protect in "democracy" betrayed?

6. Bush said in May 2008: "Popularity is fleeting. Principles are forever." How long then will it take even Harvard, Yale, Georgetown and Princeton to understand that wars for "Global Democracy"...

are lies?

7. Why would Bush finally flip-flop and tell us the Iraq War situation is similar to what happened in Vietnam and we therefore can't pull out? Did we have to attack the Vietcong and start the Vietnam war because they were already defeated and were in no-fly-zones like Saddam was?

Where wars "for global democracy" can be voted down by the people and be globally unpopular, but will still continue anyway. Every heard of an "unpopular democracy?"

8. Since war-mongers also told us before the Vietnam war, that we had to fight the enemy there or fight them here, and that we have to fight that war in order to "defend our freedoms" just like today, how did we cope with enemies here in our land and tyranny all these years after we lost that war and pulled out?

9. If we pulled out of Iraq now, is it true terrorists would use Iraq, half way around the world, to attack us here, instead of some alternative place closer? You mean this was proven by terrorists using oil-rich Iran to attack us from there? Does anyone understand that oil-rich Iran is almost 4 times larger than Iraq?? You mean we were terrorized by Iran all these years and didn't know it??

They're saying that if we pulled out of Iraq even before, it would be taken over by terrorists and become an oil-rich terrorist nation like Iran. IT WOULD THEN ATTACK US LIKE IRAN ALWAYS HAS BEEN!

Here we are showing that your sons and daughters DID DIE FOR NOTHING! Nay more, further information shows they were marked to die BECAUSE THEY WOULD DEFEND YOUR FREEDOMS!

10. Is there something about the accusation of treason or sedition that the 2006 elections cannot solve? [Bush propagandists shout out freely that all who oppose Bush are in treason or sedition. America opposed Bush in the 2006 elections.]

11. Will the seriousness of the current terrorism situation, which they tell us demands the reinterpretation of the Constitution to what it had always opposed, convince President Bush that he shouldn't be the number one vacationing president in American history? [Obviously he knows the situation is at least well under his control.]

12. Besides hearing a deafening roar of laughter more thunderous than all our nuclear devices exploding at once, why won't Bush and his propagandists urge Russia, with her pristine military, to defend her new-found freedoms in Iraq?

13. Russia - The United States! One of these nations is stupid and the other isn't. One of these nations would defend her freedoms in Iraq and the other wouldn't. Is the one who would defend her freedoms in Iraq stupid or not?

14. Why would President Bush know that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are in the best interest of the United States and freedom and liberty? Why then would Communist China also know those wars are in the best interest of America and would be willing literally put themselves out to fund it to the tune presently of 1.5 trillion dollars? When did Communist China SUDDENLY have America's best interests at heart? Was it when President Bush SUDDENLY had its best interests at heart?

15. None of the Communist countries are STUPID enough to fight for freedom in Iraq. WHY WOULD THEY BE STUPID ENOUGH TO FUND BUSH'S WARS FOR "FREEDOM" TO THE TUNE OF 1.5 TRILLION DOLLARS WHEN FREEDOM OPPOSES THEIR REGIME CONCEPTS? Could it be they know Bush's wars are for the OPPOSITE??

16. People keep assuming that President Bush is not very bright. If that is so, why did he have the intelligence to know that wars to destroy America and freedom requiring one and a half trillion in funding cannot be financed by free countries?

17. How come terrorists are not thinking of attacking Russia? If they hate us because we're free, why wouldn't they hate Russia even more? Note: All tyrannical regimes and people would more hate and oppose their own members who betray their cause against freedom over those who were always already free. Consider also that Russia never directly involved herself in the quarrels between Arab and Jew like the United States did outside of the directives of the Constitution.

18. I arm you with guns just in case the federal government of the United States becomes tyrannical and dangerous. You reply: "You have lost it man! You're a conspiracy theorist! You're a terrorist! Here, let me get you some help!" I then make a proposition: Instead of that, I write a Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States to arm you with guns just in case the federal government of the United States becomes tyrannical and dangerous. You reply, "That's better! I see you're finally coming round!"

MESSAGE: The American forefathers were, "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS!" They knew there was a global conspiracy. That's why they created the Second Amendment and made the United States an "ISOLATIONIST" country.

19. If we can't afford the inexperience of Obama being president, just what was it we were "enjoying" all these 8 years America?

Accomplishments of President G. W. Bush: Please see 50 accomplishments of President Bush on the second IQexhibits webpage:

Sitting idly by while 3 planes struck down buildings in the United States.

Claiming dictator powers not because he stopped 3 planes from destroying lives, but because he didn't stop them, unlike every other president that protected us and didn't claim such rewards.

Attacking an already defeated dictator looking for invisible WMDs that were not there without a blush.

Allowing the person responsible for 911 to still remain free.

Spending 6yrs trying to defeat the already defeated dictator.

Destroying the American treasury profiteering off of the wars against the defeated dictator.

Wasting the lives of generations of innocents in a false war.

Having no solid protection for our troops in the wars and wasting much precious time after being told about that fact.

Instituting security principles the Communists and Nazis always used and calling it "The Patriot Act."

Causing supply, demand, developing China, developing India and offshore drilling restrictions to FINALLY cause fuel prices to leap to record highs and then quadruple yet more.

Forcing America now on the brink of recession.

Many more such exploits by the Bush Administration...

Question: Since it is said that Barrack Obama doesn't have any experience to be president, how much experience would anyone need to emulate the accomplishments of President Bush? Doesn't it make you personally sad that you would never have the presidential experience of President Bush?? What about Adolf Hitler? Are you sorry you don't have the guts to "never back down" like Bush? What about Fidel Castro? Karl Marx? Adolf Hitler?

20. Bush propagandists are scaring a sector of the Christian world by making it look like Obama is fulfilling prophetic scripture by playing the role of saving America and the world from an imminent crisis. Why would they forget that Bush claimed that same role after 911 (saying that he will destroy all evil and that whosoever is "not with us, is with the terrorists") and even directly claims that God talks to him personally? If Obama is the Antichrist by coming to save the United States and global economy, why would it wind up being him saving America from the reign of GW Bush?

21. Why wouldn't John McCain, presumed to be a war hero who was tortured in battle on behalf of the United States, not recognize the principles of the Patriot Act, allowing secret trials, detainment without evidence and torture, for what it is?

Don't be an IDIOT! No matter what, or no matter what the hatred or anger, no Middle Eastern Muslim extremist or all of them together will ever get the power to put you here.
ONLY the most powerful government in the world can put you here. It may well make its borders loose also and illegal aliens may be the best candidates to run these things.

22. We already made an unspeakable sacrifice for security we never made before since Bush! Why does he keep telling us that notwithstanding, we will still be attacked by terrorists?

23. If we are still going to be attacked notwithstanding the American people surrendering their liberties and the huge expense of war, why not be given back their liberties, stop the war and be attacked anyway?

24. Which is the only president in American history who constantly tells the American people they are going to be attacked by Middle-Eastern Muslim terrorists, even after horrible security expenses like never before?

25. Which person ever said in amazement, "You know, it's been six full years since our last terror attack!" before Bush became president? Shouldn't even Nostramorock have told Fred Flintstone that an advancing age would come where there would be no terror attacks for six years? Why couldn't Abbott tell Costello about this? What about Ricky Ricardo mentioning this to Lucy? Batman could have made reference of this to Robin?

26. What didn't our grandmothers tell us about their terrible struggle and plight against terrorism before Bush? (All conditions being equal: i.e. Middle Eastern Muslim men were always around while we were yet free, etc.) When did they approach and cry to you about the USS Cole, WTC bombings, etc?

27. Why is it Bush propagandists on forums are telling us that they now feel safer since Bush brought the Patriot Act and is handling the terrorism situation for us, as if they were in anxiety clinics for the entire history of America till Bush came and transformed our security principles and let them out? Why is all America telling us the opposite: that they were basically safe all throughout the history of America, enjoying baseball and apple pie, till Bush came and made some of them now have to attend anxiety clinics to deal with the new problem? If we more and more adopt the principles the Third Reich and Communism always had, wouldn't communists and Nazis among us feel safer to live here?

28. Why do strange people tell us that the Patriot Act is a NEW set of laws that are vital, knowing that this country existed with its entire history without it except for when Bush and vast team came along? Why did the Patriot Act only become so vital during Bush's presidency?

WATERBOARDING!
The men in the picture here are staging demonstrations to PROVE the OLD technique used by the fascist regimes and the Inquisitions called waterboarding is torture. Why they ever have to do this in a country called America, is UNPRECEDENTED!
Mommy, is this torture?

"Presidential experience told us it is not, son! I may use it on you when you hide information from me. Better than giving you the rod and be reported as a child-abuser!"

29. Why did America wait through the entire lives of Lenin, Stalin, Engels, Hitler and even Castro and never ventured to ask them whether or not the technique of waterboarding is torture? Shouldn't they consider that if they asked these brutal dictators that question, they wouldn't be confused today?

30. Why do the strange people refuse to inform us that the principles of the Patriot Act came right out of the Inquisitions of the Middle Ages, and that they were also practiced for the entire history of the Communists and Nazis? [They were virtually never used for any time during the existence of America, but those principles for "security" were used every day in the history of the most brutal regimes who were the worst enemies to America].

31. Why didn't President Bush give credit to the Inquisitions, the Communists and the Nazis for creating and practicing the principles contained in the Patriot Act, but claimed the formulation of it was his, "hard decisions?" Why do they refuse to teach Communists and Nazis the blessings of freedom, but demand we must follow them in security principles long defined as tyranny?

32. If vital information that can save lives is so necessary America can now FOLLOW behind the Communists and Nazis to torture to get it, what good is it when those who claim they must torture for it, can't assimilate the vital information THAT SADDAM DIDN'T CAUSE 911, BUT OSAMA DID?

33. Why did Bush choose to adopt principles of security from the Inquisitions, the Communists and the Nazis in the package of the Patriot Act in order to secure “peace” and “freedom?” Was it because the Inquisitions, Russia, Red China and the Third Reich already acquired “peace” and “freedom?”

34. Why after the Patriot Act was instituted to snoop the American people and true Americans didn't like it, did strange people dare to ask them if they have something to hide?

35. Why then, after Bush refused to testify alone and under oath in an "independent investigation" of the most major internal tragedy to take place against the United States at least a year after the fact, did they not pose the question to Bush of whether or not he had anything to hide? [We remind them to ask him even now, and they pretend we are not asking them anything!]

36. Why do such people chide us, asking us, "Do you see soldiers breaking down your doors!" out of our concern against this old proposal, The Patriot Act, but then staged all kinds of political campaigns telling us that other countries must be preemptively attacked before they commit crimes, showing an abiding concept? Why did they commit even this election fraud? They said we must not wait neither for crimes nor tragedies to take place as an abiding principle.

37. If I claim I am an illegal alien, would I then become undocumented and be exempt from the Patriot Act the American citizens are unfortunate enough to be under? Does something sound wrong with struggling to snoop and document everything about the American people while struggling to make the "undocumented" come here from Mexico or anywhere else?

38. Why after 911, President Bush didn't say, "Because of this attack against our great nation we have to construct devices to snoop for terrorists among the American people?" Why were these devices already constructed?

But not watching your borders!
Would you need such "experience" to be president?

39. Carnivore was introduced to the American people in early 2000 under the tenure of Bill Clinton [Carnivore is a supremely powerful internet gathering tool that extracts all forms of data from the internet and massively archives it]. Why didn't Bush inform us that snooping devices were created under Bill Clinton, but just accepted the transition from a free country to "One Nation Under Surveillance" as seamless as the fight to make sure the American people don't realize there is a global conspiracy?

40. If these devices then were constructed already, were they used before 911 to snoop the American people? If they were not used, how could the government have known that situations would work out where they would be necessary, and yet entirely missed the threat of 911? (Carnivore was revealed to the American people almost two years previous!) If they were used, how could 911 have still taken place and our leaders still inform us that surveillance IS NOW NECESSARY?

41. Should the United States "surrender" its war and attack for WMDs and democracy and be embarrassed before the world? Or should she finally win the war against a defeated and contained dictator under no-fly-zones after six years and be embarrassed before the world?

42. If we started an horrific war for democracy, why do Bush and his propagandists and supporters refuse to tell us what was the message of the last (2006) elections?

43. Since Bush ignored the message of the last (2006) elections while our troops are dying for "democracy,” are they dying in vain?

44. What will the world think of America if she "cowards out" from a war started by brave people who got epileptic seizures by watching a defeated and contained dictator playing with his rubber-ducky in No-Fly-Zones?

45. The war supporters love to call the anti-war people "cowards" to continue the war of aggression. Of the nations called, "The Axis of Evil," why did the brave war supporters choose the weakest and only defeated nation to start a war with?

46. Upon choosing that weak and defeated nation from among, "The Axis of Evil," how is it the brave war supporters spend a tragic six years, over a trillion dollars, and waste the lives of thousands of generations of innocents in the process and have not succeeded yet?

This rather prominent person is rather immortal! He's taken the lives of over 4300 American servicemen, and put America into a 1.5 trillion dollar debt to a Communist country that never held America's best interest.
It may be likely that any other country would waste their time attacking another already defeated dictator.
Saddam Hussein (in the picture above) was not a very good person either!

47. Why is it that the Bush Administration is the only single regime that can be used as public record statistics to show a measurement of the power of already defeated dictators for future reference? How is the world to know already defeated dictators are invincible, unless some nutjob attacks one?

48. Would the legacy of the Bush administration compel you to go to mortuaries to attack the corpses there so that you can be hailed as a victorious warrior and acquire a massive adrenaline rush? How long will it take you to understand that corpses in mortuaries are invincible?

49. How would Bush supporters celebrate if we won this terrible 6 year struggle against an already defeated dictator in new realms of laughingstock-ism?

50. Will all the time, money, and lives the Bush Administration put into fighting this false war against a defeated and contained dictator, embolden the terrorists?

51. Why after six years have the war supporters not defeated the weakest and defeated nation of the "Axis of Evil" Did their use of landfills and Walter Reed Clinics against their own troops have something to do with it?

52. Would you nominate President Bush for a Nobel Peace Prize for shedding so much blood?

53. If not, would you nominate him for a Nobel War Prize for struggling 6 yrs against an already defeated dictator and can't win?

54. If you were tired of wrestling for years with an old computer, wouldn't it be refreshing to get an upgrade or a new one? If you were tired wrestling 6 years in a war against an already defeated dictator, wouldn't it be refreshing to upgrade and attack another nation that was not already defeated? (Iran?)

How can we afford to attack Iran in the face of the thought-police propagandists all over the internet constantly posting how we're insane? If we did that, wouldn't Iran become...

DEFEATED?

Wouldn't the Jesuit propagandists that now dominate the government and all societies of America and most other governments, then turn white with fear?

55. How come the best two ways to terrify someone in treason is to show him a defeated dictator contained under no-fly-zones, or to demand that all his testimony must be given under oath??

56. How is it that President Bush could not notice his father's memoirs giving a very crucial warning against invading Iraq? Why were those Bush, Sr. memoirs so correct?

President Bush, Senior, from his memoirs:
Trying to eliminate Saddam ...would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad, and, in effect, rule Iraq.

Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the UN's mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish.

Had we gone the invasion route, the US could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land.

57. How much of the bankrupting billions funds for war for invisible WMDs did our troops get?

58. How do humans forge on to "success" and "victory" in false war for WMDs and mistaken attack against an already defeated Muslim nation?

59. Does the following sound reasonable: Adolf Hitler walks into an auditorium filled with his opponents and cries, "I want you all to submit a PLAN to solve the tragedies I caused, or get da hell out da way!! Yah!!" In other words, if no one HAS A PLAN that can solve the astounding tragedies he caused, no one has credibility but himself who caused the tragedies, and all must get out of the way so that he can continue to make the tragedy get worse.

60. If the Democrats can't submit a plan for terror or war to compare with Bush's, just then compare his terror plan with every other president before him! Now, what did Bill Clinton tell you was his terror plan when you asked him?

61. You did ask Clinton for a terror plan, didn't you? Bush Sr.? Reagan? You did ask them, huh? What, you didn't??? If not, then why not? [They didn't because no other president failed the American people to have terrorism actually touch them, like Bush.]

62. Why do people do everything but tell us in a free country that people must not believe there is a conspiracy.

63. Why don't those who struggle to make sure the American people stop saying there is a conspiracy do anything against the leaders to make them to understand that persistent, growing daring and unprecedented suspicious activity, coverups and constitutional tampering will make people believe there is a conspiracy?

64. Why is every clear act of treason or coverup labeled, "mistake," "botch-up," or "error?" If all those escalating botch-ups and mistakes suddenly vanish after Martial Law comes, will people then be able to understand that there's a conspiracy?

65. America can't seem to capture Osama Bin Laden even though she is still yet free! Are you sure she will also not be able to catch you if Martial Law is installed?

66. Why did the American forefathers believe there was a global conspiracy, and why did this cause them to insert the Second Amendment to arm citizens against the federal government just in case, and become "isolationists?"

67. Why do such people claim we are paranoid to believe that a conspiracy exists, and stake much time and pain to get us out of that, and remained silent when Bush saw a contained and defeated dictator overseas and started war with him on the premise that he would destroy America and that it must be saved?

68. Why don't strange participants on internet forums first state to everyone that they must not believe there is a conspiracy and state why? What is it on the internet that wakes them up everywhere and approach anyone who writes about that to then start a relentless insult campaign against them? (None of those forums state on the forum rules you must agree with thought police, nor that you cannot honestly believe there is a conspiracy in a free country.)

69. Why then do lies, coverups and activities against the Constitution of the United States then escalate so much notwithstanding certain people get tortured by "conspiracy theorists?" How come those who can't sleep because the "Conspiracy theorists" are around are the ones responsible for the suspicious activity growing hour after hour?

70. How come in every single case reported of voter fraud, irregularity or cheating, the only party mentioned responsible for it is the Christian "family values" party, the Republicans, while the amoral liberal class, the Democrats, were always innocent? Are creative forms of cheating crucial in re-electing George W. Bush?

Should terrorists get trials in a free country? Other than Osama, how did you know they were terrorists before one? How would you know if you actually are NOT one after Bush or one of his subordinates accuses you of being one or colluding with any?

71. Why, after so many Americans--even by vote--struggle to stop this "democracy-loving" president from shedding Arab and Muslim blood, does Osama and the other terrorists reward them by spending so much time, effort and money to attack everyone else except that "democracy-loving" president? Why attack those who try to stop that "democracy-loving" president, knowing this will make the national leaders who make decisions against Islam and Arabs much more powerful? Bush then made an illegal war against an Arab nation taking far more lives than 911.

72. What will happen to the Arab and Muslim agenda, and when will mission be accomplished for them by attacking the American people and American soldiers instead of the leaders? When President Bush becomes an absolute dictator? [He claims power even above the Constitution of the United States especially after terror attacks that he fails to protect the American people from.]

73. Why do Bush propagandists all over the internet evade and pretend we're not asking them when they plan to urge Bush to go after Osama? They conspicuously show that they want Osama to remain free.

74. Why then, in the month of June 2008 did Barrack Obama claim that he doesn't want Osama to be a martyr for whatever reasons he mentioned, but didn't have a problem with Saddam being one? Should Osama live because he attacked America and Saddam must die because he did not?

75. Why then would propagandists laugh at the prospect of "terrorists" having trials, claiming it would be ridiculous for Osama Bin Laden to have a trial, after allowing Saddam Hussein a trial and proper due process above the Patriot Act? Why can't anyone see this is the monumental proof that the Patriot Act, never used nor needed before in America, is not needed now? Can't you understand that Saddam got a privilege denied to the American citizens since one president failed to protect beyond precedent?? If even Saddam got due process, it is quite clear that ANYONE CAN!

76. Why do we give much more respect to these terrorists and believe they are so much smarter when, some 45 years ago, terrorists took care of President John F. Kennedy in such a way that he was much much weaker in contrast today with terrorists who attack everything else but President Bush and thence make him much, much stronger?

77. If interrogations and even secret ones are important to protect us from terror, as the Bush team claims, why do they themselves spit on the practice and show that they are actual hindrances?

Watch Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez spit on the practice of interrogations without shame before the entire globe and play the Jesuit in just the same way as the strange posters on the internet who condone genocide:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye2afa8vvi4&eurl

Schumer on Ashcroft in Youtube

(He was being asked questions not even directly related to terrorism. Notice how he constantly repeats giving replies that don't answer the questions).

78. From what we see in last question showing Alberto Gonzalez evading answering some of the simplest questions without shame in front of the entire globe (like the massive propaganda team on the internet that would jump on you if you believe in a free country that there's a global conspiracy), why do thought police approach us and tell us we dare not assume that because of that, the Bush team is involved in any kind of treason?

79. Why then did these same thought police remain quiet when Bush brought the Patriot Act and claimed he can ASSUME that any American is a terrorist or is involved with terrorists, and then can become a detainee and held without charge indefinitely? Why is the Bush team allowed to assume anything against billions, and their vast propaganda team go irate if we ASSUME anything about Bush or his close comrades?

80. Can Schumer, interviewing Alberto Gonzalez, and the entire Congressional panel then assume Gonzalez is guilty and punish him based upon his complete disrespect of the reviewing process and the entire globe LIKE ALL THE JUDGE SHOWS ON TV OBVIOUSLY WOULD?

81. If not, CAN DETAINEES RESPOND IN JUST THE SAME WAY AS GONZALEZ DOES AND THEN MUST BE FREED FROM ALL GUILT AND ASSUMPTIONS? [Thought police responded by saying the situation is different because detainees are different from our national leaders. Our response was that Bush claims on paper that ANYONE can gain detainee status on his mere whim even though he has had direct ties to every element involved in the 911 disaster (Osama and the Saudis) for years and all America has not!]

82. Is President Bush finally, in the entire history of the globe, the only secretive closed-doors president in history who is not involved in treason?

83. Why did Bush claim that Iran's secrecy about its nuclear program is proof that it's developing nuclear weapons and will not accept Iran claiming it is secret for "national security" concerns or for their necessity to have "executive privilege?" [Remember these were the tactics used for president Bush to make everything about his unprecedented actions appear legitimate and American. He also claimed "executive privilege" when asked to turn over documents revealing why 8 top prosecutors were fired abruptly on the claim their performance was not up to par.]

84. Why, after the American people finally knew the name "Osama Bin-Laden" and the danger he posed to America, did Bush boldly tell them and the globe that he is not going after Osama?

85. Why then do propagandists constantly tell us that Bill Clinton is responsible for 911 and for Osama not being caught as yet? Of the two, only GW Bush boldly told us he is not going after Osama, after the name Osama became a household name. Bush is also the only one who refused to testify alone and under oath during the much obstructed and much belated 911 investigations. How come when Bush propagandists show us letters from soldiers who have died in Iraq, which say they are dying for our freedoms, and we then ask them if they will urge Bush to go after Osama in lieu of the horrific loss of life, they go silent and conspicuously evade? [We keep asking them about this and they ignore us and evade, SHOWING CONSPICUOUSLY THAT THEY ALSO WANT OSAMA TO REMAIN FREE!] Are these the same ones blaming Bill Clinton for 911 claiming that he let Osama run free?

86. Why do people tell us that 911 took place because former President Bill Clinton failed to protect us? They claimed he was laxed on terror.

87. Why then was former President Bill Clinton more stringent against terrorism than all the other presidents before him?

88. How come then the more backward we go into history is the more laxed each administration was against TERROR, and yet the more terrorism didn't bother us? [Even the word was not in the textbooks or anywhere else when Grandma was growing up. Acts of war were known, but any claim that the sky was falling because of Middle Eastern terrorists and thence the Constitution needs to be trashed by the crusaders against paranoia did not take place, and neither did the Patriot Act: a "vital" law that was missing for the entire spread of the existence of the United States, and that comes only with Bush and any other New World Order regime change devotee. All such principles for security were only adopted by the Communists, Nazis and other brutal regimes in contrast to America].

89. Why couldn't terrorists have thought to attack us internally before? [They did, but couldn't. All positions of protection were mostly staffed by true Americans. Also Middle Eastern Muslim extremists feared a backlash from a major superpower with their hands filled with Israel enough as it was. They feared more blood would be taken by the United States than they would take. More importantly, their leaders feared death either for being cowardly, or because they believed if they were killed, their cause for global treason would be destroyed. The situation changed when our national leaders actually had ties to these Muslim terrorists and now their Muslim leaders give the terrorists and suicide bombers orders to do the unthinkable. The Muslim leaders order their servants to do it anyway, knowing these leaders themselves will escape harm, even though generations of Muslims will be killed in consequence: betrayal against Muslims by their leaders also.]

90. Why do such people teach us that a president now unprecedented in failing to protect the American people must be made a king and rewarded for failing to protect us unlike all the other presidents before him?

91. If Bush is so fabulously rewarded for failing to protect us, why should even future presidents want to protect us? How come every other president before him couldn't think of just failing to protect us so that they can acquire powers even above the Constitution and possibly become dictators? [The reason they couldn't is because they didn't have so many others saturated throughout the government and infiltrated into all political parties that would allow such things.]

92. Since Bush is being so fabulously rewarded for failing to protect us, how are we going to honor those presidents before him who did not fail to protect us? Should they then be condemned instead?

93. If you wanted to hire a security guard to protect your business or home, what would be your response to one at the door who tells you he will give you 911 quality security for your interests?

94. Are you prepared to accept the fact that if security guards struggle for employment from the Bush supporters to protect their interests and tell the Bush propagandists that they will offer them 911 quality security for their interests, the Bush propagandists will hire them and make them king over all their affairs?

95. Besides the massive propaganda team, why were the American people afraid to vote for John Kerry because they felt he was weak on security issues when George Bush failed to protect the American people unprecedented in the entire history of America?

96. Why did President Bush become paranoid over the threat Iraq that we beat so badly in Operation Desert Storm could pose, when, in the late 70s while I was in college, I was informed that the surveillance capabilities of America were good enough to see a basketball on the ground from space? And we still couldn't know that Iraq had no WMDs? Iraq didn't have these advantages of aerial surveillance against us, but Bush told us that even if no WMDs were there, he would have attacked Iraq anyway in order to "SAVE AMERICA!" People are forgetting that direct quotation.

97. Why did Bush tell us that torture is necessary for extracting information that could save lives, and therefore included it in his security and foreign policies, AND YET FORGOT TO TORTURE SADDAM TO EVEN REVEAL WHERE HIS WMDS WERE STASHED??? [He named Saddam as the main man in terror! On paper, every American is lower than Saddam and will not receive the due process he received! Bush didn't torture Saddam to reveal where he stashed his WMDs obviously because Bush knew Saddam had none! Saddam didn't suffer from the Patriot Act at all! Is it therefore that necessary? Saddam was caught and was in our hands. Others were tortured by us.]

98. If it is a fact that only a perfect man is eligible to be given the right to destroy people based merely on an accusation without due process, why does the High Court and Congress determine--especially as shown through the confirmation of Sam Alito to the court--that President Bush must have these rights based upon failing to protect the American people without precedent???

99. LIES COST TIME, MONEY, AND BLOOD!...

Ted Bundy, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly: which of these men cost America the least amount of time, effort, money, heartache AND BLOOD?

100. Why do such people then demand that no one must attack Bush, for that makes him a "BUSH-HATER?" And that then once pronounced a Bush-hater, all Bush's actions are justified?? Did Adolf Hitler receive these benefits in the same way also?

101. Why after people protest the unprecedented reign of GW Bush, propagandists stand up and scream they are "bashing America?" Will such people have detainment camps big enough to wipe the 2006 protest vote "against America" out of history? The 2006 vote was a protest vote against President Bush, NOT against America!

102. What did Bush do wrong, other than kill our sons and daughters for invisible WMDs and still yet does not blush, but claims he must be made king?

Before the Inquisitions return upon the earth again by the Antichrist, it will start THIS WAY!

103. How is it that the more our sons and daughters die to "defend our freedoms," is the more the Bush propagandists on the internet are talking about Martial Law coming and detainment camps?

104. Why does Bush and Blair keep saying that "history will prove" the Iraq War was the right thing to do, AFTER we used valuable resources searching for WMDs and never found them? Isn't it a bummer that we used principles for security directly right out of even ancient history to deal with all this and to frame our security principles? Is it true history didn't yet prove that principles for security from the Communists and Nazis would lead to disaster?

105. Isn't it a pity we can't tell that history already proved that following the communist and Nazi regimes will only lead to disaster, but the people from there ordering us back to those principles can only keep telling us we have to wait so history can prove it again? Should we carry tape recorders with us into detention camps when Martial Law comes and play it to the government when they prepare to tell us while in there, that history will prove all they have done was the right thing to do?

106. Why has "doing what I believe is best for the country" includes swearing an oath of allegiance to the Constitution with every intent to completely disregard it? Why has this replaced obedience to the Constitution being sworn to? What then if everything messes up? After everything messes up, will those who do this recognize that it's their hatred of the Constitution that made everything mess up?

107. Mr. Tony Blair and Mr. Bush: Did you know that every fascist regime had leaders who always did what they thought was best for their countries?

108. Why do propagandists on the internet constantly telling us President Bush is the best president we ever had with unique principles that are the best ever to handle terrorism, never show us the posts they made on the internet with concern for terrorism before Bush came?

109. Why do treasonous leaders and propagandists everywhere attack us claiming we have a "pre-911 mentality" to actually expect that the government is supposed to have the power to protect us from terrorists, and urge us to give that up now?

110. Why are those in treason constantly telling us we cannot afford to have the "pre-911 mentality" of giving trials to terrorists, AFTER ALREADY TELLING US THROUGH THE PATRIOT ACT THAT ANYONE CAN ACQUIRE TERRORIST STATUS ON THE WHIM OF THE ONLY PRESIDENT WE KNOW OF WHO HAS HAD BOTH TIES TO OSAMA BIN LADEN AND THE SAUDIS?

111. Does Susan Williams believe terrorists should actually have trials?? Answer: NO! Terrorists should not be given civilian trials!

A terrorist is supposed to be someone WHO ALREADY HAS BEEN OPENLY TRIED AND THEN FOUND TO BE A TERRORIST! If he's a terrorist before a free and open trial, then someone who accused him DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THE AMERICAN PRINCIPLE THAT ALL ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!

112. What kind of absolute jackass would support making sure terrorists don't get trials or humane treatment without first making sure the Patriot Act doesn't have the ability to make any American acquire that status for any reason the President wants? It couldn't be the American citizens, could it? You would support making sure terrorists don't get trials while the Patriot Act claims you can be declared one for any reason the most failing president in US history wants??

113. How come treason then constantly insists they can torture and do anything they want with any "terrorist" WHILE MAKING SURE THEY AVOID EXPLAINING TO THE PEOPLE HOW THE PERSON WHO IS A TERRORIST GOT THAT STATUS? If there is to be no trials, how did the terrorist become a terrorist?

Because of corporate treason, as the Antichrist grows stronger, people with much experience in politics will be making "mistakes" so bad, it would be better to elect the inexperienced who even earn minimum wage!
IF YOU CAN IMPEACH THESE AND THE ENTIRE CONGRESS BOTH DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, [Independents too!] THEN, AND ONLY THEN, CAN PRESIDENT BUSH BE IMPEACHED!

Treason of the Supreme Court, the United Nations, and Congress

114. Why didn't the Supreme Court realize that "Conspiracy Theorists" would have allowed an election recount if votes are not sure instead of becoming paranoid and stopping a recount and then sending propaganda periodicals to tell us that Bush would have won anyway?

115. Why did the Supreme Court finally realize that President Bush overstepped his authority at Guantanamo Bay acquired through failing to protect the American people, when even multitudes of mentally retarded folk figured that out a long time ago? Is one requirement for the High Court to have bad reflexes?

116. Why does the Supreme Court, realizing the many unprecedented mistakes of President Bush to even the embarrassing starting of an illegal war in paranoia, looking for invisible WMDs to the taking of multitudes of lives, still struggle to maintain the right to make him a dictator and give the whole farm over to him?

117. How come the Supreme Court and Congress cannot understand that Bush has a talent to give inaccurate information to billions of people?

118. Why then would they want to empower him to destroy a person merely by making an accusation considering the accuracy of much of what he says? He doesn't make "mistakes?" Why then forbid any of his victims under accusation to prove he has made any?

119. Do members of the High Court and Congress know that the "Conspiracy Theorists" would have gotten rid of any government official who has a talent of giving inaccurate information a long time ago, and that promises, government aspirations and records cannot survive if one in the highest office is proud to habitually give inaccurate information to the globe?

120. Why didn't the High Court nor Congress consider it strange that Bush actually proudly showed pictures of 911 for his re-election campaign since Bush failed to protect the American people on that fateful day? Is this action supposed to communicate the same kind of grief Bush showed when he stood up on the pulpit of 911, and with tears stated that he will destroy all evil and that all who are not with us are with the terrorists?

121. Why didn't the High Court nor Congress consider it strange that a president would claim the powers of a king for failing to protect the American people? Would any future president claiming credit for protecting America be condemned?

122. Who would think there is a conspiracy and why would our national leaders hyperventilate because Americans at least believe there is a global one when the country saw only one politician voted against the institution of the Patriot Act after 911, and then only because HE READ THE PROPOSALS FIRST???

123. Why did the Democrats fail to mention all during the 2006 campaign that "impeachment is off the table," and that they would rather work with the problem (Bush) instead?

124. Why did they claim they will not "take revenge" on President Bush, giving a precedent where it would be prudent for American government to release all prisoners in jail because it was unbecoming of the government to "take revenge" on them?

125. Why were the Democrats so eager to betray the American people, till they couldn't even wait till they sat in their seats of power, but unleashed that they would not impeach president Bush just after the election results?

126. Why did House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, on July 17, 2008, call President Bush a "total failure" in his presidency, after heading a Congress that constantly gave him everything he wanted not since day one, BUT EVEN BEFORE DAY ONE? [Before they even sat in power, just after the elections of 2006, the newly elected Democratic Congress suddenly started to say that they will not impeach President Bush, but would work with him. This shocking news they avoided to let the people know during the entire campaign for their election. Since that shocking announcement, they kept that promise better than any other they had made. Why therefore does Nancy Pelosi claim President Bush is a failure when President Bush SUCCEEDED almost 100% in getting them to do what he wants?]

127. Why did the Democrats suddenly acquire the reasoning of President Bush after they were elected to finally check him, and began to say that they could not defund the war and therefore leave our soldiers out there ill-equipped? If even janitors were elected to de-fund the war and then kept their campaign promises, would they then leave the troops out there after the war is defunded? INSANITY!

128. Why did Al Gore willingly concede defeat to the 2000 elections that were wrested from him, and then now urges that President Bush must not be impeached because trying to do so would not be successful? Why has John Kerry done the same? (This great nation came into being by humble people who saw no true means of succeeding the vast job of creating it, but claimed it was the right thing to do anyway and moved ahead undaunted!)

NANCY PELOSI: "Bush, you are a FAILURE as a president!
At least you got everything you wanted from me 100% of the time even against the wishes of the American people! It's a good thing you didn't ask me for any other favors!"

129. Why then don't the American people understand that Bush cannot be impeached without the same being done to the High Court Justices, Republican members of Congress and most Democratic members of Congress?

130. Why do members of the other branches of government constantly claim that Bush can't be impeached because he is too powerful? Why can't the American people teach them that it is their job description to check the executive branch of government to make sure he doesn't get "too powerful" so they can get a good job approval rating that justifies their high salaries? Would they be willing to change the requirements for office, step aside and hire janitors to do what they are supposed to? Would the janitors fail?

131. If we consider that, for some strange reason, we have been rather free of terror attacks before Bush, could it be because terrorists had something to fear because of all the other presidents before Bush?

132. What then could have ended the fear terrorists had of American presidents when Bush came besides Bush's strong efforts to sell our ports over to the United Arab Emirates who financed 911?

133. How come because of Bush's failure to protect the American people, all the American people are automatic suspects to terrorism when he is the only person most Americans know of who has actual family ties to terrorists? [The Bin Laden family and the Saudis.]

134. If Russia suddenly attacked and destroyed Canada (hypothetically) on our borders because they thought Canada had WMDs, and after finding they were wrong, did not blush but remained as an occupying power, should America arm itself? Should America meddle? Why is it that the High Court, Congress and the United Nations can't understand that Iran has a right to do this? Do you think America should meddle or arm herself if Russia destroyed Canada? Why does the High Court, Congress and the United Nations still believe there is no consequence for starting a false war of aggression after insulting and ignoring massive forces that struggled to stop them from making the mistake? How come we never heard much about this situation with Iran's nuclear program before the Constitutionally illegal Iraq War?

135. Why is the Bush Administration covering up the destruction of CIA tapes documenting aggressive interrogation techniques by the government against suspected terrorists?

136. The government said they had to destroy the tapes, or else the identities of the interrogators could become known and they could be jeopardized. Would that then make these interrogators acquire the status of Valerie Plame? [She was the woman who was a CIA operative whose identity was compromised by the Bush Administration. Her husband was critical of the Bush Administration.]

137. Should we interrupt Osama having Thanksgiving dinner to ask him whether he feels President Bush has been a great success in American security? If not, then how about next Thanksgiving?

138. Besides the Third Reich, is there another regime that would start wars in order to "save innocent lives" and then take much more innocent lives?

139. What is the secret to Bush's very strong desire to "save innocent lives" all over the world? If you were able to acquire his Skull & Bones insignia, would you then acquire the same desire to start wars to save innocent lives? [It's the same insignia the Nazis war on their uniforms].

A MESSAGE FROM THE THIRD REICH!...

"BIG DEAL! We also used war to save innocent lives and took much more than our enemies we had to stop, Mr. Bush! You ain't got nothin' on us!"

140. Since Saddam was ruthless and took much innocent life, what happened to the scorecards and statistics of innocent lives being lost after Bush decided to walk in the steps of Nazis? What percent reduction of lives lost did we gain?

141. If ghosts are real, why do they always forget to haunt people of the likes of Ted Bundy, Osama Bin Laden, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin or George Bush and the Congress?

142. How come, with all of this, those who still insist we must not know there is a conspiracy, struggle to make sure that these clearly treasonous activities escalate day after day after day?

The Invalidity of the 911 Independent Investigations

143. Why did such people allow and fight to make us believe it is normal for an "independent investigation" of the most major internal tragedy in the United States to take place at least a year after the event? Why are they determined no one must believe there is something wrong with this? (The proper way to handle all tragedies is to stage thorough investigation right away. That way evidence is fresh and people interviewed will make statements that can be matched with their later statements to test their coherency.) ["Conspiracy theorists" would have allowed the late investigation to get as much information as possible, but would have declared the whole endeavor basically INVALID for being staged so late!]

144. Why do such expect us to believe that under the weight of 3,000 graves, the president who failed to protect them can refuse to testify cleanly under oath at the investigation that took place so much later, and wound up finally testifying not under oath, but at the same time with the second most honest person in the world (Dick Cheney) does not give fuel to the big bad ol' "conspiracy theorists?" Just the weight of 3,000 graves would force any American to testify trembling, let alone their protector supposed to give them protection they paid high taxes for!

The Cost of Energy Tripled Since the Bush Administration

145. Why, since the Bush Administration, did fuel prices uniquely get so high and the American people can't figure out why, even though Bush struggled to sell our ports over to the United Arab Emirates who were involved in financing 911? Why can't even fuel prices regularly falling only at election time, convince certain people that a certain person bears heavy responsibility?

146. Supply, demand, developing China, developing India, offshore oil drilling restrictions, weak dollar, record fuel prices quadrupled that lowers every time Bush is in elections: Only one of these things came after Bush became president. Can you figure out which? Why did supply, demand, China, India, offshore oil drilling restrictions and a weak dollar wait for Bush to arrive to produce record fuel prices quadrupled?

147. Who would make the American people vote for an oilman for president and then have no idea why fuel prices would triple above all history?

The South American Country of Paraquay

148. Why did President Bush become the only American president to have an interest in and buy thousands of acres of land in the South American country of Paraquay? [That country is famous for granting asylum to war criminals and Nazis. Even Bush's daughters are learning to speak Spanish over there!]

149. Why doesn't Bush know that country is famous for harboring Nazi war criminals and therefore put that country on his hitlist for the Global War on Terror?

150. Why, before buying land in the South American country of Paraguay, did Bush first secure an agreement that he and heavily armed soldiers with him be not tried for war crimes? Why no desire to clear his name? If he knows already that he's a war criminal, why can't his propagandists figure it out?

NEW 02/18/2007 RENEGADES TO NEOCONISM FOUND?

AFTER BUSH AND HIS NAZIS TELL US THEY WILL STAGE FALSE WARS FOR WMDS AND DEMOCRACY, A TRAITOR IN THEIR CULT EMBARRASSES THEM. WHO COULD THAT BE?
President Bush, Senior, from his memoirs:
Trying to eliminate Saddam ...would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad, and, in effect, rule Iraq.

Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the UN's mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish.

Had we gone the invasion route, the US could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land.

ANOTHER NEOCON HERE CONFESSES THAT FALSE WAR FOR DEMOCRACY AS BUSH SAID, IS NOT REALLY EVEN FOR THAT!

NEOCON:
Liborats: US NEOCONS DON'T CARE WHAT THE WORLD THINKS! WE ARE NOT IN FOR POLLS!!!

FRANCE/GERMANY/RUSSIA/CHINA STABBED US IN THE BACK! THEY ARE NOT OUR FRIENDS, SO WHO CARE WHAT THEY THINK!!!

THIS ISN'T A POPULARITY CONTEST! THIS IS WAR AGAINST RADICAL ISLAM - WHO WANTS TO KILL US EITHER WAY!

'There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat to the United States and to our allies.', Howard Dean, September 2002

NEW 02/18/2007 Jesuits keep posting that the House voted against President Bush's troop surge and therefore voted against the lives and safety of our troops. Those who posted that were among the unprecedented who actually made soldiers go into harm's way without adequately protecting them. This condition persisted even though Americans were protesting for a long time. Soon one soldier was brave enough to fight through the lack of freedom of speech and asked Donald Rumsfeld why they have to dig in landfills for bodyarmor protection. The Republican Party then wound up attacking and even making public statements against that soldier, claiming he just wanted to embarrass Bush.

Therefore, when the House voted against the troop surge in Iraq, did they vote against the troops? Or did they vote against Halliburton!

How much of the bankrupting billions in false war funds looking for invisible wmds did our troops get?
NEW 02/12/2007 Jesuits persistently post that they thank God for president Bush, since they can now sleep safe without ever having to worry about terror!
In response, we facetiously posted that we needed to attend anxiety clinics all through history in fear of terrorism until Bush came along!

NEW 02/12/2007 Jesuits now keep posting that Iran must be attacked? Why? For meddling with the Iraq War.

Question: Does Iran have the right to "meddle" in any unjust war that is taking place on her borders?

Answer: Does America have the right to "meddle" in any unjust war taking place along her borders?

02/02/2007Jesuits still struggle to mask their support for genocide and the worst terrorist threats known to our times that used to control the globe during the Inquisitions! Let's see their excuses this time!

Jesuits on the forums are made aware of the horrible postings of SHAN, who wrote plainly that billons of people must die because they're not Catholic. As we have shown, Jesuits will see those threats and have sustained a flawless record at only verbally attacking those who don't like those declarations, or working to dismiss them outright. Here is the latest example:

AMERICA1NUMBER:
TEDMACK.....

FIRST OF ALL THEY DONT SOUND LIKE TRUE CHRISTIANS, SECOND I DONT EVEN BELIEVE THEY ARE CHRISTIANS, MORE LIKELY A BUNCH OF HATEFUL LEFTIES POSING AS CHRISTIANS ON THE NET....LOL.....NICE TRY THOUGH....ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THESE PEOPLE REPRESENT JESUS DONT KNOW ABOUT THE RELIGION.....

TEDMACK:
DID THE COLUMBINE STUDENTS SOUND LIKE TRUE CITIZENS? IS THAT A REASON TO AGREE WITH THEIR STATEMENTS??
DID THE NEWS SAY THEY ARE TO BE IGNORED OR AGREED WITH, JESUIT AMERICA1NUMBER?

MAYBE WE COULD HAVE SAID THAT IRAQ IS NOT A TRUE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY AND JUST LAUGH. RIGHT JESUIT AMERICA1NUMBER!!

NEW 02/02/2007DOES OUR PROVERBIAL COMMUNIST ENEMIES WASTE AWAY THEIR MILITARIES FOR FALSE WARS??

After being our persistent enemies and by principle existing with the agenda to destroy liberty, does Russia or China stage false wars and persist to wear away their militaries? We better hope they have changed, cause if they have not...

WE ARE IN DEEEEEP DOO DOO!

"War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in thirty or forty years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The Western world will need to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There shall be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate to their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist."
(Dmitrii Z. Manuilskii) (Lenin School of Political Warfare, Moscow, 1931).

One poster remarked that the Soviet Union wasted away their military in the Afghanistan war. You must understand that as our societies are all infiltrated, the reasons for war become more an agenda to get rid of undesirable soldiers. In the case of the war in Aghanistan, time tells that visualizing freedom has affect even on some soldiers found in Communist countries.

The loss of soldiers in the former Soviet Union, we believe, was really no loss to the people who put them in harm's way.

NEW 01/31/2007 Lie that Clinton caused 911 debunked!

Updated 12/22/2007
The sting of Osama came after Clinton with a direct attack against America! He was not regarded then as he is regarded now. Hardly any American could say they knew who Osama Bin Laden was before 911.

But he was a bad man and Clinton failed to apprehend him? There are many other bad men and people out there. Who is Clinton to overlook? I assure you there are many Bush is overlooking now and has overlooked even in North Korea! That's why no one even reminded Bill Clinton to go after Osama when he was president. Any candid street interviewer or reporter asking a typical American who Osama Bin Laden was before 911 would have been told that he doesn't know and that he doesn't need to care.

It was after Osama stung America that his name was known and his true potential as an American enemy was known. Then, when Osama stung America, was the time to lie and complain about Clinton letting him go free before President Bush then let 911 through!

THEN AFTER 911, ALL THE MORE, BUSH IS THEN SUPPOSED TO CORRECT ANY IMAGINARY MISTAKES AND CAPTURE OSAMA! Osama then showed he was dangerous. Then is when Bush promised to capture Osama "dead or alive." Then is when all America got behind Bush to capture Osama. Then is when Bush PUBLICLY declared he will not go after Osama. Then is when his propagandists move to tell us that Bill Clinton caused 911 by not going after Osama!

Neither Bush nor his propaganda team thought of blaming Clinton back then!

This is more than just bad reflexes.

NEW 01/19/2007 WHAT HAPPENS IF IRAQ STABILIZES TOMORROW??

Updated 12/22/2007: not just 3,000 troop lives lost, but 3,800 now!
WHAT HAPPENS IF IRAQ STABILIZES TOMORROW??

WE ARE LEFT WITH A STAGGERING DEBT AND DEFICIT, more than 3,800 LIVES OF OUR SOLDIERS LOST AND MANY MORE INJURED, MANY INNOCENT IRAQI CIVILIANS KILLED, A PRESIDENT WHO STANDS OUT BY CONSTANTLY TELLING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THEY'RE STILL GOING TO BE ATTACKED BY TERRORISTS...

AND THEN A WHOLE LIST OF OTHER COUNTRIES THAT WILL NEED TO BE FREED!! THE ONES THAT HAVE OIL WILL ALSO SUFFER TECHNIQUES OF "FREEDOM" USING NO-BID CONTRACTS AND OIL DEALS!!

ACTUALLY VERY EASY TO LEAVE IRAQ, EVEN IMMEDIATELY!!
WHAT IS A CHRISTIAN NATION TO DO IF IT FINDS OUT IT UNJUSTLY ATTACKED AN ARAB ONE!

What would Christian Churches teach any Christian nation to do if it finds it made a terrible mistake against Arabs or Muslims? Apologize? Would that help? What about punishing those who caused this war, draining all their finances and putting it toward reparations and punish them in view of the world? Wouldn't that help?

We must stop the war immediately!

Q: But we can't do that! If we do that, aren't terrorists going to use Iraq to attack us?

A: A Christian nation would not worry about that when it attacked Iraq without cause. Are we the only nation in the world that must not be attacked? We attacked them, so we shouldn't worry about being attacked as a response.

As a matter of fact, it is rather odd to claim that terrorists would think of attacking us if we get out of Iraq immediately. Bush claimed that they attacked us at 911 because they hated us because we were free. That means they always hated us during the tenures of every other presidential administration but could do little about it till Bush came.

It is silly to think that terrorists would finally think of attacking us now, just because we attacked an Arab nation without cause without ever blushing, giving the signal that our leaders intend on genociding all Arabs and Muslims. Of course they would attack us, just like every other time since we got into their 4,000 year contentions and favored Israel over them! Every other president made us not to worry about that.

NEW 01/25/2007

Bush: Only president in history who keeps telling Americans they're going to be attacked by terrorists!!

How did Lucille Ball, Judy Garland, Abbott & Costello, Jerry Lewis, Dean Martin, James Brown, Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck ...<on and on ad infinitum> deal with this insurmountable problem?? What techniques did they use for security? What did the newspapers and magazines say about this problem that arose with Bush? What about the Children's show, the Little Rascals?

Once upon a time, the Little Rascals decided to play hookie from school. They therefore planned to go fishing.

They were enjoying themselves until Spanky appeared troubled. Alfalfa immediately noticed and asked Spanky what was the matter. Spanky replied:

"I'm just worried about another terror attack! You just never know when it can happen again."

Alfalfa, quickly trying to comfort him replied:

"Don't worry about that. Remember, we have had no terror attacks for the last six years! That's something to marvel about!"

Spanky then cheered up, smiled, and said, "YYEEAAAHH!! What a wonderful president we have!

Bush Policy In Tragic Metaphors:
IF I BEAT YOU UP FOR RAPING MY WIFE (Saddam), AND WHILE I'M BEATING YOUR BRAINS OUT, I FIND OUT YOU DIDN'T ACTUALLY DO IT... (Osama did!)

HOW WOULD I LOOK TO THE WORLD IF I "SURRENDER??" AND "CUT AND RUN?"

I DIDN'T CARE WHEN EVERYONE FOUND OUT YOU DIDN'T DO IT! (Found out Saddam didn't have WMDs or staged or planned the 911 attack!) I DIDN'T BLUSH!! SHOULD I NOW ASK HOW THE WORLD OR TERRORISTS WOULD THINK OF ME IF I "SURRENDER" ATTACKING YOU?

NEW 01/14/2007
Condoleeza Rice Shows What Bush "Democracy" Is!!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16606866/
Jan. 13, 2007

Rice: "U.S. not ‘pulling the plug’ on Iraq"

[Condoleeza Rice is being informed that in the Iraqi War "for Democracy" the American people clearly do not approve and want the troops home.]

She decried what she called “the notion ... that, ‘Are you just going to pull the plug?”’

“We’re not pulling the plug on Iraq,” she said.

Most Americans now say they do not support the war or approve of Bush’s handling of it.

“What will convince the American people that there’s going to be a good outcome here is changes on the ground,” Rice said. “No poll is going to change until there is something to show.”

[Therefore in Bush "Democracy" we start wars to support Democracy. Although actions are not approved by the people, they still must continue just so long as the American people are told they still have to wait even years to actually see results, until they will eventually approve whether they like it or not! Just like they will have to look for WMDs until they are eventually found!! Rice translated: "We must do what the American people don't like or want anyway! They will eventually have to approve!!"]

UNCONTESTED PROOF SADDAM HAD NO WMDS! Updated 1/30/2007
Everyone agrees Saddam had WMDs, BUT NOT AT THE TIME BUSH DEMANDED HIM TO SURRENDER THEM JUST BEFORE THE WARRANTLESS WAR!! After the war then took place, Saddam didn't use any of the so-called WMDs he is supposed to have to defend himself. He is the "mad dictator," remember? How could someone like that ship his protection away?
HERE IS THE CHRONOLOGY OF BUSH LIES ON THE WAR PROVING BUSH KNEW SADDAM DIDN'T HAVE ANY WMDS!!

Why did this Jesuit again send this lying repeat post? I'm not saying the quotations were lies, but they were answered! The false intelligence and the Bush lies had Dems believing that Saddam was really dangerous in our new age of Anti-PARANOIA, and ANTI-CONSPIRACY THEORISM! Like the Conspiracy theories that Saddam really had WMDs, but shipped them elsewhere till we forgot to torture him to reveal where they went!

But here is the actual proof of Bush lies with the false intelligence that started the unnecessary war:

First Bush said he wanted to be nice and free the Iraqi people from all that oil--I mean tyranny.

Of course, American law forbids that, so a new strategy is needed. Bush then brings up the WMD lie.

Now we're all concerned, and its time to go to war!

What does he call the new war?

Operation WMD Retrieval?

Operation Weapon Disarmament?

Operation De-nukularization?

NO! HE CALLS IT...

OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM!!

It's not the smell of fried chicken in the air!!

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE GOOD 'OL DAYS?
In the days of kings and queens they had armor bearers who were sworn to protect them. If an armor bearer even had to fight 30 men and win at great cost to himself and yet crawl over to where the king was and found him dead, that armor bearer, in shame, would put his head down and kill himself.

3,000 people died at 911 when 3 planes plowed into buildings WITHOUT ANY MILITARY ACCOMPANIMENT WHATSOEVER TO EVEN ASK THEM TO IDENTIFY THEMSELVES! The person who thus failed us has been claiming benefits ever since!! When the 2004 election time came, President Bush proudly showed pictures of 911 where he (the government) was stationed to protect the American people and failed.
President Bush plays the Jesuit card and responds: "So you would have preferred that Saddam remained in power?"
Answer: "No we do not prefer that the N. Korean dictator remain in power or Osama Bin Laden to remain free, along with a whole list of many others you want to remain!"

TYPICAL NAZICON REVENGE!! Updated 01/13/2007
The Democrats are now telling us that impeachment of Bush is "off the table," and they keep psychologically inbreeding into us the idea that if we put Bush under justice, we are merely taking REVENGE! Well it sure looks like we merely took REVENGE on Saddam Hussein, not to mention every regular criminal in our jails!! According to them, in order to protect Bush, JUSTICE is REVENGE only when it needs to be poured out on Bush!!

However, we must now again deal with the "Jesus" party:
If I was a Nazicon and thereby promoted myself to being the best psychiatrist and pharmacist in the world (as they naturally do) and someone rapes my wife at home while I'm not around, what would I do?
I would start a campaign to get "REVENGE" on someone else! I would spend all my funds and go into astounding debt in order to do this. I would then claim I am raging war on all rapists. After my finances are all depleted, I would buy land and a home in Paraguay [South American country famous for protecting fugitive Nazi war criminals. President Bush already bought land there and secured an agreement with that government not to try him for war crimes.] in order to strangely enjoy a lavish lifestyle! No other way to show that I love my wife!

09/29/2006 MORE DISCUSSION EXAMPLES FROM FORUMS: DID ANYONE WATCH THE PRESIDENT ON TV LAST NIGHT?
POSTER WROTE: DID ANYONE WATCH OUR PRESIDENT ON TV? HE WAS COVERING THE WAR ON TERROR! I DID MY OWN LITTLE PROJECT! I COUNTED HOW MANY TIMES DURING HIS SPEECH, HE USED THE WORDS TERROR/TERRORISM/TERRORIST/EXTREMIST!
HERE'S MY FINAL COUNT!

TERROR
    11

TERRORIST
    41

TERRORISM
    4

EXTREMIST
    17

CAN ANYONE GUESS HOW MANY TIMES HE MENTIONED IRAQ?

IRAQ
    1

Poster wrote: If a "Conspiracy theorist" hired a security guard to protect his business and his business was robbed deaf dumb and blind, that "Conspiracy theorist" would get rid of that security guard.

If a Conspirator hired a security guard to protect his business and it was vandalized horribly, the conspirator would heavily promote that security guard and try to make him king over his household also! He would conclude it is necessary to sell the farm over to that security guard, or else there would be no security.

Poster wrote:
The Constitution IS NOT being violated. Under the Constitution, the President and Congress are allowed to perform certain acts in order to preserve the best interest of the country while at war. One thing you've got to remember, the Constitution was written well over 200 years ago, there were no telephones or computers back then, nor did our forefathers have to deal with the same kind of terrorist problems back then that we're experiencing today.

Reply: So the Constitution is not being violated. It is just old and is being discarded!!

So don't worry my friends! Issues are new now with computers...

THAT'S WHY WE MUST GO BACK TO THE NAZI REGIME TO FIND PRINCIPLES FOR SECURITY!

THAT'S WHY WE MUST GO FURTHER BACK TO THE COMMUNISTS!

THAT'S WHY WE MUST GO [even further] BACK TO THE INQUISITIONS!!

Gee, I didn't know computers were around then!!

Poster wrote: During the 1990's under President Clinton, the National Security Agency monitored millions of private phone calls placed by U.S. citizens and citizens of other countries under a super secret program code-named Echelon.

On Friday, the New York Times suggested that the Bush administration has instituted "a major shift in American intelligence-gathering practices" when it "secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for evidence of terrorist activity without [obtaining] court-approved warrants."

But in fact, the NSA had been monitoring private domestic telephone conversations on a much larger scale throughout the 1990s - all of it done without a court order, let alone a catalyst like the 9/11 attacks.
Reply: THANK YOU!!

That is why all this business about eavesdropping to protect us was always baloney! The government was always eavesdropping us and 911 took place anyway.

THE GREATER WEIGHT OF THE PROBLEM OVER WHAT HAPPENED LIES INSIDE THE POSITIONS OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES, RATHER THAN ON MIDDLE EASTERN TERRORISTS!!!

That's why Bush struggled to sell our ports over to the United Arab Emirates who financed 911!!

A poster wrote and asked how come an airplane was able to hit the pentagon with protection from military bases close by. Another responded by saying that fighter planes were close by, but they were not armed.
A major issue in discussion was that even news reports cited that America was considered impregnable to terrorism before President Bush. The propaganda team moved forward swiftly to lie to us concerning this fact.

Reply: That's what I'm saying! He tells us about all these terrorist activities, trying to tell us that the problems were always around even before Bush!

Another then comes and tells us that our war planes were not armed during 911 and therefore did not fly to intercept any of the airplanes used as missiles.

SOMEBODY IS LYING!

They moved to tell us that terrorism was always with us when we even exposed news reports that claimed AMERICA WAS CONSIDERED IMPREGNABLE TO TERRORISTS BEFORE BUSH!

The fact that those planes were unarmed, supports the news reports.

They are so bold to lie to us--sounds familiar--telling us that terrorism was always a problem for us despite the fact that this great internal bickering and war [about the Patriot Act, warrantless spying, etc.] was not present when grandma was even going through school. They said we were not protected because President Bill Clinton was laxed on terror!

Please know and understand that Bill Clinton was more stringent against terrorism than any other president before him. That's the very reason why he proposed his 1995 Omnibus Anti-terrorism proposals which is the forerunner of the Patriot Act and strikingly similar.

NOW, JUST GO BACKWARD IN TIME AND YOU WILL FIND THAT EACH PRESIDENT BEFORE CLINTON WAS MORE AND MORE LAXED AGAINST TERRORISM, AND YET THE MORE TERRORISM DIDN'T BOTHER US!!

DON'T BE FOOLED BY THE TREASON PROPAGANDA TEAM. DON'T BELIEVE THAT BUSH ALONE HAS ALL THE BLOOD ON HIS HANDS. DON'T BELIEVE

The Patriot Act:

A set of laws missing for the entire history of America, but always was present in the Communist and Nazi Regimes, and always in the Inquisitions that came even earlier.

Why then are strange people trying to tell us that the Constitution of the United States, is...

OUTDATED???

Poster Wrote: IN WAR (BUSH) THERE ARE NO RULES!! 01/04/2007
The enemy sure sees it that way! [This statement was made to attack the Geneva Conventions for humane treatment of prisoners of war.]

Reply: Funny, America always had rules even during its two World Wars!! Those wars represent bigger enemies than Iraq! Only the Bush War complained against the Geneva Convention restrictions and helped people to more and more talk about Bush's Nazi background!

IN WAR THERE ARE NO RULES!!

Why did Saddam receive rules and DUE PROCESS??

HOW WAS NEEDLESS IRAQ WAR, "FIGHT FOR FREEDOM?" Updated 01/13/2007
WHY DOES BUSH START WARS FOR DEMOCRACY, AND YET CLEARLY SHOWS HE DOESN'T CARE ABOUT WHAT ANYBODY THINKS OR SAYS?

HE HAS TO TEACH OTHER LEADERS TO CARE WHAT THEIR PEOPLE THINK! BUSH IS UNDER SOME SERIOUS DISAPPROVAL IN AMERICAN POLLS AND WORSE GLOBALLY!

WHY DID HE THEN START HIS FALSE WAR FOR DEMOCRACY/WMDS/NO-BID CONTRACTS TO HALLIBURTON, ETC?

How do we show the world that we will make sure that this must never happen again?

Nazicon wrote:
The Democrat are telling the American people they do not know what they are talking about. All they can do is a knee jerk reaction to our U.S. Executive branch decision to fight for freedom using the best tactic possible. Peloise and Harry want our U.S. military to "pull out" and "retreat" and let the radical Islamic jihadist take over Baghdad. And, they will by terror and force. See examples of terror aggression all around the world. Somalia. The mujahedeen crusade for Islam political rule in doctrine and National rule. Western civilization is their enemy.

Reply:
In the statement above are many intentional and hidden lies. We want the present and future residents of Paraguay to stop telling blind lies and never feel the need to explain the lies that they tell!

How did we fight for freedom by choosing the weakest beaten nation in the world to search for WMDs that were not there, in order to use no-bid contracts to Halliburton? How do we defend freedom by hating soldiers who ask us why they have to dig in landfills for body armor protection to support no-bid contracts to Halliburton??

We ask whether or not the PARANOID concerns if we pull out would have existed if the cause of the problems had listened to most of Americans who told him to instead take paranoia medicine!! If we didn't "mistakenly" attack a defenseless Muslim nation, would this concern have existed? We all believed the false intelligence, but Bush knew better, shown by his calling the war OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM instead of anything to do with WMDs or disarmament.

How come the Nazicons are not thinking of punishing the pre-emptive war follower of the Communists and Nazis (who had the same philosophies) so that the terrorists can even see that there are people in America who believe in fairness and justice? Why would we let Bush retire rich in Paraguay?? Why can't we make gestures of reparations, ridding Bush of all the money from his crimes and dealing with his Fourth Reich propaganda crew?

The Arabs/Muslims are flocking to Iraq because they view the war as an attempt at genociding their race/religion. How are we going to show Muslims that "Christians" are not super-criminals, by telling the world that, despite our needless and false attack to stage no-bid contracts, we must not "SURRENDER" showing that we are Christians?

NAZICONS CLAIM TROOPS WANTING PROTECTION ONLY WANTED TO EMBARRASS BUSH! Updated 01/13/2007

Here is one of the unbelievable people who hated the soldiers for daring to ask Donald Rumsfeld why they have to dig in landfills for body armor protection (as opposed to the well-funded Halliburton!)!!

Words like these could never had been said 60 years ago, for those who said this would meet their deserved fate under America. These Inquisitor statements below are the product of the confusion conspirators among us for decades told us was a benefit to the country...

December 12, 2004

Armor for the troops

Much has been made in the MSM about a question that a young dupe trooper asked Donald Rumsfeld about getting more uparmored Humvees into the thjeater of operations. Greyhawk has a good take on it from the perspective of one who is there and doing that.

One of the points he makes is that no army anywhere has ever gone into battle with everything that they needed, or most certainly, wanted. One of the great strengths of American servicemembers has always been the ability to "make do" and to adapt their equipment with on the ground modifications to suit the needs of the particular theater where they were operating in.

That is not to say that that the government shouldn't ensure that they provide the best and the most equipment possible to the troops at the pointed end of forcefull diplomacy, but to acknowledge that it will never be a perfect system, and there will always be needs unmet, in any exercise of military power.

I sincerely believe that the shortcomings are being addressed, and hopefully overcome, in the shortest possible time.

Why did I call the trooper a dupe? Because he was cajoled into asking the question by an imbed reporter trying to set up a "gotcha" moment so he could write yet another story critical of the war. It was a valid question, but the ensuing coverage reveals the true reasoning behind it wasn't to try to protect the troops, but to try to embarrass the administration yet again.

[CAN YOU IMAGINE THAT THIS SUPER-TERRORIST CLAIMS THE REASON THE SOLDIER ASKED THE QUESTION WAS NOT FOR CONCERN FOR THE TROOPS, BUT TO TRY TO EMBARRASS THE STRANGE PERSON WHO PUT THEM IN HARM'S WAY?? WHY WOULD THIS SOLDIER WANT TO DO THAT, WHEN HE HIMSELF IS ON THE FRONT LINES!! WHEN HE HIMSELF IS IN DANGER, WHY WOULD HE BE ONLY THINKING OF EMBARRASSING A PRESIDENT WHO ALREADY CANNOT BE EMBARRASSED, INSTEAD OF FOR HIS OWN SAFETY??? NOTICE THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES THEN, OF THE SOLDIER MERELY CONSPIRING WITH A REPORTER?]

It was a question from one who hasn't entered the zone yet, maybe the conditions in the zone are aren't what they are in the staging area. The fact that he stated that "they were scounging steel to add to their vehicles" shows that the men higher up are aware of some the problems and are trying to overcome them in a time honored way..Yankee ingenuity.

Soldiers will always bitch about the conditions they are fighting in, and the equipment they are fighting with. That is a military tradition.

[But Halliburton doesn't have to complain about anything!! Conspirators are going to complain about people in a free country believing there is a conspiracy. That is freedom tradition! Who would oppose freedom? Why isn't this person on the front lines with his entire family? Where is the tradition that we enter into an unnecessary war and choose to fund Halliburton before armoring the troops?? Does it come with the "tradition" that we start pre-emptive war, like Adolf Hitler believed??]

They usually come up with ingenious ways to upgrade their equipment on their own to meet their needs and be more in tune with their conditions. That is also a military tradition.

Some MSM sources try to make much of the fact that some troops were sent without adequate body armor. The same MSM that 15 years ago complained that military expenditures were far too high. In my time of service body armor was almost unheard of, other than the "Flackjacket" type issued to some troops in Viet Nam, and found to be highly wanting to the type of operations and environment being fought in.

[Remotely detonate roadside bombs were not put into operation at that time! The Patriot Act was unheard of before President Bush, except in the Inquisitions, the Communists and then the Nazis! For the illegal snooping bill, President Bush said that, "Times have changed!" It was created in 1978!! When will time changing mandate that we must fund Halliburton and then allow troops to beg for body armor?]

The fact is that the technology has been vastly improved in the intervening years and come into much greater use, but this technology is expensive and choices must always be made in military appropiations. Sometimes those choices are wrong, and the grunt on the ground suffers for it. Thats life, get over it.

[He means, THAT'S DEATH! AND ONLY HE AND THOSE LIKE HIM DESERVES IT!! Is there anyway we can get this Jesuit and all his children on the front lines with Bush??? Can we coax him to get over the fact that people will expose treason while he, his children and every other traitor is on the front lines???]

There will always be shortcomings in war. We will get enough armored vehicles/body armor in the theater, and there will arise another shortage item. That is also life.

Civilians always assume that any piece of military gear can be used in any condition for any mission. That is far from the truth. The fact is that if you put enough armor on a Humvee to protect the soldiers within to the greatest extent possible, you'd no longer have a humvee, you'd have an APC. An APC can't do things that a humvee can. Military operations always carry great risk to the personnel involved, there is no way around that other than not engaging in the operations in the first place. Service members know the risks when they join, that is what truly makes them all heroes, knowing the risks and doing the job anyway.

NOT ONLY ARE AMERICAN TROOPS SEALING THEIR OWN DOOM BY PARTICIPATION IN THE MOST COSTLY WAR OF TREASON IN IRAQ... 12/17/06

SO ARE THE INSURGENTS!!

President Bush keeps claiming we have to stay in Iraq because if we don't, insurgents would take over that country and then use that country to stage attacks against us. He tells us we must stay "till completion." His propaganda team on the internet struggle to make us not look back at the cause of this dilemma. They also struggle to tell us there is an end to the Iraq War with persistence: victory. The fact that Bush still stands as president and speaks to the global population despite his record of crimes and lies is also a showcase against the Military, the Supreme Court and all branches of Congress. President Bush from the beginning was cocky because he knew those who supported him dominate all branches of the US Government.

Is this true that there is victory ahead in the Iraq War? Not only is it not true, Bush and his propaganda supporters have different definitions and meaning to the words "completion, " and "victory." Once you understand what their agenda is, you will be able to tell what they mean. The actual meaning of the words "completion" and "victory" in Iraq is THE COMPLETION OF THE DESTRUCTION OF THE LIVES OF PRE-SELECTED CONSTITUTIONAL AMERICAN SOLDIERS WHO LOVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND WHO WILL NOT AGREE TO ENFORCE TYRANNY AGAINST THEM. We are talking about the soldiers who will not agree to reinstall the Inquisitions against the American people and the world. These soldiers are a thorn in the side to our current national leaders, who want to unite with their brothers the Communists and use the global arsenal of nuclear weapons against the global population so that their new Inquisitions can take root and be prosperous. We already have links with strange militant Catholics who posted that the Inquisitions was "the good old days" and days of immense prosperity and security. That is Bush's definition of the words, "peace" and "freedom." He then created The Patriot Act based on principles that came directly from the Inquisitions and were emulated thereafter by the Communist and Nazi governments.

At present the War in Iraq cannot be remedied. Why not? That's because the insurgents, because of the premeditated act of aggression against an Arab country that did not threaten nor attack America, view the war as an outright attempt at genociding either or the Arab race or the Muslim religion. Because of this INSURGENTS ARE CONSTANTLY FLOCKING INTO IRAQ LIKE FLIES TO FIGHT. Only when the entire Arab population and Muslim religion is totally eradicated can anyone clearly state that victory has been won!

Unfortunately, what the insurgents don't know, is by killing off the remaining CONSTITUTIONAL American soldiers, they are destroying the BALANCE OF POWER principle that protected the planet from nuclear weapons. Those soldiers tap into the machinery of death in the United States. If they find out for sure that treason is afoot, they, the CONSTITUTIONAL TROOPS, even though the stark minority, can send a terrible message even to the majority of the military who are currently in treason against the American people! The Communist and Nazi regimes had tremendous talent for INFILTRATING free countries. They incited trouble overseas and caused wars to train Americans into thinking that the enemy is only outside. All the time others of their numbers enter into free countries in the tireless endeavor to secure high positions in those countries. These then thirst for wars and military activity all over the world, because once wars are secured, their numbers in the military BEGIN TO STAGE ATTACKS AGAINST THEIR OWN COMRADES, and, in the case of the Iraq War, made sure those pre-selected for the front lines WERE NOT ADEQUATELY PROTECTED.

Once close to all the CONSTITUTIONAL American soldiers are destroyed to "completion" and "victory," THEN THE IRAQ WAR CAN BE ENDED: NUCLEAR WEAPONS CAN BE USED AGAINST EVEN THE INSURGENTS THAT ARE THERE AND FINISH THE JOB. THOSE NUCLEAR WEAPONS WILL THEN BE USED AGAINST THE ENTIRE GLOBAL POPULATION FOR A "NEW" AGE OF TERROR NEVER BEFORE SEEN SINCE THE EXISTENCE OF THIS PLANET!!

12/13/2006
The word is out that President Bush has sent his daughter Jenna to the South American country of Paraguay to buy some at least 100,000 acres of land in Chaco. In the arrangement, at least 500 heavily armed US troops, we are told, already landed there where an agreement has been made that neither they nor the president would be tried for war crimes.

Paraguay is a country very famous for providing safe haven to Nazis after WWII. It is known to be a haven for war criminals. Its official policy is that no one gets extradited even if he is suspected of being a war criminal. Since Bush claimed to be going after global terror and anyone aiding, abetting or harboring any terrorists, is it a miracle that Paraguay escaped his hit list?

Why does Bush want to go there? What attractions would Paraguay have for him that excels over the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave? Why would he want to go there after working so beneficially to provide "Peace" and "Freedom" for America?

Why wouldn't Bush desire to clear his name and image instead of trying to avoid trial?

Why would Bush be fearful of a fair trial after putting on paper that he doesn't have to give anybody else fair trials in America?

12/08/2006 Poster wrote:
I'm talking about the Saddam they claimed is the cause of the Iraq War. After setting up America after their Inquisitions with the premise that the Patriot Act is needed to arrest, detain and torture anyone without charge, something very strange happened!

The Nazicons [here meaning those called Conservatives] brought their principles from Nazi Germany of unlawful incarceration without charge or due process, and then added the necessity of TORTURE to, according to them, deal with a problem that wasn't a problem till Bush came along.

[They claimed that if they had a choice to torture an Iraqi or an insurgent so that he can give up all information that he knows, that will be assumed to be in order to protect innocent life, they would rather do that than be nice and consider "individual rights." It was reported many months ago that at least 89 people were tortured to death without surrendering any of that so-called information the murderers thought that they had.]

Did they really believe these Nazi principles will protect a nation? If you think they were on the level, just think of one person who should have suffered all these things, but they didn't realize they were supposed to give a trial run of their principles on him.

Who is that person?

SADDAM HUSSEIN!

He was not tortured, nor held without charges indefinitely, without lawyers, etc. Remember this is the man of mans in the War on Terror? How could they have forgotten to use their own principles on what they claim is the man of mans who is responsible for the Iraq War?? [They didn't even torture Saddam to find out where he stashed those WMDs just before the war! Obviously they knew he didn't have any!!]

Americans can be embarrassed and humiliated. But Nazis can't!

[Saddam is now dead without ever being tortured into revealing where those elusive WMDs went! Strange people are still posting on the internet that Saddam possessing WMDs "IS A FACT!"]

[These are the same people who tell us that anything apart from the official story of events is called, "Conspiracy theories." The official story is that Saddam didn't have any at the time Bush demanded him to surrender.] This proves they were lying all along. America started a war against Saddam and classed him as the number one terrorist in the world. Why wouldn't they think he would have information that they might need and therefore would need to be detained, tried in secret and tortured? Don't they know that under Bush and on paper all Americans are eligible to be tortured in secret without due process? What is an American compared to Saddam Hussein?]

PRESENT-DAY TERRORISM AN ALMOST EXCLUSIVE DISEASE OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION!

In order to deceive the masses about the new issue of Terrorism that appears unique to the Bush administration, Jesuits stalk the internet in order to tell people that terrorism was always around since even the beginning of this country. When asked about Bush claiming that 911 ushers in "A New Day," they ignore the questions consistently. You and I know that even the word was not popular when grandma was growing up. We challenged them to even merely gage the use of the word on the Google Newsgroup archives established since 1981. All will find that the word was hardly used, but more grew and grew and then exploded with the tenure of President Bush Jr.

Here now the facts about the issue of terrorism and why it is rather unique to the Bush Administration:

America saw terrorism over in the middle east for a long time. This terrorism differed with acts of war in that...

TERRORISTS EVOLVED FROM ATTACKING THE LEADERS THAT ANGER THEM TO ATTACKING THE PEOPLE THE LEADERS GOVERN.

Assassinations took place even in the US. JFK was assassinated. We were hurt by this, but business went on without asking that the Constitution be trashed, as all Nazis and Communists always wanted.

Soon the internal enemies began to teach us that we must surrender our liberties in the event of any crisis. This was taught us over and over again in preparation for the reality. Then a unique president with ties to key Arabs came along and stole two elections with the help of many. This president is different in that he claims to personally talk with God, and he has business dealings and family ties to the Bin Ladens and Saudis AT THE SAME TIME! (God and the Bin Ladens and Saudis??)

Soon, terrorists struggle to ignore the American leaders that upset them and attack the American people. That is the actual concept of terrorism on American soil, now with the "T" word all over our lives, that is unique to Bush. It is different from acts of war. It took place on American soil and was based on the philosophy that the leaders who cause all the problems must be ignored in order to attack their people, then allowing those leaders to claim they must be empowered above every constitutional principle because they failed to protect us.

After failing to protect the American people at 911, Bush acquires prowess and concludes that he must be above every law for failing to protect America. The propaganda Jesuits are sent all over the internet to humiliate the intelligence of the American people.

THEY HAVE SUCCEEDED!

NEW 12/30/2006 (revised)
What would happen if the BIG BAD OL "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS" THAT ARE OUT TA GET YA were in control of the world instead of the conspirators? Difficult to think huh?

1. THERE WOULD BE NO 911!
That's the way it was before when the American forefathers even confessed the existence of the Illuminati and knew there was a global conspiracy. These guys would not even have gotten into the affairs of Arabs period and there would be no Jihads, as there were none when the American forefathers raised this country. They would never teach that in the event of a crisis, the American people must surrender their liberties for security like the Communists and Nazis always held and believed. Neither would they constantly ignore quotations from the American forefathers stating the opposite.

2. THERE WOULD BE NO FOREIGN AID NOR FOREIGN AGENDAS!
They advocated quite strongly that America has nothing to do with the other countries whether by peace missions or most anything else.

3. THERE WOULD BE NO PRIVATE BANK CONTROLLING THE ECONOMY NOR INCOME TAX
Because there would be no foreign agendas, foreign aid, peacekeeping missions, etc. The IRS would not have been raised. There would be no necessity to deplete the wealth of a wealthy nation to share out with others in order to hide up the reason for the marked success of one over the other. But by sharing out our wealth to other countries, we put them in a state of indebtedness and prepare the way for this country and those to be OWNED under the New World Order.

We had all these policies of isolationism while America was growing. Back then it sure looked like America steadily grew stronger and stronger for the worth of it.

4. THERE WOULD BE IMMEDIATE AND LEGITIMATE INVESTIGATION OF THE 911 TRAGEDY!
Independent investigation of 911 would take place RIGHT AWAY NO EXCUSES! Hey, not everybody in the world is stupid! While all the evidence is FRESH, the typical "conspiracy theorist" would have an investigation IMMEDIATELY! Remember, these guys have nothing to hide as opposed to the conspirator. The Bush Administration set up an "Independent" investigation some twelve months or so afterward. That is bad reflexes that no innocent party would ever have. If they can tell us we must accept the Patriot Act so that they can snoop into our private information claiming that to refuse is indication that we have something to hide, why can't the American public rightly assume what all legitimate nations have always assumed since the beginning of time when people engage in cover-up or obstruction of evidence or investigation? In the future, if the government puts you in detention and then starts an investigation on you, if you tamper with evidence in any way, will you expect that the government will see your point if you argue that your interference is no proof you were involved?

A "conspiracy theorist" would not even keep information from black boxes out of the reach of the American people. They will keep the government open.

5. AFTER 911, MEMBERS OF OSAMA'S FAMILY WOULD NOT BE FLOWN OUT OF THE COUNTRY WITHOUT BEING QUESTIONED!
The "conspiracy theorists" are neither conspirators nor stupid!

6. THEY WOULD BE MORE CONCERNED WITH THE ISSUES OR INCONSISTENCIES AS OPPOSED TO THOSE TALKING ABOUT IT!
Under the most dangerous and questionable circumstances, they will not pounce around in paranoia against groups talking about 911 or the mounds of other and growing questionable incidents all around the country in order to tell them to not be paranoid and to consider that everything is ok. To the typical "conspiracy theorist" the dangerous situations are far more of concern than that people are talking about them.

7. IF SOMEONE ISSUES LIES IN ORDER TO START A WAR, HE WOULD BE PUNISHED FOR HIS GRAVE ERROR!
Neither the media nor any other form of public communication will be even be allowed to brush aside the issue of the lives that have been lost under the premise that national security is in danger because the reputation of the person who issued the inaccuracies is at risk! Neither would they allow Condi Rice to warn the world not to "impugn" her "integrity" when being questioned why she drummed up support for war under false information and then had to shed so many tears in public because of her error.

They then will not allow conspirators to post how vile and such an embarrassment Michael Moore is!

The whole issue of Democracy is a lie. What is a Democracy-loving president to do with a staggering admitted at least 12% of the citizens believing he had something to do with 911, and statistics much worse globally? Just ignore them and send more fifth column conspirators to argue and bellow "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS!" day and night, and then escalate government coverups, lies, and then claiming of power over the Constitution?

He is fighting for a One World Government. Therefore the beliefs of the globe are included. A typical "conspiracy theorist" would hold open meetings and referendums to clear up all the issues, NOT make the government more secretive and then escalate more cover-ups and signing off more liberties behind the backs of the American people.

Question: Did 3,000 lives get lost while the established method of protection funded by tax dollars was there? After 3,000 lives were lost, how long did it take to have an independent investigation?

Answer: One to two years!

Question: Would that have happened if a "conspiracy theorist" the conspirators are paranoid about were in office? After Bush failed us and 911 happened, did Bush become weaker in light of his failure? or stronger?

Answer: No, it would not have happened if the "conspiracy theorist" was in power. If a president fails to protect so dramatically, he would have at least been tried under the reason of the big bad 'ol "conspiracy theorists" that are out ta get us! After Bush's failure at 911, he became stronger.

Question: Did he benefit in any way?

Answer: Yes, he received dictator powers above the Constitution of the United States at the very least, and started a war with a nation mentioned as the "Axis of EVIL" which was the weakest of all the nations mentioned, but yet rich in oil.

Question: What are we supposed to know when we reward people who fail us?

Answer: If it is profitable to fail, there will be failure again!

Question: After the 911 failure, how did Bush show that he was sorry?

Answer: He showed pictures of the 911 disaster for his re-election campaign and even more than hinted that if Kerry were elected for the presidency, another terror attack could take place!

Question: Where did he get even those possible statistics?

Answer: It certainly wasn't from records of the tenures of any other president of the United States! Although Muslim extremists and airplanes were around all our lives, with other forms of terrorism, no presidential administration failed to protect us.

NEXT PART!