MORE SUPPORT FOR THE MOTION THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
Jesuit "Don"

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.theory/browse_thread/thread/918795eb66d2f52b/8bc82e5167314786#8bc82e5167314786

alk.politics.theory > #DESPERATE JESUIT TRIES TO MAKE EXCUSES FOR 911 TRAGEDY GETTING IN!!
Susan Williams   Oct 7 2004, 10:33 am     show options
Newsgroups: talk.politics.theory, talk.politics.misc, talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.libertarian
From: Susan Williams <SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.com> - Find messages by this author
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:33:17 -0500
Local: Thurs, Oct 7 2004 10:33 am
Subject: Re: #DESPERATE JESUIT TRIES TO MAKE EXCUSES FOR 911 TRAGEDY GETTING IN!!
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | View Thread | Show original | Report Abuse

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:04:43 +0100, "Don" <d...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.c­om> wrote in message
>news:c3e5m0p396jabge8ecrgm1vipgmo0priph@4ax.com...
>> ...  (snipped)  ...

Don:
>(A load of anti-catholic bigotted nonsense)

IN DEFENSE OF 'THE CHURCH' WIPING OUT HER NEIGHBOURS...

This was a post Susan Williams made in response to a post written by Joseph Geloso entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH WIPING OUT HERETICS."  That post reasoned that Rome had the right to exterminate all who do not strictly accept her teachings.  Even well before that post, the jobs of the Jesuits described accurately by the writers of the Protestant Reformation and Jack Chick was to continuously rant day and night that those who SAY THE EXACT SAME THINGS ABOUT ROME, were "hateful" and "bigoted ANTI-CATHOLICS!"

Susan responded with the title above, "IN DEFENSE OF 'THE CHURCH' WIPING OUT HER NEIGHBOURS" to show the Parable of the Good Samaritan.  Joseph Geloso took us back to the Old Testament telling us that even Deuteronomy says that ROME TODAY must kill those who do not believe her teachings.

We looked for that post all over the Google Newsgroup archives, but couldn't find it.  We at least found the following sub-post that gives an idea of what we posted...

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic/msg/d470eb639664eb1e

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 04:38:09 -0500, Joseph Geloso <josep...@hotmail.com> wrote: >On 14 Nov 2003 20:49:49 GMT, Susan Williams ><salethie...@rocketmail.com> wrote: ><snip>

Joseph Geloso:
>Susan, we are done. I apologize for upsetting you with the Biblical
>defense of the Church's claim to have temporal power. I knew it would
>upset you, and that was wrong of me. So please accept my apology.
>I am tired of being called antichrist by you. That is not who I am. I
>love Christ, my Lord and my God. I pray that He may enlighten you and
>bring you into the fulness of His Church. Amen!

BUT YOU ARE ANTICHRIST!  You know about Homeland Security and you tell us that Rome has the right to exterminate all non-Catholics.  In the mean and interim you join those who libel us for hatred because we expose this! You are lying.  

You are misrepresenting.  If you think this is not true, gain the sense for once to answer fairly the question we have been asking.  Since you set up a thread telling us you must defend Rome's right to wipe out heretics a.k.a all other religions and religionists, answer the following easy question: WHO IS YOUR NEIGHBOUR!!!

Luke 10:25  And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 26  He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? 27  And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. 28  And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. 29  But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour? 30  And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. 31  And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32  And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. 33  But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, 34  And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. 35  And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee. 36  Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves? 37  And he said, He that showed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.

In His Grace,

Susan

The entire long dialogue with these particular Jesuits can be found on this link:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic/browse_thread/thread/78ce2611ab08008b/ac3653195e25efe0

This is a very long dialogue containing many pages showing the Jesuits constantly and repetitively lying and making light of death threats against billions of people neither Ted Bundy or Charles Manson could have possibly made.  Obeying the Jesuit Oath, as often as they complained about us exposing those bold death threats that prove Rome is still exactly the same as during the Inquisitions, notice here, as everywhere else, they can't afford to leave our posts, but desperately trail them to even heckle them out.

You can witness much more of the dialogue by clicking on the "Older -- Newer" links found at the top and bottom of the pages.

[He was commenting on Susan's reaction to the posts of Joseph Geloso which claimed that Rome had the right to kill all who do not subscribe to her teachings.  According to him, no one should be offended by that:  (http://www.TheirSecrets.info/AC/AppealChapIb.htm).  He therefore called Susan's irritation and words against this, "anti-catholic bigotted nonsense."  He claimed there that Rome has the right to kill all non-Catholics since it is a matter of faith.  He claimed this was necessary to prevent "faith" from being destroyed, where the result will be damnation.  These were the SAME ARGUMENTS of the Inquisitors of history reported to us in Historic Protestant Documents, and Jack Chick.  It is quite obvious that for Rome to survive, she has to employ her imps to bellow day and night to cover over the evidence that Jack Chick and the spokespersons for the Reformation were right!

Why would Jesuit Don take my expose on his friends posting that all non-Catholics must die, seriously?]

Susan:
THIS SUPER-DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL HEARD AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT OTHER
SUPER-CRIMINALS POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!

What else is the super-terrorist organization going to conclude??

Don:

>Susan, have you nothing better to do, no other project or purpose in life,
>than to spend your hours sulking about a thread you started in November
>2003 - that's eleven months ago, for goodness sake!

[Just because they made statements that dominated the world for centuries, and since that time so many others approached us in order to "properly represent Rome" and attacked us tooth and nail under the accusation of HATRED since?  Why would the super-criminal sulk about people who want to save lives?  Why doesn't he acquire another purpose in life?]

Susan:
THIS DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HIS SUPER-TERRORIST
FRIENDS POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!!

He gave no comment about those terrorists having the same mandates as
centuries ago!!

Don:

>It is quite clear that you don't understand the thread started by Joseph
>Geloso on 4th November 2003. That thread was very controversial and, to
>paraphrase, is asking how far the Church should go in the self-defence of
>its adherents.

[Better yet, we're not hateful and Anti-Catholic just because we object to the worst super-criminals the written principles of Homeland Security can ever condemn!  Isn't it great to know that the strange people everywhere telling us we must understand that people can disagree never believed that from the start?  Can you understand why it is important to them that no one disagree with their idea that there is no conspiracy--especially the one they're involved in?]

Susan:
THIS DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL SHOULD HAVE UNDERSTOOD THE TRUE MEANING OF
ALL THE THREADS WRITTEN BY JACK CHICK UNTIL OTHERS UNCONTROLLABLY HAD
TO CONFIRM HIS WRITINGS AND "SLIP" POST HOW ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST
DIE! 

[Many will then have to slip, while many others slip in not recognizing that, by their own statement, all who embarrass Rome are horribly evil and must be opposed.]

Geloso said that the church has the right to wipe out heretics and
then said, "SO WHAT!"  We have the right just to report about that,
and these demons pull out their hairs and call us "hate personified!"

Don:

>You should have noticed that the original was a question not
>an assertion. The concensus rightly did not agree with Geloso. Geloso's
>question encapsulates a view which is utterly unacceptable by any right
>thinking person. However, as is common with newsgroup threads, a number of
>persons, usually from the standpoint of ignorance over-reacted to the
>initial line of argument. Some promulgated the lie that the Catholic church
>supports the wiping out of non-Catholics.

Susan:
THIS UTTERLY DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL AND SUPER-TERRORIST ACNOWLEDGED
THAT SEEBER FOLLOWED IN THE LINE OF THOUGHT AND POSTED THAT ALL
NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE.  TERESITA FOLLOWED AND THEN STATED, "IT'S
NOTHING PERSONAL.  IT'S JUST BUSINESS" TO EXTERMINATE THEM.

SHAN CAME IN HOFFING IN ANGER AT US EXPOSING SEEBER TO CLAIM SEEBER
DOESN'T REPRESENT ROME.  SHAN THENCE SAID THAT ALL ADVENTISTS,
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, "MORONS" (MORMONS) AND OTHERS "MUST DIE!"

HE THEN WROTE BREATHELESSLY HOW ALL SUCH SHOULD BE "BURNED" BECAUSE
THEY ARE DAMNED ANYWAY!

[Don knows all of this.  He is a super-criminal jesuit.  These messages are not for him!  They are an endeavor to warn YOU!]

Don:

>Most of those who did this were
>clearly opposed to Catholicism. They clearly have an agenda which is to
>paint the Church in the blackest colours they can invent. The reality is
>that it is not the policy of the Catholic church to wipe out non-believers.

[The reality is that we do not hate all Catholics just because we're upset with some of them posting that all non-Catholics must die.  Then, if we see certain Catholics behaving as the Reformation and Jack Chick has documented, like Jesuit Don here, we will understand that he is a Jesuit just the same as throughout the centuries.

Since he claims that people like Seeber will want to paint Catholicism in the blackest colors, will he be upset with them?  Who will be upset with them for embarrassing Rome?  This is another breathless lie!  Seeber, Teresita, Shan, and the others are permanent supporters and servants of the Vatican.  Some, if not all of them have been posting their support for the Vatican for years.  If what Jesuit Don said was true, that they are struggling to defame Rome, how is it Don himself is, like them, accusing me of the same crime and being upset with me?  Their foremost claim was that I did not properly represent Rome.  Here again Jesuit Don claims that Seeber and the others do not, but he is not upset with them for committing the same crime he is cursing me for.]

Susan:
SHOWN BY THIS SUPER-CRIMIINAL FOLLOWING THAT LONG LINE OF OTHER
SUPER-CRIMINALS TO ONLY ATTACK THOSE REPORTING ABOUT THE STEADY AND
VOLUNTARY CONFIRMATION OF THE WRITINGS OF JACK CHICK!

A SUPER-TERRORIST IS A SUPER-TERRORIST.  THE ONES WHO DID THIS REMAIN
UNCHALLENGED AND UNREMARKED. THE ONES WHO REPORTED ABOUT IT ARE
ATTACKED.  THIS SUPER-CRIMINAL SHOULD THENCE FURTHER HAVE NO POWER TO
RESIST THE WORDS OF JACK CHICK, AND MUST BE A PSYCHIATRIST ALSO!

Don:

>Nor would anyone of sound mind seriously suggest that the Catholic church
>was behind 911. You have responded to both lies by adopting them and sulking
>about them for eleven months. Is that not insane?

Susan:
IMAGINE ME BEING UPSET ABOUT PEOPLE BOLDLY POSTING THAT ALL
NON-CATHOLIC MUST DIE, INSTEAD OF AGREEING WITH THE MOTION AS THIS
DAMNED SUPER-DECEIVER!

BUT THEY ALL OPPOSED ABORTION!!  SURELY THIS WILL NOT CATCH THE EYE OF
THE SUPER-CRIMINAL PSYCHIATRIST!

Don:

>It quite beggars belief that you, having taken these comments literally (do
>you believe everything you read in Newsgroups?),

[Why then is Jesuit Don attacking me, instead of saying to himself that he just can't believe someone would be upset at others posting extermination of all not of their religion after 911?  Does he really believe a person should be upset at mandates of death against his own life, those of his family, friends and fellow Christians?]

Susan:
Why is this super-criminal believing what I write since he is
irritated at the reporting of the actions of the super-criminals
instead of the other way around?

Don:
>should not have been
>satisfied with venting your frustrations in your own little thread.

Susan:
This damned Jesuit should have been satisfied giving his psychiatric
diagnosis of me and thence giving him excuse to ignore insane posts!

Don:
>You have
>had your opportunity to mouth off at Geloso even though you started your
>thread with bigotry calling it "In defense of wiping our our neighbours"

[So Geloso was misunderstood, but the super-criminal is accusing me and faulting me for making another thread to counteract Geloso's thread!  That thread entitled, "In Defense of The Church Wiping Out Her Neighbors" was written in honor of the lesson Christ gave in the Parable of the Good Samaritan showing us how we must treat those of other faiths.  Jesuit Don called it "bigotry."  In order for Rome to return to her crimes HER AGENTS HAVE TO ACCUSE THOSE EXPOSING HER OF THE VATICAN'S VERY ATTRIBUTES.  In this case Don condemns Christ by calling the lesson given in honor of His very teachings, "BIGOTRY."  Child's play for the agents of the Vatican as documented.] 

Susan:
That's the difference between Christians and Antichristians.  Me
appealing to Christ's methods and treating with respect and kindness
those not of our faiths will be looked upon as bigotry by the sons and
daughters of perdition.

NOTICE THIS DAMNED INQUISITOR WENT BACK A LONG TIME AGO TO SULK ABOUT
MY PLEA TO RESPECT HUMAN LIFE?

Don:

>and opening with the factually incorrect sentence "Below is one of the posts
>written by super-terrorists who tell us it
>is legitimate to wipe out all non-Catholics." The reality is that those who
>started the original thread did not tell you that.

Susan:
The reality is that they told us that.  That's why other
super-criminal psychiatrists cannot remove themselves from what they
call insane posts!

Don:
>You inferred it
>incorrectly by not looking at the purpose of the original thread.

Susan:
No wonder I'm upset about people posting how all non-Catholics must
die, and, as Jack Chick documents, super-criminals will always only be
upset with those who report about it.

Don:
>Not content with this, you have mouthed off and defamed every one who has
>contributed to the present discussion.

Susan:
I HAVE COMPLIMENTED ALL THE SUPER-CRIMINALS HERE WHO WILL NATURALLY
OVERLOOK SOMEONE POSTING HOW ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE SINCE THEY
AGREE WITH THIS AS DON, BUT THEN BECOME UPSET AT THOSE REPORTING ABOUT
IT.

Don:
>In doing so you have displayed an astonishingly high level of ignorance,
>intolerance and emotional and religious insecurity.

Susan:
I'M A CRIMINAL!!  BETTER I HAD POSTED THAT ALL CATHOLICS MUST DIE!

THESE ARE THE INQUISITORS AND SUPER-TERRORISTS SUPER-CRIMINALS OF THE
AGES!


Don:
>You have also mouthed off against Opus Dei and the Jesuits (of which, once
>again I stress, I am not one)

Susan:
DAMNED DAMNED DAMNED LIAR!  Characteristics are all there!

Don:
>both instituions in relation to which the
>criticisms you raise are misdirected.

Susan:
In this Jesuit's opinion.  After those attacks the form of government
being established and changed is mimicking the Inquisitions as people
even tell us we must pre-emptively attack other nations and people and
use TORTURE to save the formerly Jesuit non-PARANOIC world.

Don:
>There are other criticisms which might
>have been directed towards them, but involvement in 911 is not one.

Susan:
NEW WORLD ORDER!  Bush family.  Nazis and ties to them.  Vatican:
globalist organization.  Nazis globalists.  Communists globalists.

Super-terrorist married to my posts.  Constantly asked why every
super-criminal has to call my posts insane, but they can't afford to
[but] struggle to smother and heckle them out.  People who need hearing aids
and psychiatrists always know reality?


Don:
>Is it not time to bow out gracefully?

Susan:
THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO TELL THE DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL!  Leave those
who are exposing the super-criminals for the sake of human life and
ignore my posts!  He is giving common sense, is he not?  Can he keep
it?

Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging
around our posts.

People posted that all non-Catholics must die.  We were uspet about
it.  Suddenly, as told us by Jack Chick, we have strange people from
different denominations attacking us ONLY and for years have refused
to say one bad word against those who did this.

Lest you forget the issue or evidence, here it is...

<<snip main documentation of the death mandates>>

 

[Here now they begin to portray those who love life and would defend the rights of their brothers to live as "HATEFUL!"]

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.theory/msg/481af2d93334cb0b
On 7 Oct 2004 21:28:53 -0700, starblaz...@hotmail.com (Kenna) wrote:
 

>"THIS SUPER-DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL HEARD AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT OTHER
>SUPER-CRIMINALS POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!" - Susan
>Williams...

>Susan, where is the love?

It went to BILLIONS of people who were condemned by super-terrorists!
Where is the love in your Vatican?

>Why do you hate them so much, and don't say because "they said that
>all Non-Catholics must die"

>Man this is fun!
 

Why do you believe all non-Catholics must die?

Why do you hate BILLIONS of people because they are non-Catholic and
insist that love demands I make the billions victims to the fewer
super-terrorists like you?

What should we do with Osama?

When Bush flew planes to Afghanistan, did you conjure up that
question?
 

In His Grace,
 

Susan
 

[Here now Don works to make people believe that the death mandates against all non-Catholics were posted by me...]

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/talk.politics.theory/msg/06a851780c38cc90
Susan Williams   Oct 20 2004, 7:50 am     show options

Newsgroups: talk.politics.theory, talk.politics.misc, talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.libertarian
From: Susan Williams <SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.com> - Find messages by this author
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:50:14 -0500
Local: Wed, Oct 20 2004 7:50 am
Subject: Re: #DESPERATE JESUIT TRIES TO MAKE EXCUSES FOR 911 TRAGEDY GETTING IN!!
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | View Thread | Show original | Report Abuse

On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:57:37 +0100, "Don" <d...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.c­om> wrote in message
>news:r89om0p8mdqg8aaivjg6gegopa15v7teep@4ax.com...
>> He's upset about abortion?

Don:
>Who mentioned abortion?

>Have you realised, Susan, that you bear the greatest responsibility for
>repeating, repeating, repeating the assertion that "all non-Catholics must
>die."

[Do you see what the figment of Jack Chick's imagination is doing here???]

Susan:
I'LL KEEP SOUNDING IT TO THE HOUSETOPS TILL THOSE WHO MAKE SUCH
STATEMENTS RECEIVE JUSTICE!

Thus far, your reaction is to ask me where is my love.


Don:
>Maybe that is the way you want to be remembered?

>regards
>Don

[Don continues to impress upon all that I issued the death mandates he supports.  He then begins to look at the situation as serious ONLY AFTER HE BEGINS TO INFER THAT I MADE THOSE STATEMENTS!...]

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/talk.politics.theory/msg/5d3c4c559d153fa2

Susan Williams   Oct 21 2004, 12:07 am     show options
Newsgroups: talk.politics.theory, talk.politics.misc, talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.libertarian
From: Susan Williams <SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.com> - Find messages by this author
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:07:31 -0500
Local: Thurs, Oct 21 2004 12:07 am
Subject: Re: #DESPERATE JESUIT TRIES TO MAKE EXCUSES FOR 911 TRAGEDY GETTING IN!!
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | View Thread | Show original | Report Abuse

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:06:37 +0100, "Don" <d...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.c­om> wrote in message
>news:4nucn0lmrn3p9ksp8gqpovmpiuumtglgeq@4ax.com...

Don:
>> >Have you realised, Susan, that you bear the greatest responsibility for
>> >repeating, repeating, repeating the assertion that "all non-Catholics
>must
>> >die."

Susan:
>> I'LL KEEP SOUNDING IT TO THE HOUSETOPS TILL THOSE WHO MAKE SUCH
>> STATEMENTS RECEIVE JUSTICE!

Don:
>But why, Susan, do you keep saying that all non-Catholics must die?

[He seemed to have forgotten his own teaching that all men die anyway!  He's now forgetting that no one should worry then about [according to him, now "Susan"...] posting that all non-Catholics must die, because Rome doesn't teach that!  Why then would he be worried about anyone saying that after he told us already it doesn't matter if a Vatican super-criminal says that, since he claims all men die?  You will soon see the depths to which they go with these absurdities they are saying.  Hopefully your eyes will be opened to understand that the same super-criminals are commanding politics today!]

Susan:
Below are your friends posting it.  You know I'm upset about it and
you delight in it.  Yet you're a damned Vatican psychiatrist who know
everyone who loves life is wacko!

Remember you judged me as insane as all the other abandoned killers of
the Antichrist.  Why ask me questions as if I'm sane?

BELOW ARE THE WORDS OF YOUR SUPER-CRIMINAL FRIENDS TELLING US ALL
NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE THAT MAKES YOU ATTACK US FOR REPORTING IT AND
BEING UPSET ABOUT IT!


Don:
>Do you not see how hurtful this comment is to us?

>regards
>Don

Susan:
KILLERS SHOULD HURT!  GOD WILL PUT A HURTIN' ON YOU!


END

INTRODUCING: "DROPCLOTH" THE HYPOCRITE JESUIT!

 

 

HOME