No suspension of
the Constitution is ever necessary for any form of real security. That
is the real myth, and not the reality that there is a global conspiracy.
That's why treason can see people
believing in their conspiracy, but frequently dance over statements made
by the American forefathers which say in essence, "He who would agree to
surrender a measure of his liberties for security, deserves neither
liberty nor security." That's because he's too plain stupid.
To ever justify a suspension of the
Constitution for any reason, justifies being like our proverbial
enemies, the Communists and Nazis. There is never a time such a
condition will be necessary, just like Bush's vacationing is just one
proof the Patriot Act he claims is "vital" is not necessary.
Remember that we caught Saddam Hussein
and had him in our hands. It was there proven how the Patriot Act and
torture are not necessary. Bush forgot to use them against Saddam to
even reveal where he shipped his elusive WMDs to.
BrandonKnight (Traitorous Soldier):
You know with all of what you say, you'll be one of the first to get
carted off in the middle of the night. Are you sure this is treason. Are
you sure you should be speaking out loud about things you have no real
knowledge about?
I hope you are ready for
the storm that
is coming, when people like me have to rid America of all of it's
domestic enemies. Treason, treason, treason. Some of us are ready to see
our country into the future with out any one to hinder the process....
I will leave the corpses of those that do
not comply in the open to decay. I hope you have a lo of ammo, I know
the military does, and has the ability to take all of the commercial/shlef
bought lot when the word comes.
Tmac1238:
Ah excuse me!!! You guys said, let's make war
in Iraq, let's order our security principles like the Communists AND
THEN WE'LL MAINTAIN OUR FREEDOMS! How then can you suggest that even I,
freely disagreeing can get carted off into the night? Are you giving
something away?
How could I get harmed
or carted off to anywhere when our Bad Boys are dying to preserve our
freedoms even to disagree? If anyone can still be carted off anyway, who
even votes against George Bush, why are our Bad Boys dying? Often
you guys give yourselves away!
BrandonKnight:
Damn, you got
me again. You're too good.
You should face it, our government, to
include the President, George W. Bush, is the best thing since sliced
bread. They are working every day and night to make sure that you are
safe and sound when you lay your little, or big head down to go to
sleep.
[We asked all the propagandists to
show us their posts in concern for terror before Bush came and they
still can't understand the most simple of questions. That is because,
like their ancestors in the Inquisitions, the Communist Regimes and the
Nazi regime, they keep spending too much time mentally diagnosing
humans.]
If it wasn't for our awesome president,
we would have been over run by Al'Qaida some time ago. They have
put in place the best of measures EVER, to insure that there is not a
chance that these guys can get to us.
Thank goodness for the Patriot Act. I
feel safer everyday that I wake up. I have no reason to doubt our
great leader, Emperor, oops, President Bush. I am ready to take action
against those that are not good citizens, and lawful Republicans.
Tmac1238:
Awww man! How long
was Al Qaedda around? How did we survive all these years when you were
in anxiety clinics for terror till Bush came? Constitutional and sane
human beings were not in anxiety clincis for terror till Bush came in
2001! Now humans are going into anxiety clinics for terror after Bush
came. Monsters are coming out when Bush came because they can't stand
Constitutional liberty.
Can you please explain--I mean dodge
around this--again? Did you ask Batman and Robin how they coped
against terrorism in Gotham City? How did Bert and Ernie of Sesame
street survive this long with Al Qaedda around? Where did you guys
get all this propaganda nonsense? You attended Osama's thanksgiving
dinner party last year?
When was it suddenly accepted that
Communist and Nazi security principle in the Patriot Act became the best
measures ever for security, and why do you fail to plainly and audibly
give them credit for being lightbearers in security? When did you figure
out that the measures the Communists and Nazis took for security were
the best measures and best form of government ever?
NEW!! IQ TESTERS!
Updated
11/4/2008
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/iqexhibits.htm
This first of two pages gives major tests of the intelligence of
the American people and the rest of the global population as it relates
to the political revolutions that are taking place all around them! The scriptures tell us that just before Jesus comes the global
population will suffer a serious intelligence problem. Let's see
if that is true!
NEW!!
THE CHURCH IS ONE! How is it and why is it that Jesus Christ
Himself couldn't understand that THE CHURCH IS ONE??
The only country we know of that
has not visited this website is...
North Korea!
Every known even Arab and Muslim country has
visited!
YOUR EYES ARE CLOSED. YOU
HAVE BEEN HIT IN THE EYES FOR SO MANY YEARS, IT'S DIFFICULT FOR THEM TO OPEN!
BETTER OPEN THEM QUICKLY!
It's all gonna cost ya!
The 150 questions on page were taken from the
IQ
Testers page!
The ones who gave you the
workover, are not the ones you perceive as your enemies, but the ones you think
are your friends who work in both church and state!
We therefore start with
the most unique
exercises in order to open those battered and black and blue portals.
Starting with...
THE REAL QUESTIONS
THE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS
THE UNANSWERED QUESTIONS, just
below here...
Now 150 Questions That Save Lives! New
questions in blue.
11/4/2008
By Susan Williams
1. Why are the Bush
propagandists making such a big deal at the last minute that Obama is a terrorist and based this concern on the idea that he
had some form of ties to Bill Ayers? They want to protect the
nation from terrorism?? DO YOU KNOW THAT BILL AYERS IS
RESPECTABLY TEACHING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS RIGHT NOW?
Do you know that he holds the Distinguished Professor of
Education and Senior University Scholar awards? Why didn't the
Bush propagandists go get him yet and save us??
2. Why did it take till the last months of the Bush reign to know that the
Democrats are the cause for the current financial crisis after starting
"pre-emptive" wars claiming we must corner off tragedies before they occur?
Was it because all that time we were being saved from "Conspiracy
theorists," no-fly-zones and defeated dictators?
3. If government leaders manage to
create laws that would give them the powers of dictators if a terrible
emergency or crisis comes, why is it only the "conspiracy theorists" will
know crises will definitely come despite their heroic efforts to stop them?
Why would only they know that if these government leaders cannot preemptively
stop these crises before they arrive, they moreso would not be able to get
America out of them after they come and Martial Law is installed?
Isn't it a shame Joe
Plumber attacked Obama in concern his taxes might be raised but is
happy with having 1.5 trillion dollars war against no-fly-zones,
700 billion dollars going to bailouts, and the effects of raised
taxes for years at the gas pumps under Bush policy?
4. General Patraeus and his
supporters are incensed that people would call him General "Betrayus"
claiming he's a traitor to America. Can we find out if this is true if
his very kids know that the wars now staged for "democracy" have been voted
down by the American people and they still continue? Was the American
vote these wars being staged to protect in "democracy" betrayed?
5. Bush said in May 2008:
"Popularity is fleeting. Principles are forever." How long then
will it take even Harvard, Yale, Georgetown and Princeton to understand that
wars for "Global Democracy"...
are lies?
6.
Why would Bush finally flip-flop and tell us the Iraq War situation is
similar to what happened in Vietnam and we therefore can't pull out?
Did we have to attack the Vietcong and start the Vietnam war because they
were already defeated and were in no-fly-zones like Saddam was?
Where wars "for global democracy" can be
voted down by the people and be globally unpopular, but will still
continue anyway. Ever heard of an "unpopular democracy?"
7. Since war-mongers also told us before the Vietnam
war, that we had to fight the enemy there or fight them here, and that we
have to fight that war in order to "defend our freedoms" just like today,
how did we cope with enemies here in our land and tyranny all these years after we lost that war
and pulled out?
8. If we pulled out of Iraq now, is
it true terrorists would use Iraq, half way around the world, to attack us
here, instead of some alternative place closer?
You mean this was proven by terrorists using oil-rich Iran to attack us from
there?
In other
words, if there is so much free space over in Iraq
where terrorists can attack us, why are they
ignoring that free space to attack America's
military in Iraq?
Does anyone understand that oil-rich Iran is
almost 4 times larger than Iraq?? You mean we were terrorized by Iran
all these years and didn't know it??
They're saying that if we pulled out
of Iraq even before, it would be taken over by terrorists and become an
oil-rich terrorist nation like Iran. IT WOULD THEN ATTACK US LIKE IRAN
ALWAYS HAS BEEN!
9. Is there something about the accusation of
treason or sedition that the 2006 elections cannot solve? [Bush
propagandists shout out freely that all who oppose Bush are in treason or
sedition. America opposed Bush in the 2006 elections.]
10. Will the seriousness of the current terrorism
situation, which they tell us demands the reinterpretation of the
Constitution to what it had always opposed, convince President Bush that he
shouldn't be the number one vacationing president in American history?
[Obviously he knows the situation is at least well under his control.]
11. Besides hearing a deafening roar of laughter more
thunderous than all our nuclear devices exploding at once, why won't Bush
and his propagandists urge Russia, with her pristine military, to defend her
new-found freedoms in Iraq?
12. Russia - The United States!
One of these nations is stupid and the other isn't. One of these
nations would defend her freedoms in Iraq and the other wouldn't. Is
the one who would defend her freedoms in Iraq stupid or not?
13. Why would President Bush know
that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are in the best interest of the United
States and freedom and liberty? Why then would Communist China also
know those wars are in the best interest of America and would be willing
literally put themselves out to
fund it to the tune presently of 1.5 trillion dollars? When did
Communist China SUDDENLY have America's best interests at heart? Was
it when President Bush SUDDENLY had its best interests at heart?
14. None of the Communist countries
are STUPID enough to fight for freedom in Iraq. WHY WOULD THEY BE
STUPID ENOUGH TO FUND BUSH'S WARS FOR "FREEDOM" TO THE TUNE OF 1.5 TRILLION
DOLLARS WHEN FREEDOM OPPOSES THEIR REGIME CONCEPTS? Could it be they
know
15.
People keep assuming that President Bush is not
very bright. If that is so, why did he have the intelligence to know
that wars to destroy America and freedom requiring one and a half trillion
in funding cannot be financed by free countries?
16. How come terrorists are not
thinking of attacking Russia? If they hate us because we're free, why
wouldn't they hate Russia even more? Note: All tyrannical
regimes and people would more hate and oppose their own members who betray
their cause against freedom over those who were always already free.
Consider also that Russia never directly involved herself in the quarrels
between Arab and Jew like the United States did outside of the directives of
the Constitution.
17. I arm you with guns just in case
the federal government of the United States becomes tyrannical and
dangerous. You reply: "You have lost it man! You're a conspiracy
theorist! You're a terrorist! Here, let me get you some help!"
I then make a proposition: Instead of that, I write a Second Amendment
to the Constitution of the United States to arm you with guns just in case
the federal government of the United States becomes tyrannical and
dangerous. You reply, "That's better! I see you're finally
coming round!"
MESSAGE: The American
forefathers were, "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS!" They knew there was a global
conspiracy. That's why they created the Second Amendment and made the
United States an "ISOLATIONIST" country.
18. If we can't afford the inexperience of Obama
being president, just what was it we were "enjoying" all these 8 years
America?
Sitting idly by while 3 planes struck down
buildings in the United States.
Claiming dictator powers not because he stopped
3 planes from destroying lives, but because he didn't stop them, unlike
every other president that protected us and didn't claim such rewards.
Attacking an already defeated dictator looking
for invisible WMDs that were not there without a blush.
Allowing the person responsible for 911 to still
remain free.
Spending 6yrs trying to defeat the already
defeated dictator.
Destroying the American treasury profiteering
off of the wars against the defeated dictator.
Wasting the lives of generations of innocents in
a false war.
Having no solid protection for our troops in the
wars and wasting much precious time after being told about that fact.
Instituting security principles the Communists
and Nazis always used and calling it "The Patriot Act."
Causing supply, demand, developing China,
developing India and offshore drilling restrictions to FINALLY cause
fuel prices to leap to record highs and then quadruple yet more.
Forcing America now on the brink of recession.
Many more such exploits by the Bush
Administration...
Question: Since it is said
that Barrack Obama doesn't have any experience to be
president, how much experience would anyone need to
emulate the accomplishments of President Bush?
Doesn't it make you personally sad that you would never
have the presidential experience of President Bush??
What about Adolf Hitler? Are you sorry you don't
have the guts to "never back down" like Bush? What
about Fidel Castro? Karl Marx?
The expression they use that
they are to never "waver" or "back down" is a subliminal
mental reservation
message to
each other and for the future, stating in effect that
even the clearly seen benefits of prosperity and wisdom
in liberty and freedom, in contrast to their favored
regimes of Communism and Nazism going back even to the
Inquisitions will not deter them from doing whatever is
possible to break it down and restoring the
Inquisitions. In all elections we saw with the
Bush family, they kept using the message that they never
"back down" or "waffle" as their major virtue.
That was also the major and only "virtue" seen in the
most brutal of dictators.
19. Bush propagandists are
scaring a sector of the Christian world by making it
look like Obama is fulfilling prophetic scripture by
playing the role of saving America and the world from an
imminent crisis. Why would they forget that Bush
claimed that same role after 911 (saying that he will
destroy all evil and that whosoever is "not with us, is
with the terrorists") and even directly claims that God
talks to him personally? If Obama is the
Antichrist by coming to save the United States and
global economy, why would it wind up being him saving
America from the reign of GW Bush?
20. Why wouldn't John McCain,
presumed to be a war hero who was tortured in battle on
behalf of the United States, not recognize the
principles of the Patriot Act, allowing secret trials,
detainment without evidence and torture, for what it is?
Don't be an IDIOT! No matter what, or no
matter what the hatred or anger, no Middle
Eastern Muslim extremist or all of them together
will ever get the power to put you here.
ONLY the most powerful government in the world
can put you here. It may well make its
borders loose also and illegal aliens may be the
best candidates to run these things.
21. Which is the only
president in American history who constantly tells the
American people they are going to be attacked by
Middle-Eastern Muslim terrorists, even after horrible
security expenses like never before?
We already made an unspeakable sacrifice for security we
never made before since Bush! Why does he keep
telling us that notwithstanding, we will still be
attacked by terrorists?
22. If we are still going to be
attacked notwithstanding the American people
surrendering their liberties and the huge expense of
war, why not be given back their liberties, stop the war
and be attacked anyway?
23. Which person ever
said in amazement, "You know, it's been six full years
since our last terror attack!" before Bush became
president? Shouldn't even Nostramorock have told
Fred Flintstone that an advancing age would come where
there would be no terror attacks for six years?
Why couldn't Abbott tell Costello about this? What
about Ricky Ricardo mentioning this to Lucy?
Batman could have made reference of this to Robin?
24. What didn't
our grandmothers tell us about their terrible struggle
and plight against terrorism before Bush? (All
conditions being equal: i.e. Middle Eastern Muslim men
were always around while we were yet free, etc.)
When did they approach and cry to you about the USS
Cole, WTC bombings, etc?
25.
Why doesn't anyone know or remark about the fact
that the Communists and Nazis already had secret
trials, government snooping, "detainment" camps and
torture for their security principles and that we're
actually following them instead of teaching them the
blessings of freedom? Which then would honor
them more: to stage a grand party in their honor
with swastika and sickle flags flying everywhere? or
institute the Patriot Act?
26. If
the Communists and Nazis always had a propaganda team
with the secret courts, secret trials, government
snooping, concentration camps and torture they always
had, would you be shocked if we had an actual vast
propaganda team even all over the internet as we copy
all the other security features the Communists and Nazis
always had?
27.
Why is it Bush propagandists on forums are telling us
that they now feel safer since Bush brought the Patriot
Act and is handling the terrorism situation for us, as
if they were in anxiety clinics for the entire history
of America till Bush came and transformed our security
principles and let them out? Why is all America
telling us the opposite: that they were basically safe
all throughout the history of America, enjoying baseball
and apple pie, till Bush came and made some of them now
have to attend anxiety clinics to deal with the new
problem? If we more
and more adopt the principles the Third Reich and
Communism always had, wouldn't communists and Nazis
among us feel safer to live here?
28. Why do strange people tell
us that the Patriot Act is a NEW set of laws that are
vital, knowing that this country existed with its entire
history without it except for when Bush and vast team
came along? Why did the Patriot Act only become so
vital during Bush's presidency?
WATERBOARDING!
The
men in the picture here are staging
demonstrations to PROVE the OLD technique used
by the fascist regimes and the Inquisitions
called waterboarding is torture. Why they
ever have to do this in a country called
America, is UNPRECEDENTED!
Mommy, is this torture?
"Presidential experience told us it is not, son!
I may use it on you when you hide information
from me. Better than giving you the rod
and be reported as a child-abuser!"
29. Why did America wait through
the entire lives of Lenin, Stalin, Engels, Hitler and
even Castro and never ventured to ask them whether or
not the technique of waterboarding is torture?
Shouldn't they consider that if they asked these brutal
dictators that question, they wouldn't be confused
today?
30. Why do the strange people
refuse to inform us that the principles of the Patriot
Act came right out of the Inquisitions of the Middle
Ages, and that they were also practiced for the entire
history of the Communists and Nazis? [They were
virtually never used for any time during the existence
of America, but those principles for "security" were
used every day in the history of the most brutal regimes
who were the worst enemies to America].
31. If vital information that
can save lives is so necessary America can now FOLLOW
behind the Communists and Nazis to torture to get it,
what good is it when those who claim they must torture
for it, can't assimilate the vital information THAT
SADDAM DIDN'T CAUSE 911, BUT OSAMA DID?
32. Why did Bush
choose to adopt principles of security from the
Inquisitions, the Communists and the Nazis in the
package of the Patriot Act in order to secure “peace”
and “freedom?” Was it because the Inquisitions,
Russia, Red China and the Third Reich already acquired
“peace” and “freedom?”
33. Why after the Patriot Act
was instituted to snoop the American people and true
Americans didn't like it, did strange people dare to ask
them if they have something to hide?
34. Why then, after Bush refused
to testify alone and under oath in an "independent
investigation" of the most major internal tragedy to
take place against the United States at least a year
after the fact, did they not pose the question to Bush
of whether or not he had anything to hide? [We
remind them to ask him even now, and they pretend we are
not asking them anything!]
35. Why do such people chide us,
asking us, "Do you see soldiers breaking down your
doors!" out of our concern against this old proposal,
The Patriot Act, but then staged all kinds of political
campaigns telling us that other countries must be
preemptively attacked before they commit crimes, showing
an abiding concept? Why did they commit even this
election fraud? They said we must not wait neither
for crimes nor tragedies to
take place as an abiding principle.
36. If I claim I am an illegal
alien, would I then become undocumented and be exempt
from the Patriot Act the American citizens are
unfortunate enough to be under? Does something
sound wrong with struggling to snoop and document
everything about the American people while struggling to
make the "undocumented" come here from Mexico or
anywhere else?
37. Why after 911, President
Bush didn't say, "Because of this attack against our
great nation we have to construct devices to snoop for
terrorists among the American people?" Why were
these devices already constructed?
But not watching your borders!
Would you need such "experience" to be
president?
38. Carnivore was introduced to
the American people in early 2000 under the tenure of
Bill Clinton [Carnivore is a supremely powerful internet
gathering tool that extracts all forms of data from the
internet and massively archives it]. Why didn't
Bush inform us that snooping devices were created under
Bill Clinton, but just accepted the transition from a
free country to "One Nation Under Surveillance" as
seamless as the fight to make sure the American people
don't realize there is a global conspiracy?
39. If these devices then were
constructed already, were they used before 911 to snoop
the American people? If they were not used, how
could the government have known that situations would
work out where they would be necessary, and yet
entirely missed the threat of 911? (Carnivore was
revealed to the American people almost two years
previous!) If they were used, how could 911 have
still taken place and our leaders still inform us that
surveillance IS NOW NECESSARY?
40. Should the United
States "surrender" its war and attack for WMDs and
democracy and be embarrassed before the world? Or
should she finally win the war against a defeated and
contained dictator under no-fly-zones after six years
and be embarrassed before the world?
41. If we started an horrific
war for democracy, why do Bush and his propagandists and
supporters refuse to tell us what was the message of the
last (2006) elections?
42. Since Bush ignored the message of the last (2006)
elections while our troops are dying for "democracy,”
are they dying in vain?
43. What
will the world think of America if she "cowards out" from a
war started by brave people who got epileptic seizures by
watching a defeated and contained dictator playing with his
rubber-ducky in No-Fly-Zones?
44. "Conspiracy
Theorists" fear black helicopters. Others fear
no-fly-zones while constantly giving the "Conspiracy
Theorists" free mental diagnoses. One of these fears has
destroyed America and caused you all the trouble all your
lives. One of these fears will still yet cost you much
more as detainment camps are built. Which of these
fears is your actual enemy?
45.
Haven't you noticed that President John F. Kennedy never
addressed that new "terror group" called "Conspiracy
Theorists?" That group didn't seem to bother him at
all! As a matter of fact the expression was never made
nor heard in my ears for most of my life! You mean we
lived with these very dangerous people who never caused us
any problem throughout the entire history of America??
Under which presidential tenure did this expression and this
paranoid concern skyrocket so?
46. The war
supporters love to call the anti-war people "cowards" to
continue the war of aggression. Of the nations called,
"The Axis of Evil," why did the brave war supporters choose
the weakest and only defeated nation to start a war with?
47. Upon choosing that weak and
defeated nation from among, "The Axis of Evil," how is it
the brave war supporters spend a tragic six years, over a
trillion dollars, and waste the lives of thousands of
generations of innocents in the process and have not
succeeded yet?
This
rather prominent person
is rather immortal! He's taken the lives of
over 4300 American servicemen, and put America into
a 1.5 trillion dollar debt to a Communist country
that never held America's best interest.
It may
be likely that any other country would waste their
time attacking another already defeated dictator.
Saddam Hussein (in the
picture above) was not a very good person either!
48. Why is it that the Bush
Administration is the only single regime that can be used as
public record statistics to show a measurement of the power
of already defeated dictators for future reference?
How is the world
to know already defeated dictators are invincible, unless
some nutjob attacks one?
49. Would the legacy
of the Bush administration compel you to go to mortuaries to
attack the corpses there so that you can be hailed as a
victorious warrior and acquire a massive adrenaline rush?
How long will it take you to understand that corpses in
mortuaries are invincible?
50. How would Bush supporters
celebrate if we won this terrible 6 year struggle against an
already defeated dictator in new realms of
laughingstock-ism?
51. Will all the time, money, and
lives the Bush Administration put into fighting this false
war against a defeated and contained dictator, embolden the
terrorists?
52. Why after six years have the war
supporters not defeated the weakest and defeated nation of
the "Axis of Evil" Did their use of landfills and
Walter Reed Clinics against their own troops have something
to do with it?
53. Would you nominate President
Bush for a Nobel Peace Prize for shedding so much blood?
54. If not, would you nominate him
for a Nobel War Prize for struggling 6 yrs against an
already defeated dictator and can't win?
55. If you were
tired of wrestling for years with an old computer, wouldn't
it be refreshing to get an upgrade or a new one? If
you were tired wrestling 6 years in a war against an already
defeated dictator, wouldn't it be refreshing to upgrade and
attack another nation that was not already defeated? (Iran?)
How can we afford to
attack Iran in the face of the thought-police propagandists
all over the internet constantly posting how we're insane?
If we did that, wouldn't Iran become...
DEFEATED?
Wouldn't the propagandists that now dominate the government and all
societies of America and most other governments, then turn
white with fear?
56.
How come the best two ways to terrify someone in treason is
to show him a defeated dictator contained under
no-fly-zones, or to demand that all his testimony must be
given under oath??
57.
How is it that President Bush could not notice his father's
memoirs giving a very crucial warning against invading Iraq?
Why were those Bush, Sr. memoirs so correct?
President
Bush, Senior, from his memoirs:
Trying to eliminate Saddam
...would have incurred incalculable human and political
costs. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad, and, in
effect, rule Iraq.
Going in and occupying Iraq, thus
unilaterally exceeding the UN's mandate, would have
destroyed the precedent of international response to
aggression that we hoped to establish.
Had we gone
the invasion route, the US could conceivably still be an
occupying power in a bitterly hostile land.
58. How much of the
bankrupting billions funds for war for invisible WMDs did
our troops get?
59.
How do humans forge on to "success" and "victory" in false
war for WMDs and mistaken attack against
an already
defeated Muslim nation?
60. Does the following
sound reasonable: Adolf Hitler walks into an
auditorium filled with his opponents and cries, "I want you
all to submit a PLAN to solve the tragedies I caused, or get
da hell out da way!! Yah!!" In other words, if
no one
HAS A PLAN that can solve the astounding tragedies he
caused, no one has credibility but himself who caused the
tragedies, and all must get out of the way so that he can
continue to make the tragedy get worse.
61. If the Democrats
can't submit a plan for terror or war to compare with
Bush's, just then compare his terror plan with every other
president before him! Now, what did Bill Clinton tell
you was his terror plan when you asked him?
62.
You did ask Clinton for a terror plan, didn't you?
Bush Sr.? Reagan? You did ask them, huh?
What, you didn't??? If not, then why not? [They
didn't because no other president failed the American people
to have terrorism actually touch them, like Bush.]
63. Why do people do everything but
tell us in a free country that people must not believe there
is a conspiracy.
64. Why don't those who struggle to
make sure the American people stop saying there is a
conspiracy do anything against the leaders to make them to
understand that
persistent, growing daring and unprecedented suspicious
activity, coverups and constitutional tampering will make
people believe there is a conspiracy?
65. Why is every clear act of
treason or coverup labeled, "mistake," "botch-up," or
"error?" If all those escalating botch-ups and
mistakes suddenly vanish after Martial Law comes, will
people then be able to understand that there's a conspiracy?
66. America can't seem to capture
Osama Bin Laden even though she is still yet free! Are
you sure she will also not be able to catch you if Martial
Law is installed?
67. Why did the American forefathers
believe there was a global conspiracy, and why did this
cause them to insert the Second Amendment to arm citizens
against the federal government just in case, and become
"isolationists?"
68. Why do such people claim we are
paranoid to believe that a conspiracy exists, and stake much
time and pain to get us out of that, and remained silent
when Bush saw a contained and defeated dictator overseas and
started war with him on the premise that he would destroy
America and that it must be saved?
69.
Why don't strange participants on internet forums first
state to everyone that they must not believe there is a
conspiracy and state why? What is it on the internet
that wakes them up everywhere and approach anyone who writes
about that to then start a relentless insult campaign
against them? (None of those forums state on the forum
rules you must agree with thought police, nor that you
cannot honestly believe there is a conspiracy in a free
country.)
70. Why then do lies, coverups and
activities against the Constitution of the United States
then escalate so much notwithstanding certain people get
tortured by "conspiracy theorists?"
How come those who
can't sleep because the "Conspiracy theorists" are around
are the ones responsible for the suspicious activity growing
hour after hour?
71. How come in every single case
reported of voter fraud, irregularity or cheating, the only
party mentioned responsible for it is the Christian "family
values" party, the Republicans, while the amoral liberal
class, the Democrats, were always innocent? Are
creative forms of cheating crucial in re-electing George W.
Bush?
Should terrorists get trials in a free country?
Other than Osama, how did you know they were
terrorists before one? How would you know if
you actually are NOT one after Bush or one of his
subordinates accuses you of being one or colluding
with any?
72. Why, after so
many Americans--even by vote--struggle to stop this
"democracy-loving" president from shedding Arab and Muslim
blood, does Osama and the other terrorists reward them by
spending so much time, effort and money to attack everyone
else except that "democracy-loving" president? Why
attack those who try to stop that "democracy-loving"
president, knowing this will make the national leaders who
make decisions against Islam and Arabs much more powerful?
Bush then made an illegal war against an Arab nation taking
far more lives than 911.
73. What will happen
to the Arab and Muslim agenda, and when will mission be
accomplished for them by attacking the American people and
American soldiers instead of the leaders? When President
Bush becomes an absolute dictator? [He claims power
even above the Constitution of the United States especially
after terror attacks that he fails to protect the American
people from.]
74. Why do Bush propagandists all
over the internet evade and pretend we're not asking them
when they plan to urge Bush to go after Osama? They
conspicuously show that they want Osama to remain free.
75. Why then, in the month of June
2008 did Barrack Obama claim that he doesn't want Osama to
be a martyr for whatever reasons he mentioned, but didn't
have a problem with Saddam being one? Should Osama
live because he attacked America and Saddam must die because
he did not?
76. Why then would propagandists
laugh at the prospect of "terrorists" having trials,
claiming it would be ridiculous for Osama Bin Laden to have
a trial, after allowing Saddam Hussein a trial and proper
due process above the Patriot Act? Why can't anyone
see this is the monumental proof that the Patriot Act, never
used nor needed before in America, is not needed now?
Can't you understand that Saddam got a privilege denied to
the American citizens since one president failed to protect
beyond precedent??
IF EVEN SADDAM GOT
DUE PROCESS, IT IS QUITE CLEAR THAT ANYONE CAN!
77. Why do we give much more respect
to these terrorists and believe they are so much smarter
when, some 45 years ago, terrorists took care of President
John F. Kennedy in such a way that he was much much weaker
in contrast today with terrorists who attack everything else
but President Bush and thence make him much, much stronger?
78. If interrogations and even
secret ones are important to protect us from terror, as the
Bush team claims, why do they themselves spit on the
practice and show that they are actual hindrances?
Watch Attorney General Alberto
Gonzalez spit on the practice of interrogations without
shame before the entire globe and play the Jesuit in just
the same way as the strange posters on the internet who
condone genocide:
(He was being asked questions not even directly
related to terrorism. Notice how he constantly
repeats giving replies that don't answer the
questions).
79. From what we see in last question showing
Alberto Gonzalez evading answering some of the
simplest questions without shame in front of the
entire globe (like the massive propaganda team on
the internet that would jump on you if you believe
in a free country that there's a global conspiracy),
why do thought police approach us and tell us we
dare not assume that because of that, the Bush team
is involved in any kind of treason?
80. Why then did these same
thought police remain quiet when Bush brought the
Patriot Act and claimed he can ASSUME that any
American is a terrorist or is involved with
terrorists, and then can become a detainee and held
without charge indefinitely? Why is the Bush
team allowed to assume anything against billions,
and their vast propaganda team go irate if we ASSUME
anything about Bush or his close comrades?
81. Can Schumer,
interviewing Alberto Gonzalez, and the entire
Congressional panel then assume Gonzalez is guilty
and punish him based upon his complete disrespect of
the reviewing process and the entire globe LIKE ALL
THE JUDGE SHOWS ON TV OBVIOUSLY WOULD?
82. If not, CAN DETAINEES
RESPOND IN JUST THE SAME WAY AS GONZALEZ DOES AND
THEN MUST BE FREED FROM ALL GUILT AND ASSUMPTIONS?
[Thought police responded by saying the situation is
different because detainees are different from our
national leaders. Our response was that Bush
claims on paper that ANYONE can gain detainee status
on his mere whim even though he has had direct ties
to every
element involved in the 911 disaster (Osama and the
Saudis) for years and all America has not!]
83. Is President Bush
finally, in the entire history of the globe, the
only secretive closed-doors president in history who
is not involved in treason?
84. Why did
Bush claim that Iran's secrecy about its nuclear
program is proof that it's developing nuclear
weapons and will not accept Iran claiming it is
secret for "national security" concerns or for their
necessity to have "executive privilege?" [Remember
these were the tactics used for president Bush to
make everything about his unprecedented actions
appear
legitimate and American.
He also claimed "executive privilege" when asked to
turn over documents revealing why 8 top prosecutors
were fired abruptly on the claim their performance
was not up to par.]
85. Why, after the American
people finally knew the name "Osama Bin-Laden" and
the danger he posed to America, did Bush boldly tell
them and the globe that he is not going after Osama?
86. Why then do
propagandists constantly tell us that Bill Clinton
is responsible for 911 and for Osama not being
caught as yet? Of the two, only GW Bush boldly
told us he is not going after Osama, after the name
Osama became a household name. Bush is also
the only one who refused to testify alone and under
oath during the much obstructed and much belated 911
investigations. How come when Bush
propagandists show us letters from soldiers who have
died in Iraq, which say they are dying for our
freedoms, and we then ask them if they will urge
Bush to go after Osama in lieu of the horrific loss
of life, they go silent and conspicuously evade?
[We keep asking them about this and they ignore us
and evade, SHOWING CONSPICUOUSLY THAT THEY ALSO WANT
OSAMA TO REMAIN FREE!] Are these the same ones
blaming Bill Clinton for 911 claiming that he let
Osama run free?
87. Why do people tell us
that 911 took place because former President Bill
Clinton failed to protect us? They claimed he
was laxed on terror.
88. Why then was former
President Bill Clinton more stringent against
terrorism than all the other presidents before him?
89. How come then the more
backward we go into history is the more laxed each
administration was against TERROR, and yet the more
terrorism didn't bother us? [Even the word was
not in the textbooks or anywhere else when Grandma
was growing up. Acts of war were known, but
any claim that the sky was falling because of Middle
Eastern terrorists and thence the Constitution needs
to be trashed by the crusaders against paranoia did
not take place, and neither did the Patriot Act: a
"vital" law that was missing for the entire spread
of the existence of the United States, and that
comes only with Bush and any other New World Order
regime change devotee. All such principles for
security were only adopted by the Communists, Nazis
and other brutal regimes in contrast to America].
90. Why couldn't terrorists
have thought to attack us internally before?
[They
did, but couldn't. All positions of protection
were mostly staffed by true Americans. Also
Middle Eastern Muslim extremists feared a backlash
from a major superpower with their hands filled with
Israel enough as it was. They feared more
blood would be taken by the United States than they
would take. More
importantly, their leaders feared death either for
being cowardly, or because they believed if they
were killed, their cause for
global treason would be destroyed.
The
situation changed when our national leaders actually
had ties to these Muslim terrorists and now their
Muslim leaders give the terrorists and suicide
bombers orders to do the unthinkable. The
Muslim leaders order their servants to do it anyway,
knowing these leaders themselves will escape harm,
even though generations of Muslims will be killed in
consequence: betrayal against Muslims by their
leaders also.]
91. Why do such people teach
us that a president now unprecedented in failing to
protect the American people must be made a king and
rewarded for failing to protect us unlike all the
other presidents before him?
92.
If Bush is so fabulously rewarded for failing to
protect us, why should even future presidents want
to protect us? How come every other president
before him couldn't think of just failing to protect
us so that they can acquire powers even above the
Constitution and possibly become dictators? [The
reason they couldn't is because they didn't have so
many others saturated throughout the government and
infiltrated into all political parties that would
allow such things.]
93. Since Bush is being so
fabulously rewarded for failing to protect us, how
are we going to honor those presidents before him
who did not fail to protect us? Should they
then be condemned instead?
94.
If you wanted to hire a security guard to protect
your business or home, what would be your response
to one at the door who tells you he will give you
911 quality security for your interests?
95. Are you prepared to
accept the fact that if security guards struggle for
employment from the Bush supporters to protect their
interests and tell the Bush propagandists that they
will offer them 911 quality security for their
interests, the Bush propagandists will hire them and
make them king over all their affairs?
96. Besides the massive
propaganda team, why were the American people afraid
to vote for John Kerry because they felt he was weak
on security issues when George Bush failed to
protect the American people unprecedented in the
entire history of America?
97. Why did President Bush
become paranoid over the threat Iraq that we beat so
badly in Operation Desert Storm could pose, when, in
the late 70s while I was in college, I was informed
that the surveillance capabilities of America were
good enough to see a basketball on the ground from
space? And we still couldn't know that Iraq
had no WMDs? Iraq didn't have these advantages
of aerial surveillance against us, but Bush told us
that even if no WMDs were there, he would have
attacked Iraq anyway in order to "SAVE AMERICA!"
People
are forgetting that direct quotation.
98.
Why did Bush
tell us that torture is necessary for extracting
information that could save lives, and therefore
included it in his security and foreign policies,
AND YET FORGOT TO TORTURE SADDAM TO EVEN REVEAL
WHERE HIS WMDS WERE STASHED??? [He named
Saddam as the main man in terror! On paper,
every American is lower than Saddam and will not
receive the due process he received! Bush
didn't torture Saddam to reveal where he stashed his
WMDs obviously because Bush knew Saddam had none!
Saddam didn't suffer from the Patriot Act at all!
Is it therefore that necessary? Saddam was
caught and was in our hands. Others were
tortured by us.]
99. If it is a fact that
only a perfect man is eligible to be given the right
to destroy people based merely on an accusation
without due process, why does the High Court and
Congress determine--especially as shown through the
confirmation of Sam Alito to the court--that
President Bush must have these rights based upon
failing to protect the American people without
precedent???
100. LIES COST TIME, MONEY,
AND BLOOD!...
Ted Bundy, Rush Limbaugh,
Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly: which of these
men cost America the least amount of time, effort,
money, heartache AND BLOOD?
101. Why after people
protest the unprecedented reign of GW Bush,
propagandists stand up and scream they are "bashing
America?" Will such people have detainment
camps big enough to wipe the 2006 protest vote
"against America" out of history? The 2006
vote was a protest vote BY
AMERICA against President Bush, NOT against
America!
102. What did Bush do wrong,
other than kill our sons and daughters for invisible
WMDs and still yet does not blush, but claims he
must be made king?
Before the Inquisitions return upon the
earth again by the Antichrist, it will start
THIS WAY!
103. How is it that the more
our sons and daughters die to "defend our freedoms,"
is the more the Bush propagandists on the internet
are talking about Martial Law coming and detainment
camps?
104. Why does Bush and Blair
keep saying that "history will prove" the Iraq War
was the right thing to do, AFTER we used valuable
resources searching for WMDs and never found them?
Isn't it a bummer that we used principles for
security directly right out of even ancient history
to deal with all this and to frame our security
principles? Is it true history didn't yet
prove that principles for security from the
Communists and Nazis would lead to disaster?
105. Isn't it a pity we
can't tell that history already proved that
following the communist and Nazi regimes will only
lead to disaster, but the people from there ordering
us back to those principles can only keep telling us
we have to wait so history can prove it again?
Should we carry tape recorders with us into
detention camps when Martial Law comes and play it
to the government when they prepare to tell us while
in there, that history will prove all they have done
was the right thing to do?
106. Why has "doing what I
believe is best for the country" includes swearing
an oath of allegiance to the Constitution with every
intent to completely disregard it? Why has
this replaced obedience to the Constitution being
sworn to? What then if everything messes up?
After everything messes up, will those who do this
recognize that it's their hatred of the Constitution
that made everything mess up?
107. Mr. Tony Blair
and Mr. Bush: Did you know that every fascist
regime had leaders who always did what they thought
was best for their countries?
108. Why do
propagandists on the internet constantly telling us
President Bush is the best president we ever had
with unique principles that are the best ever to
handle terrorism, never show us the posts they made
on the internet with concern for terrorism before
Bush came?
109. Why do treasonous
leaders and propagandists everywhere attack us
claiming we have a "pre-911 mentality" to actually
expect that the government is supposed to have the
power to protect us from terrorists
like it always has since the
beginning, and urge us to give that up now?
110. Why are those in
treason constantly telling us we cannot afford to
have the "pre-911 mentality" of giving trials to
terrorists,
AFTER ALREADY
TELLING US THROUGH THE PATRIOT ACT THAT ANYONE CAN
ACQUIRE TERRORIST STATUS ON THE WHIM OF THE ONLY
PRESIDENT WE KNOW OF WHO HAS HAD BOTH TIES TO OSAMA
BIN LADEN AND THE SAUDIS?
111. Does Susan
Williams believe terrorists should actually have
trials?? Answer: NO! Terrorists
should not be given civilian trials!
A terrorist is supposed to
be someone WHO ALREADY HAS BEEN OPENLY TRIED AND
THEN FOUND TO BE A TERRORIST! If he's a
terrorist before a free and open trial, then someone
who accused him DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THE AMERICAN
PRINCIPLE THAT ALL ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTIL
PROVEN GUILTY!
112. What kind of
absolute jackass would support making sure
terrorists don't get trials or humane treatment
without first making sure the Patriot Act doesn't
have the ability to make any American acquire that
status for any reason the President wants? It
couldn't be the American citizens, could it?
You would support making sure terrorists don't get
trials while the Patriot Act claims you can be
declared one for any reason the most failing
president in US history wants??
113. How come treason
then constantly insists they can torture and do
anything they want with any "terrorist" WHILE MAKING
SURE THEY AVOID EXPLAINING TO THE PEOPLE HOW THE
PERSON WHO IS A TERRORIST GOT THAT STATUS? If
there is to be no trials, how did the terrorist
become a terrorist?
Because of corporate treason, as the
Antichrist grows stronger, people with much
experience in politics will be making
"mistakes" so bad, it would be better to
elect the inexperienced who even earn
minimum wage!
IF YOU CAN IMPEACH THESE AND THE ENTIRE
CONGRESS BOTH DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN,
[Independents too!]
THEN, AND ONLY THEN, CAN PRESIDENT BUSH BE
IMPEACHED!
Treason of the
Supreme Court, the United Nations, and Congress
114.
Why didn't the
Supreme Court realize that "Conspiracy Theorists"
would have allowed an election recount if votes are
not sure instead of becoming paranoid and stopping a
recount and then sending propaganda periodicals to
tell us that Bush would have won anyway?
115. Why did the Supreme
Court finally realize that President Bush
overstepped his authority at Guantanamo Bay acquired
through failing to protect the American people, when
even multitudes of mentally retarded folk figured
that out a long time ago? Is one requirement
for the High Court to have bad reflexes?
116. Why does the Supreme
Court, realizing the many unprecedented mistakes of
President Bush to even the embarrassing starting of
an illegal war in paranoia, looking for invisible
WMDs to the taking of multitudes of lives, still
struggle to maintain the right to make him a
dictator and give the whole farm over to him?
117. How come the Supreme
Court and Congress cannot understand that Bush has a
talent to give inaccurate information to billions of
people? Why then would they want to empower
him to destroy a person merely by making an
accusation considering the accuracy of much of what
he says? He doesn't make "mistakes?" Why
then forbid any of his victims under accusation to
prove he has made any?
119. Do members of the High
Court and Congress know that the "Conspiracy
Theorists" would have gotten rid of any government
official who has a talent of giving inaccurate
information a long time ago, and that promises,
government aspirations and records cannot survive if
one in the highest office is proud to habitually
give inaccurate information to the globe?
120. Why didn't the High
Court nor Congress consider it strange that Bush
actually
proudly showed
pictures of 911 for his re-election campaign since
Bush failed to protect the American people on that
fateful day? Is this action supposed to
communicate the same kind of grief Bush showed when
he stood up on the pulpit of 911, and with tears
stated that he will destroy all evil and that all
who are not with us are with the terrorists?
121. Why didn't the High
Court nor Congress consider it strange that a
president would claim the powers of a king for
failing to protect the American people?
Would any
future president claiming credit for protecting
America be condemned?
122. Who would think
there is a conspiracy and why would our national
leaders hyperventilate because Americans at least
believe there is a global one when the country saw
only one politician voted against the institution of
the Patriot Act after 911, and then only because HE
READ THE PROPOSALS FIRST???
123. Why did the Democrats
fail to mention all during the
2006 campaign
that "impeachment is off the table," and that they
would rather work with the problem (Bush) instead?
124. Why did they claim they
will not "take revenge" on President Bush, giving a
precedent where it would be prudent for American
government to release all prisoners in jail because
it was unbecoming of the government to "take
revenge" on them?
125. Why were the Democrats
so eager to betray the American people, till they
couldn't even wait till they sat in their seats of
power, but unleashed that they would not impeach
president Bush just after the election results?
126. Why did House
Speaker
Nancy Pelosi, on July 17,
2008, call President Bush a "total failure" in his
presidency,
after heading a Congress that constantly gave him
everything he wanted not since day one, BUT EVEN
BEFORE DAY ONE? [Before they even sat in
power, just after the elections of 2006, the newly
elected Democratic Congress suddenly started to say
that they will not impeach President Bush, but would
work with him. This shocking news they avoided
to let the people know during the entire campaign
for their election. Since that shocking
announcement, they kept that promise better than any
other they had made. Why therefore does Nancy
Pelosi claim President Bush is a failure when
President Bush SUCCEEDED almost 100% in getting them
to do what he wants?]
127.
Why did the Democrats suddenly acquire the reasoning
of President Bush after they were elected to finally
check him, and began to say that they could not
defund the war and therefore leave our soldiers out
there ill-equipped? If even janitors were
elected to de-fund the war and then kept their
campaign promises, would they then leave the troops
out there after the war is defunded? INSANITY!
128. Why did Al Gore
willingly concede defeat to the 2000 elections that
were wrested from him, and then now urges that
President Bush must not be impeached because trying
to do so would not be successful? Why has John
Kerry done the same? (This great nation came into
being by humble people who saw no true means of
succeeding the vast job of creating it, but claimed
it was the right thing to do anyway and moved ahead
undaunted!)
NANCY PELOSI: "Bush, you are a FAILURE
as a president!
At least you got everything you wanted from
me 100% of the time even against the wishes
of the American people! It's a good
thing you didn't ask me for any other
favors!"
129. Why then don't the
American people understand that Bush cannot be
impeached without the same being done to the High
Court Justices, Republican members of Congress and
most Democratic members of Congress?
130. Why do members of the
other branches of government constantly claim that
Bush can't be impeached because he is too powerful?
Why can't the American people teach them that it is
their job description to check the executive branch
of government to make sure he doesn't get "too
powerful" so they can get a good job approval rating
that justifies their high salaries? Would they
be willing to change the requirements for office,
step aside and hire janitors to do what they are
supposed to? Would the janitors fail?
131. If we consider that,
for some strange reason, we have been rather free of
terror attacks before Bush, could it be because
terrorists had something to fear because of all the
other presidents before Bush?
132. What then could have
ended the fear terrorists had of American presidents
when Bush came besides Bush's strong efforts to sell
our ports over to the United Arab Emirates who
financed 911?
133. How come because of
Bush's failure to protect the American people, all
the American people are automatic suspects to
terrorism when he is the only person most Americans
know of who has actual family ties to terrorists?
[The Bin Laden family
and the
Saudis.]
134.
If Russia suddenly attacked and destroyed Canada
(hypothetically) on our borders because they thought
Canada had WMDs, and after finding they were wrong,
did not blush but remained as an occupying power,
should America arm itself? Should America
meddle? Why is it that the High Court,
Congress and the United Nations can't understand
that Iran has a right to do this? Do you think
America should meddle or arm herself if Russia
destroyed Canada? Why does the High Court,
Congress and the United Nations still believe there
is no consequence for starting a false war of
aggression after
insulting and ignoring
massive forces
that struggled to stop them from making the mistake?
How come we never heard
much about this situation with Iran's nuclear
program before the Constitutionally illegal Iraq
War?
135.
Why is the Bush Administration covering up the
destruction of CIA tapes documenting aggressive
interrogation techniques by the government against
suspected terrorists?
136. The
government said they had to destroy the tapes, or
else the identities of the interrogators could
become known and they could be jeopardized.
Would that then make these interrogators acquire the
status of Valerie Plame? [She was the woman
who was a CIA operative whose identity was
compromised by the Bush Administration.
Her husband was critical of the
Bush Administration.]
137. Should
we interrupt Osama having Thanksgiving dinner to ask
him whether he feels President Bush has been a great
success in American security?
If not, then how about next
Thanksgiving?
138. Besides the Third
Reich, is there another regime that would start wars
in order to "save innocent lives" and then take much
more innocent lives?
139. What is
the secret to Bush's very strong desire to "save
innocent lives" all over the world? If you
were able to acquire his Skull & Bones insignia,
would you then acquire the same desire to start wars
to save innocent lives? [It's the same
insignia the Nazis war on their uniforms].
A MESSAGE FROM THE THIRD REICH!...
"BIG DEAL! We also used war to save
innocent lives and took much more than our
enemies we had to stop, Mr. Bush! You
ain't got nothin' on us!"
140. Since
Saddam was ruthless and took much innocent life,
what happened to the scorecards and statistics of
innocent lives being lost after Bush decided to walk
in the steps of Nazis? What percent reduction
of lives lost did we gain?
141. If ghosts are
real, why do they always forget to haunt people of
the likes of Ted Bundy, Osama Bin Laden, Adolf
Hitler, Joseph Stalin or George Bush and the
Congress?
142. How come, with all of
this, those who still insist we must not know there
is a conspiracy, struggle to make sure that these
clearly treasonous activities escalate day after day
after day?
The Invalidity of
the 911 Independent Investigations
143. Why did such people
allow and fight to make us believe it is normal for
an "independent investigation" of the most major
internal tragedy in the United States to take place
at least
a year after the event? Why are they
determined no one must believe there is something
wrong with this? (The proper way to handle all
tragedies is to stage thorough investigation right
away. That way evidence is fresh and people
interviewed will make statements that can be matched
with their later statements to test their
coherency.) ["Conspiracy theorists" would have
allowed the late investigation to get as much
information as possible, but would have declared the
whole endeavor basically INVALID for being staged so
late!
It sure doesn't
look like all the hyped-up experts and professionals
excel over the "conspiracy theorists" on this point.
I suppose that's why we never suffered from the
"conspiracy theorists" but have always only been
suffering from the "experts" who can't function
without solid proof for everything except WMDs!]
144. Why do such expect us
to believe that under the weight of 3,000 graves,
the president who failed to protect them can refuse
to testify cleanly under oath at the investigation
that took place
so much later,
and wound up finally testifying not under oath, but
at the same time with the second most honest person
in the world (Dick Cheney) does not give fuel to the
big bad ol' "conspiracy theorists?" Just the weight
of 3,000 graves would force any American to testify
trembling, let alone their protector supposed to
give them protection they paid high taxes for!
The Cost of Energy
Tripled Since the Bush Administration
145. Why, since the Bush
Administration, did fuel prices uniquely get so high
and the American people can't figure out why, even
though Bush struggled to sell our ports over to the
United Arab Emirates who were involved in financing
911?
Why can't even
fuel prices regularly falling only at election time,
convince certain people that a certain person bears
heavy responsibility?
146. Supply, demand,
developing China, developing India, offshore oil
drilling restrictions, weak dollar, record fuel
prices quadrupled that lowers every time Bush is in
elections: Only one of these things came after
Bush became president. Can you figure out
which? Why did supply, demand, China, India,
offshore oil drilling restrictions and a weak dollar
wait for Bush to arrive to produce record fuel
prices quadrupled?
147.
Who would make the American people vote for an
oilman for president and then have no idea why fuel
prices would triple above all history?
The South American
Country of Paraquay
148. Why did President Bush
become the only American president to have an
interest in and buy thousands of acres of land in
the South American country of Paraquay? [That
country is famous for granting asylum to war
criminals and Nazis. Even Bush's daughters are
learning to speak Spanish over there!]
149.
Why doesn't Bush know that country is famous for
harboring Nazi war criminals and therefore put that
country on his hitlist for the Global War on Terror?
150.
Why, before buying land in the South American
country of Paraguay, did Bush first secure an
agreement that he and heavily armed soldiers with
him be not tried for war crimes? Why no desire
to clear his name?
If he knows already that he's a
war criminal, why can't his propagandists figure it
out?
BOLD PUBLIC DEATH THREATS AGAINST ALL WHO ARE NOT
CATHOLIC POSTED JUST AFTER 911 AND OUR NEW ERA OF TERROR! POSTED AFTER THE
PATRIOT ACT BY FLAGRANT BUSH SUPPORTERS!
The posters who did this not only showed that the
Patriot Act didn't deter them in any way, but that the Patriot Act made them
to more issue the death threats!
If you were a Presbyterian, an
Anglican, a Lutheran, or a Baptist, would times come
when you will find the urge to indulge in this?...
Alright then, if you were a
Presbyterian, an Anglican, a
Lutheran, a Baptist, or even a Methodist like the
following unfortunate person claims to be, would
times come when you will find the urge to indulge in
this?...
Bush attends an Episcopal
church in Washington and
belongs to a Methodist
church in
Texas, and his political
base is solidly evangelical.
Yet this Protestant
president has surrounded
himself with Roman Catholic
intellectuals,
speechwriters, professors,
priests, bishops and
politicians. These Catholics
-- and thus Catholic social
teaching -- have for the
past eight years been
shaping Bush's speeches,
policies and legacy to a
degree perhaps unprecedented
in U.S. history.
"I used
to say that there are more
Catholics on President
Bush's speechwriting team
than on any Notre Dame
starting lineup in the past
half-century," said former
Bush scribe -- and Catholic
-- William McGurn.
Bush has also placed
Catholics in prominent roles
in the federal government
and relied on Catholic
tradition to make a public
case for everything from his
faith-based initiative to
antiabortion legislation.
[NOW
HIS SECURITY PRINCIPLES:
THE PATRIOT ACT!]
He has wedded
Catholic intellectualism
with evangelical political
savvy to forge a powerful
electoral coalition.
Part 4:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/patriotact.htm What is the actual purpose of the Patriot Act. Strange people in
dialogue prove that the actual purpose of the Patriot Act is directly opposite
to the purposes advertised to the world from those who created and instituted
it.
Part 5:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/iraqwar.htm What is the actual purpose for war.
Not just the Iraq war, but virtually every other America has had.
The bible itself shows that what comes after war is tyranny! A brief
insight to how this takes place.
Part 7:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/AC/AppealChapMark666.htm
DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE MARK OF THE BEAST IS??
A strange and horrible dilemma
and predicament will face the entire globe very soon. It will bring on
the greatest crisis in the history of the earth! This predicament is
coming at lightning speed totally undetected by the world.
The bible itself shows that
what comes after war is tyranny! A brief insight to how this takes
place.
Part 8:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/majultimatum.htm
A most amazing major future development
will create a great crisis. We look more specifically into what this
crisis will entail on this page. This crisis will cause even God's
people to literally fight with all desperation for their entitlement to the
after-life. This same crisis will cause the rest of the global
population to achieve a terrible accountability of guilt that will force
each one of them to receive a damnation far above even any of the murderers
or serial killers of the 20th century!
THE HOLY SCRIPTURES, VS "THE BAD BOYS!"
... A sad, heart-rending showing as
members of the US military on forums post EMPHATICALLY how America will lose
its honor, strength and liberty, OVER THEIR DEAD BODIES! All this
compared with scripture which says precisely THAT IT WILL DO JUST THAT!
WHO ARE OUR ENEMIES,
THIS TIME!! Enemies which caused America to beat the war drums and
become concerned about security, came and went!! What happened to
them when America beat them in conflict AND WHEN SHE DID NOT??
HOSTILITY AND WHAT CAUSES
IT!... Why some of our worst enemies which cost us so much and
challenged our very existence, wound up now being called our friends! Important message about the behavior of our national leaders
and current society that will lead to dangerous and traumatic events in just the
near future!
Part
2:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/AC/AppealChapIntro2.htm
Our Bold Move, showing how we entered into debate with some very strange
people who encouraged all kinds of conflicting debates and classes, AND WON!
These strange people understand what the American citizens do not, about
shocking events soon to overtake them. A strange message from heaven showing the world there is no excuse for its
current confusion, and that failing to search into end-time prophecies will
result in a curse upon all.
Part 3:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/AC/AppealChapIntro3.htm
Why does the bible curse anyone who refuses to look into the prophecies?
Simple examples from prophecy showing what heaven thinks of the intelligence of
the world today and what actually are the worst global problems few are
noticing.
Part 6:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/AC/AppealChapIntro6.htm
This page shows that everything that is taking place against American
principle currently is happening because of infiltration into our society by
militant infiltrationist Jesuits. That is a generic term that we use to
identify all the orders of the Papacy that constantly work to acquire positions
in every area of life in our society with the pre-meditated intent to destroy it
and to reinstall the Inquisitions. We reveal some of their typical tactics
here.