79. From what we see in last question showing Alberto Gonzalez evading answering some of the simplest questions without shame in front of the entire globe (like the massive propaganda team on the internet that would jump on you if you believe in a free country that there's a global conspiracy), why do thought police approach us and tell us we dare not assume that because of that, the Bush team is involved in any kind of treason?

80. Why then did these same thought police remain quiet when Bush brought the Patriot Act and claimed he can ASSUME that any American is a terrorist or is involved with terrorists, and then can become a detainee and held without charge indefinitely?  Why is the Bush team allowed to assume anything against billions, and their vast propaganda team go irate if we ASSUME anything about Bush or his close comrades?

81. Can Schumer, interviewing Alberto Gonzalez, and the entire Congressional panel then assume Gonzalez is guilty and punish him based upon his complete disrespect of the reviewing process and the entire globe LIKE ALL THE JUDGE SHOWS ON TV OBVIOUSLY WOULD?

82. If not, CAN DETAINEES RESPOND IN JUST THE SAME WAY AS GONZALEZ DOES AND THEN MUST BE FREED FROM ALL GUILT AND ASSUMPTIONS?  [Thought police responded by saying the situation is different because detainees are different from our national leaders.  Our response was that Bush claims on paper that ANYONE can gain detainee status on his mere whim even though he has had direct ties to every element involved in the 911 disaster (Osama and the Saudis) for years and all America has not!]

83. Is President Bush finally, in the entire history of the globe, the only secretive closed-doors president in history who is not involved in treason?

84. Why did Bush claim that Iran's secrecy about its nuclear program is proof that it's developing nuclear weapons and will not accept Iran claiming it is secret for "national security" concerns or for their necessity to have "executive privilege?" [Remember these were the tactics used for president Bush to make everything about his unprecedented actions appear legitimate and American.  He also claimed "executive privilege" when asked to turn over documents revealing why 8 top prosecutors were fired abruptly on the claim their performance was not up to par.]

85. Why, after the American people finally knew the name "Osama Bin-Laden" and the danger he posed to America, did Bush boldly tell them and the globe that he is not going after Osama?

86. Why then do propagandists constantly tell us that Bill Clinton is responsible for 911 and for Osama not being caught as yet?  Of the two, only GW Bush boldly told us he is not going after Osama, after the name Osama became a household name.  Bush is also the only one who refused to testify alone and under oath during the much obstructed and much belated 911 investigations.  How come when Bush propagandists show us letters from soldiers who have died in Iraq, which say they are dying for our freedoms, and we then ask them if they will urge Bush to go after Osama in lieu of the horrific loss of life, they go silent and conspicuously evade?  [We keep asking them about this and they ignore us and evade, SHOWING CONSPICUOUSLY THAT THEY ALSO WANT OSAMA TO REMAIN FREE!]  Are these the same ones blaming Bill Clinton for 911 claiming that he let Osama run free?

87. Why do people tell us that 911 took place because former President Bill Clinton failed to protect us?  They claimed he was laxed on terror.

88. Why then was former President Bill Clinton more stringent against terrorism than all the other presidents before him?

89. How come then the more backward we go into history is the more laxed each administration was against TERROR, and yet the more terrorism didn't bother us?  [Even the word was not in the textbooks or anywhere else when Grandma was growing up.  Acts of war were known, but any claim that the sky was falling because of Middle Eastern terrorists and thence the Constitution needs to be trashed by the crusaders against paranoia did not take place, and neither did the Patriot Act: a "vital" law that was missing for the entire spread of the existence of the United States, and that comes only with Bush and any other New World Order regime change devotee.  All such principles for security were only adopted by the Communists, Nazis and other brutal regimes in contrast to America].

90. Why couldn't terrorists have thought to attack us internally before?  [They did, but couldn't.  All positions of protection were mostly staffed by true Americans.  Also Middle Eastern Muslim extremists feared a backlash from a major superpower with their hands filled with Israel enough as it was.  They feared more blood would be taken by the United States than they would take.  More importantly, their leaders feared death either for being cowardly, or because they believed if they were killed, their cause for global treason would be destroyed.  The situation changed when our national leaders actually had ties to these Muslim terrorists and now their Muslim leaders give the terrorists and suicide bombers orders to do the unthinkable.  The Muslim leaders order their servants to do it anyway, knowing these leaders themselves will escape harm, even though generations of Muslims will be killed in consequence: betrayal against Muslims by their leaders also.]

91. Why do such people teach us that a president now unprecedented in failing to protect the American people must be made a king and rewarded for failing to protect us unlike all the other presidents before him?

92. If Bush is so fabulously rewarded for failing to protect us, why should even future presidents want to protect us?  How come every other president before him couldn't think of just failing to protect us so that they can acquire powers even above the Constitution and possibly become dictators? [The reason they couldn't is because they didn't have so many others saturated throughout the government and infiltrated into all political parties that would allow such things.]

93. Since Bush is being so fabulously rewarded for failing to protect us, how are we going to honor those presidents before him who did not fail to protect us?  Should they then be condemned instead?

94. If you wanted to hire a security guard to protect your business or home, what would be your response to one at the door who tells you he will give you 911 quality security for your interests?

95. Are you prepared to accept the fact that if security guards struggle for employment from the Bush supporters to protect their interests and tell the Bush propagandists that they will offer them 911 quality security for their interests, the Bush propagandists will hire them and make them king over all their affairs?

96. Besides the massive propaganda team, why were the American people afraid to vote for John Kerry because they felt he was weak on security issues when George Bush failed to protect the American people unprecedented in the entire history of America?

97. Why did President Bush become paranoid over the threat Iraq that we beat so badly in Operation Desert Storm could pose, when, in the late 70s while I was in college, I was informed that the surveillance capabilities of America were good enough to see a basketball on the ground from space?  And we still couldn't know that Iraq had no WMDs?  Iraq didn't have these advantages of aerial surveillance against us, but Bush told us that even if no WMDs were there, he would have attacked Iraq anyway in order to "SAVE AMERICA!"  People are forgetting that direct quotation.

98. Why did Bush tell us that torture is necessary for extracting information that could save lives, and therefore included it in his security and foreign policies, AND YET FORGOT TO TORTURE SADDAM TO EVEN REVEAL WHERE HIS WMDS WERE STASHED???  [He named Saddam as the main man in terror!  On paper, every American is lower than Saddam and will not receive the due process he received!  Bush didn't torture Saddam to reveal where he stashed his WMDs obviously because Bush knew Saddam had none!  Saddam didn't suffer from the Patriot Act at all!  Is it therefore that necessary?  Saddam was caught and was in our hands.  Others were tortured by us.]

99. If it is a fact that only a perfect man is eligible to be given the right to destroy people based merely on an accusation without due process, why does the High Court and Congress determine--especially as shown through the confirmation of Sam Alito to the court--that President Bush must have these rights based upon failing to protect the American people without precedent???

101. Why after people protest the unprecedented reign of GW Bush, propagandists stand up and scream they are "bashing America?"  Will such people have detainment camps big enough to wipe the 2006 protest vote "against America" out of history?  The 2006 vote was a protest vote BY AMERICA against President Bush, NOT against America!

102. What did Bush do wrong, other than kill our sons and daughters for invisible WMDs and still yet does not blush, but claims he must be made king?

Before the Inquisitions return upon the earth again by the Antichrist, it will start THIS WAY!

103. How is it that the more our sons and daughters die to "defend our freedoms," is the more the Bush propagandists on the internet are talking about Martial Law coming and detainment camps?

104. Why does Bush and Blair keep saying that "history will prove" the Iraq War was the right thing to do, AFTER we used valuable resources searching for WMDs and never found them?  Isn't it a bummer that we used principles for security directly right out of even ancient history to deal with all this and to frame our security principles?  Is it true history didn't yet prove that principles for security from the Communists and Nazis would lead to disaster?

105. Isn't it a pity we can't tell that history already proved that following the communist and Nazi regimes will only lead to disaster, but the people from there ordering us back to those principles can only keep telling us we have to wait so history can prove it again?  Should we carry tape recorders with us into detention camps when Martial Law comes and play it to the government when they prepare to tell us while in there, that history will prove all they have done was the right thing to do?

106. Why has "doing what I believe is best for the country" includes swearing an oath of allegiance to the Constitution with every intent to completely disregard it?  Why has this replaced obedience to the Constitution being sworn to?  What then if everything messes up?  After everything messes up, will those who do this recognize that it's their hatred of the Constitution that made everything mess up?

107.  Mr. Tony Blair and Mr. Bush:  Did you know that every fascist regime had leaders who always did what they thought was best for their countries?

108. Why do propagandists on the internet constantly telling us President Bush is the best president we ever had with unique principles that are the best ever to handle terrorism, never show us the posts they made on the internet with concern for terrorism before Bush came?

109. Why do treasonous leaders and propagandists everywhere attack us claiming we have a "pre-911 mentality" to actually expect that the government is supposed to have the power to protect us from terrorists like it always has since the beginning, and urge us to give that up now?

110.  Why are those in treason constantly telling us we cannot afford to have the "pre-911 mentality" of giving trials to terrorists, AFTER ALREADY TELLING US THROUGH THE PATRIOT ACT THAT ANYONE CAN ACQUIRE TERRORIST STATUS ON THE WHIM OF THE ONLY PRESIDENT WE KNOW OF WHO HAS HAD BOTH TIES TO OSAMA BIN LADEN AND THE SAUDIS?

111.  Does Susan Williams believe terrorists should actually have trials??  Answer:  NO!  Terrorists should not be given civilian trials! 

A terrorist is supposed to be someone WHO ALREADY HAS BEEN OPENLY TRIED AND THEN FOUND TO BE A TERRORIST!  If he's a terrorist before a free and open trial, then someone who accused him DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THE AMERICAN PRINCIPLE THAT ALL ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!

112.  What kind of absolute jackass would support making sure terrorists don't get trials or humane treatment without first making sure the Patriot Act doesn't have the ability to make any American acquire that status for any reason the President wants?  It couldn't be the American citizens, could it?  You would support making sure terrorists don't get trials while the Patriot Act claims you can be declared one for any reason the most failing president in US history wants??

113.  How come treason then constantly insists they can torture and do anything they want with any "terrorist" WHILE MAKING SURE THEY AVOID EXPLAINING TO THE PEOPLE HOW THE PERSON WHO IS A TERRORIST GOT THAT STATUS?  If there is to be no trials, how did the terrorist become a terrorist?

Because of corporate treason, as the Antichrist grows stronger, people with much experience in politics will be making "mistakes" so bad, it would be better to elect the inexperienced who even earn minimum wage! IF YOU CAN IMPEACH THESE AND THE ENTIRE CONGRESS BOTH DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, [Independents too!] THEN, AND ONLY THEN, CAN PRESIDENT BUSH BE IMPEACHED!

Treason of the Supreme Court, the United Nations, and Congress

114. Why didn't the Supreme Court realize that "Conspiracy Theorists" would have allowed an election recount if votes are not sure instead of becoming paranoid and stopping a recount and then sending propaganda periodicals to tell us that Bush would have won anyway?

115. Why did the Supreme Court finally realize that President Bush overstepped his authority at Guantanamo Bay acquired through failing to protect the American people, when even multitudes of mentally retarded folk figured that out a long time ago?  Is one requirement for the High Court to have bad reflexes?

116. Why does the Supreme Court, realizing the many unprecedented mistakes of President Bush to even the embarrassing starting of an illegal war in paranoia, looking for invisible WMDs to the taking of multitudes of lives, still struggle to maintain the right to make him a dictator and give the whole farm over to him?

117. How come the Supreme Court and Congress cannot understand that Bush has a talent to give inaccurate information to billions of people?  Why then would they want to empower him to destroy a person merely by making an accusation considering the accuracy of much of what he says?  He doesn't make "mistakes?"  Why then forbid any of his victims under accusation to prove he has made any?

119. Do members of the High Court and Congress know that the "Conspiracy Theorists" would have gotten rid of any government official who has a talent of giving inaccurate information a long time ago, and that promises, government aspirations and records cannot survive if one in the highest office is proud to habitually give inaccurate information to the globe?

120. Why didn't the High Court nor Congress consider it strange that Bush actually proudly showed pictures of 911 for his re-election campaign since Bush failed to protect the American people on that fateful day?  Is this action supposed to communicate the same kind of grief Bush showed when he stood up on the pulpit of 911, and with tears stated that he will destroy all evil and that all who are not with us are with the terrorists? 

121. Why didn't the High Court nor Congress consider it strange that a president would claim the powers of a king for failing to protect the American people?  Would any future president claiming credit for protecting America be condemned?

122. Who would think there is a conspiracy and why would our national leaders hyperventilate because Americans at least believe there is a global one when the country saw only one politician voted against the institution of the Patriot Act after 911, and then only because HE READ THE PROPOSALS FIRST???

123. Why did the Democrats fail to mention all during the 2006 campaign that "impeachment is off the table," and that they would rather work with the problem (Bush) instead?

124. Why did they claim they will not "take revenge" on President Bush, giving a precedent where it would be prudent for American government to release all prisoners in jail because it was unbecoming of the government to "take revenge" on them?

125. Why were the Democrats so eager to betray the American people, till they couldn't even wait till they sat in their seats of power, but unleashed that they would not impeach president Bush just after the election results?

126.  Why did House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, on July 17, 2008, call President Bush a "total failure" in his presidency, after heading a Congress that constantly gave him everything he wanted not since day one, BUT EVEN BEFORE DAY ONE?  [Before they even sat in power, just after the elections of 2006, the newly elected Democratic Congress suddenly started to say that they will not impeach President Bush, but would work with him.  This shocking news they avoided to let the people know during the entire campaign for their election.  Since that shocking announcement, they kept that promise better than any other they had made.  Why therefore does Nancy Pelosi claim President Bush is a failure when President Bush SUCCEEDED almost 100% in getting them to do what he wants?]

127. Why did the Democrats suddenly acquire the reasoning of President Bush after they were elected to finally check him, and began to say that they could not defund the war and therefore leave our soldiers out there ill-equipped?  If even janitors were elected to de-fund the war and then kept their campaign promises, would they then leave the troops out there after the war is defunded?  INSANITY!

128. Why did Al Gore willingly concede defeat to the 2000 elections that were wrested from him, and then now urges that President Bush must not be impeached because trying to do so would not be successful?  Why has John Kerry done the same? (This great nation came into being by humble people who saw no true means of succeeding the vast job of creating it, but claimed it was the right thing to do anyway and moved ahead undaunted!)

NANCY PELOSI:  "Bush, you are a FAILURE as a president!  At least you got everything you wanted from me 100% of the time even against the wishes of the American people!  It's a good thing you didn't ask me for any other favors!"

129. Why then don't the American people understand that Bush cannot be impeached without the same being done to the High Court Justices, Republican members of Congress and most Democratic members of Congress?

130. Why do members of the other branches of government constantly claim that Bush can't be impeached because he is too powerful?  Why can't the American people teach them that it is their job description to check the executive branch of government to make sure he doesn't get "too powerful" so they can get a good job approval rating that justifies their high salaries?  Would they be willing to change the requirements for office, step aside and hire janitors to do what they are supposed to?  Would the janitors fail?

131. If we consider that, for some strange reason, we have been rather free of terror attacks before Bush, could it be because terrorists had something to fear because of all the other presidents before Bush?

132. What then could have ended the fear terrorists had of American presidents when Bush came besides Bush's strong efforts to sell our ports over to the United Arab Emirates who financed 911?

133. How come because of Bush's failure to protect the American people, all the American people are automatic suspects to terrorism when he is the only person most Americans know of who has actual family ties to terrorists?  [The Bin Laden family and the Saudis.]

134. If Russia suddenly attacked and destroyed Canada (hypothetically) on our borders because they thought Canada had WMDs, and after finding they were wrong, did not blush but remained as an occupying power, should America arm itself?  Should America meddle?  Why is it that the High Court, Congress and the United Nations can't understand that Iran has a right to do this?  Do you think America should meddle or arm herself if Russia destroyed Canada?  Why does the High Court, Congress and the United Nations still believe there is no consequence for starting a false war of aggression after insulting and ignoring massive forces that struggled to stop them from making the mistake?  How come we never heard much about this situation with Iran's nuclear program before the Constitutionally illegal Iraq War?

135. Why is the Bush Administration covering up the destruction of CIA tapes documenting aggressive interrogation techniques by the government against suspected terrorists?

136. The government said they had to destroy the tapes, or else the identities of the interrogators could become known and they could be jeopardized.  Would that then make these interrogators acquire the status of Valerie Plame?  [She was the woman who was a CIA operative whose identity was compromised by the Bush Administration.  Her husband was critical of the Bush Administration.]

137. Should we interrupt Osama having Thanksgiving dinner to ask him whether he feels President Bush has been a great success in American security?  If not, then how about next Thanksgiving?

138. Besides the Third Reich, is there another regime that would start wars in order to "save innocent lives" and then take much more innocent lives?

139. What is the secret to Bush's very strong desire to "save innocent lives" all over the world?  If you were able to acquire his Skull & Bones insignia, would you then acquire the same desire to start wars to save innocent lives?  [It's the same insignia the Nazis war on their uniforms].

A MESSAGE FROM THE THIRD REICH!... "BIG DEAL!  We also used war to save innocent lives and took much more than our enemies we had to stop, Mr. Bush!  You ain't got nothin' on us!"

140. Since Saddam was ruthless and took much innocent life, what happened to the scorecards and statistics of innocent lives being lost after Bush decided to walk in the steps of Nazis?  What percent reduction of lives lost did we gain?

141.  If ghosts are real, why do they always forget to haunt people of the likes of Ted Bundy, Osama Bin Laden, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin or George Bush and the Congress?

142. How come, with all of this, those who still insist we must not know there is a conspiracy, struggle to make sure that these clearly treasonous activities escalate day after day after day?
 

The Invalidity of the 911 Independent Investigations

144. Why do such expect us to believe that under the weight of 3,000 graves, the president who failed to protect them can refuse to testify cleanly under oath at the investigation that took place so much later, and wound up finally testifying not under oath, but at the same time with the second most honest person in the world (Dick Cheney) does not give fuel to the big bad ol' "conspiracy theorists?" Just the weight of 3,000 graves would force any American to testify trembling, let alone their protector supposed to give them protection they paid high taxes for!

The Cost of Energy Tripled Since the Bush Administration

145. Why, since the Bush Administration, did fuel prices uniquely get so high and the American people can't figure out why, even though Bush struggled to sell our ports over to the United Arab Emirates who were involved in financing 911?  Why can't even fuel prices regularly falling only at election time, convince certain people that a certain person bears heavy responsibility?

146. Supply, demand, developing China, developing India, offshore oil drilling restrictions, weak dollar, record fuel prices quadrupled that lowers every time Bush is in elections:  Only one of these things came after Bush became president.  Can you figure out which?  Why did supply, demand, China, India, offshore oil drilling restrictions and a weak dollar wait for Bush to arrive to produce record fuel prices quadrupled?

147. Who would make the American people vote for an oilman for president and then have no idea why fuel prices would triple above all history?

The South American Country of Paraquay

148. Why did President Bush become the only American president to have an interest in and buy thousands of acres of land in the South American country of Paraquay?  [That country is famous for granting asylum to war criminals and Nazis.  Even Bush's daughters are learning to speak Spanish over there!]

149.  Why doesn't Bush know that country is famous for harboring Nazi war criminals and therefore put that country on his hitlist for the Global War on Terror?

150.  Why, before buying land in the South American country of Paraguay, did Bush first secure an agreement that he and heavily armed soldiers with him be not tried for war crimes?  Why no desire to clear his name?  If he knows already that he's a war criminal, why can't his propagandists figure it out?