THE IDEAS AND THOUGHTS ON THIS WEBSITE WILL
ONE DAY BECOME SO BIG, EVEN THE NEW WORLD ORDER AND ALL THE
MILITARIES IN THE WORLD WILL NOT BE ABLE TO CONTAIN THEM!
FINAL PROOF POSITIVE
THAT THE IRAQ WAR WAS PURE TREASON!
Are we still trying to stop Iran from acquiring the
ability to send "mushroom clouds" half way around
the world to threaten America? Why then did we
attack defeated Iraq with contained Saddam who was
contained under no-fly-zones to stop his "mushroom
clouds" and ignore Iran that was not defeated nor
contained all that time? Why was defeated
Saddam, contained under no-fly-zones, more able to
acquire WMDs for "mushroom clouds" much faster than
Iran? Iran isn't able to attack us with
"mushroom clouds even yet?? Why then did our
sons and daughters in the military die? Can
you understand why the federal government has
detention camps ready for us?
THE LIVES OF YOUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS IN THE MILITARY
WERE DESTROYED FOR THIS!
George Galloway documents that
America has been selling and shipping Iraq's oil to wheresoever
she pleased.
Reply: "If that is so, why then
are gas prices still so high over here?"
Because Iraq was destroyed and her
oil stolen not for the benefit of America, BUT FOR
THE NEW WORLD ORDER. Iraq will get back at all
of you for your complacency: THAT OIL WILL BE
USED TO RUN MACHINERY THAT WILL ENFORCE TYRANNY
AGAINST YOU and destroy many of you.
150 QUESTIONS THAT SAVE LIVES JUST BELOW
HERE!
Tommy Thompson of Homeland Securty just after 911:
"I don't know why the
terrorists don't poison the American food supply,
since it's such an easy thing to do."
The year 2001 was the absolute first time we
ever witnessed words like these ALL OUR LIVES!
Were you smart enough to ask these
people why even your grandparents never told you how easy it
was for terrorists to poison the American food supply, then
with an explanation for why they didn't do it before and
even now? When they tell
you how many hundreds of attacks were defeated because of
the unjust principles in the Patriot Act since 911, did you
ask them how many attacks were defeated before late 2001
when the Patriot Act was installed? Are we, your "conspiracy
theorists" really that dumb as you think, readers?
Tommy Thompson should be jailed on death row,
and told, with all his comrades who put us in this fear-mongering
atmosphere to explain even why we can claim that the Patriot Act
allowed us to stop "hundreds of attacks against America" without
explaining how we were able to stop so many attacks before 2001 when
the Patriot Act was established and GW Bush
was appointed president. All of them should
be told to explain clearly why things are this way before execution
time approaches.
[This indicates they know something about some
tragic future that will destroy more lives than all the
deaths in Iraq and are involved in that
future. THE FACTOR THAT CAUSED ALL THE PROBLEMS AND
PERPLEXITY AMERICA NEVER HAD TO WORRY ABOUT BEFORE IS INSIDE AMERICA
AS OPPOSED TO OUTSIDE. That is the difference between former
days, today, and the much more horrible future.]
Muhammed "Stupid"
Terrorists: Muslim extremists are even today yelling: "WE WILL BREAK AMERICA!"
Reply: "YOU'RE TOO LATE, HOLMES! You don't listen to the
News?"
US Government leaders:
"AMERICA IS BROKEN!"
Death gift for our fallen soldiers, home-coming gift for those to come back!
"Let's Look Forward!"
They're not going to remember how hard nor how often these
non-Muslims in Washington were warned not to
pursue their insanity.
FASCISM LURKS WITHIN! Ways to know
that fascism now dominates America:
1.
Distrust of Government causes gunman to go on a rampage.
Article talking about a gunman who doesn't trust the government and all the
trouble he has caused. Many
articles, posts and publications like this indicates the
domination of fascism in America. They're still saying that "America is BROKEN,"
but we come to see that no gunman, NOR ALL OF THEM TOGETHER, ever were able
to BREAK America. How does a fascist think?
A fascist can see and whine about distrust of
government, but a fascist cannot even ask how to gain trust back, nor even
publicly inquire about how bad distrust of government is by the people.
Only one gunman distrusts it?
Gunmen are the only ones who distrust the government? Are they curious
to find the extent of this distrust?
HOW BADLY DO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
MISTRUST THE GOVERNMENT?
How badly do even the Democrats in Washington take the
news that they are the most distrusted bunch of party-members in all
American history? Since this shooting, are they concerned about
mistrust now
and are ready to build more detention camps to deal
with those who distrust it?
IF THE GOVERNMENT JAILS ALL GUNMEN,
WILL THEY GET RID OF GOVERNMENT DISTRUST?
The wars were based on "GLOBAL DEMOCRACY" or leaders
listening to their people all over the world and valuing their approval.
Our sons and daughters in the military died for this. How come the
government has since continued showing us that they don't even care if they
are hated by the people? What caused the
distrust? Why don't they ask? Can they publicly inquire?
To do all this IS TO CEASE THE PERSISTENT ACTS THAT CAUSE DISTRUST.
That's why they never ask, and never stop the acts that cause distrust.
Are they intelligent enough to know what would cause distrust and stop doing
it? Fascists can't.
2.
The flood of persistent publications that talk
about "our" CIA interrogators or anyone else who tortured or consented to
the torture of people with fascist precision, BUT THAT WHICH ONLY LAMENT
THAT THEIR TORTURE ORGIES WERE EXPOSED AND NOT KEPT SECRET. They keep hounding
the lie that fascist CIA torturers have kept us safe since 2001, but even
the fascist propagandists on the internet REFUSE to answer how America was
protected before these fascist interrogators became so bold. All those
who write such articles from the news media or elsewhere are fascists.
So I
guess President Obama already knows the people who warned him
against his insane Bush bailouts were correct after all! Why
then doesn't he admit it to us in another more timely and open way?
Illegal aliens don't seem to have to worry about these "centers."
So cheer up! Remember: They told you your sons and
daughters in the military were dying, "FOR YOUR FREEDOMS."
3. The flood of persistent articles and opinions
which tell us that free and open trials to "TERRORISTS" is a luxury America
cannot afford. These are also fascists who forget to alert the
American people to the fact that the Patriot Act says they can gain that
terrorist status for any reason and would then be prohibited from proving
that the distrusted government makes mistakes and prove their innocence.
Brave people should never fear free and open
trials. The worst individuals should be freely and openly tried.
We are not afraid of this. What is there to fear? If the person
is dangerous, he would be convicted and punished, and all the world would
see the fairness of America confirmed. Why would people fear this?
Why did fascist regimes always fear this? Any guess? That is
because they're fascists. These same fascists mock us because we fear
black helicopters. They fear no-fly-zones, and yet our fear of black
helicopters didn't BREAK America.
4. The constant references to Abraham
Lincoln once suspending Habeas Corpus to deal with an emergency in his day
to excuse their hidden lust for eliminating Habeas Corpus altogether.
All this on top of President Obama telling us we must not look backward, but
forward. Do they want to UPDATE our terror policies by going back to
the 1978 FISA laws they told us were outdated? Why then look back to
Lincoln? They persistently parade the mistakes of the past so they can
perpetuate them permanently. Even our internment of 110,000 Japanese
during WWII forced President Reagan to apologize for the mistakes of the
past while Reagan himself then at least allowed more Rex84 detention camps
to be built.
Since Lincoln, was anyone able to say,
"You know it's been six years since our last terror attack, let's kick out
that provision of Habeas Corpus again?" Why were there not
much more attacks since Lincoln? Because they didn't have cellphones
back then? When were cellphones invented? Lincoln's mistake
was stopped and supposed to have been used as public historical record of
paths we must never take. Yes, even good Presidents can make mistakes.
All provisions like the elimination of Habeas Corpus puts government
leaders above the people and makes them immune from justice. PEOPLE
WHO LIKE THESE FASCIST CODES NATURALLY CAN SEE THEY WOULD NEVER BE VICTIMS
OF THEM. That's because they would get the power to arbitrarily judge and forbid anyone
from reviewing their actions nor proving innocence against their
accusations.
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THOSE WHO CREATE LAWS
THAT WOULD MAKE THEM HAVE THE POWERS OF DICTATORS IN THE EVENT OF A MAJOR
CATASTOPHE MIGHT BE SOMEWHAT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CATASTROPHES?
150 QUESTIONS THAT SAVE LIVES
JUST BELOW HERE! A MAJOR TEST OF THE INTELLIGENCE OF
THE FREE GLOBAL POPULATION!
"CONSPIRACY THEORISTS"
COULDN'T STOP GIGGLING OVER SADDAM PLAYING WITH HIS
RUBBER-DUCKY IN NO-FLY-ZONES! THE ONES WHO LAUGHED AT US FOR
FEARING BLACK HELICOPTERS WERE TERRIFIED AT THE SIGHT AND
DEMANDED THAT WE KILLED OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS [not theirs]
TO ADDRESS THAT GREAT CONSPIRACY THEORY GOING ON OVER THERE BEHIND
THE NO-FLY-ZONES!
Be
vewey, vewey, qwiet! I'm hunting no-fwy-zones!
huh-huh-huh-huh-huh-huh-huh-huh-huh
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/iqexhibits.htm In a typical even high school classroom in 1943,
if we were asked what kind of a person would claim arrests without
charge, indefinite detention, no due process nor rights to prove
innocence and even torture are necessary for security, we would
instantly reply that such a person is either a communist or a Nazi
and that he hates the Constitution of the United States and our
soldiers. We were told that our reply was
correct.
In a typical high school
classroom in 1970, if we were asked the same question, viewing that
the Nazi regime was destroyed in 1945, we replied that the person is
a communist and naturally hates the Constitution of the United
States and our soldiers. We were
also told then that our reply was correct.
We now don't know what to say
since the year 2001, EXCEPT THAT WE'RE GLAD WE'RE
"CONSPIRACY THEORISTS!"
Now 150 Questions That Save Lives! New
questions or changes in blue.
02/21/2010
By Susan Williams
MARTIAL LAW IS COMING TO AMERICA!
MARTIAL LAW IS ONLY NECESSARY WHEN INJUSTICE IS NECESSARY TO COMBAT
CATASTROPHES. INJUSTICE IS NEVER NECESSARY FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER!
IN A TIME OF CHAOS OR CRISIS IS WHEN JUSTICE IS MORE NEEDED THAN EVER BEFORE
THAN WHEN THERE IS PEACE AND PROSPERITY. THE TIME TO IMITATE THE POLICIES
OF AMERICAS WORST MOST BRUTAL ENEMIES OF THE COMMUNIST AND NAZI REGIMES IS AFTER
WE LONG ADMIT TO OURSELVES THAT WE HAVE ALREADY CONVERTED TO THEM AND ARE
WILLING TO GO BACK INTO HISTORY AND PLAY IT OUT THAT WE ARE UPDATING OURSELVES!
"'Preventive
war' was an invention of Hitler. Frankly I would not even listen to anyone
seriously that came and talked about such a thing." -- President Dwight D. Eisenhower
The same propagandists
who told us we must not wait for countries to do wrong things,
but must pre-emptively strike countries like Iraq before we wind
up being sorry, constantly ask us to relate one single person
who was ever harmed by the Patriot Act as proof that such codes
for security are harmless to freedom or a free people.
They tell us we must first witness tragedy before we work to
dismantle the Patriot Act.
THE MILITARY PAGES
ARE REPAIRED <<You must wait for those
pages to download into your browser>>!
TRAITOROUS SOLDIERS IN OUR MILITARY ON THE
MILITARY FORUMS, ONE OF WHICH RESPONSIBLE FOR "PURGING" OUT LOYAL
CONSTITUTIONAL SOLDIERS, SPEAKS! http://www.TheirSecrets.info/03martial_law2.htm,
PLEASE WAIT AS THE PAGE DOWNLOADS! Tmac1238 (ME):
No suspension of
the Constitution is ever necessary for any form of real security. That
is the real myth, and not the reality that there is a global conspiracy.
That's why treason can see people
believing in their conspiracy, but frequently dance over statements made
by the American forefathers which say in essence, "He who would agree to
surrender a measure of his liberties for security, deserves neither
liberty nor security." That's because he's too plain stupid.
To ever justify a suspension of the
Constitution for any reason, justifies being like our proverbial
enemies, the Communists and Nazis. There is never a time such a
condition will be necessary, just like Bush's vacationing is just one
proof the Patriot Act he claims is "vital" is not necessary.
Remember that we caught Saddam Hussein
and had him in our hands. It was there proven how the Patriot Act and
torture are not necessary. Bush forgot to use them against Saddam to
even reveal where he shipped his elusive WMDs to.
BrandonKnight (Traitorous Soldier):
You know with all of what you say, you'll be one of the first to get
carted off in the middle of the night. Are you sure this is treason. Are
you sure you should be speaking out loud about things you have no real
knowledge about?
[Bush spoke out
loud about WMDs and the terrors of defeated dictators in
No-Fly-Zones! Did he have real knowledge about those things?
What did a lack of real knowledge about these things cost America and
the world?]
I hope you are ready for
the storm that
is coming, when people like me have to rid America of all of it's
domestic enemies. Treason, treason, treason. Some of us are ready to see
our country
>
[OUR COUNTRY?
WHOSE COUNTRY IS THAT? THE MILITARY'S?? THAT'S MARTIAL
LAW!!
He means the NEW WORLD ORDER.]
into the future with out any one to hinder the process....
I will leave the corpses of those that do
not comply in the open to decay.
I hope you have a lo
[alot or a
great deal] of ammo, I know
the military does, and has the ability to take all of the commercial/shlef
[shelf]
bought lot when the word comes.
Tmac1238:
Ah excuse me!!! You guys said, let's make war
in Iraq, let's order our security principles like the Communists AND
THEN WE'LL MAINTAIN OUR FREEDOMS! How then can you suggest that even I,
freely disagreeing can get carted off into the night? Are you giving
something away?
How could I get harmed
or carted off to anywhere when our Bad Boys are dying to preserve our
freedoms even to disagree? If anyone can still be carted off anyway, who
even votes against George Bush, why are our Bad Boys dying? Often
you guys give yourselves away!
You should face it, our government, to
include the President, George W. Bush, is the best thing since sliced
bread. They are working every day and night to make sure that you are
safe and sound when you lay your little, or big head down to go to
sleep. [He
must mean while taking more vacations than any other president of
American history! HE HAS MADE THESE
WORDS INTO A JOKE IN ORDER TO SHIELD HIS
TREASON. HE ISN'T ACTUALLY PLAYING
HERE. THERE ARE JUST CERTAIN
THINGS YOU DON'T JOKE ABOUT, LIKE A MAN
WHO JOKED ABOUT A BOMB IN AN AIRPORT.
WHAT THIS GUY IS PRETENDING TO JOKE
ABOUT IS MUCH, MUCH MORE SERIOUS AFTER
AMERICA IS BANKRUPTED WAGING WARS TO
"DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS." SOLDIERS
WHO HAVE ROOM TO JOKE LIKE THAT MUST BE
CONFIDENT THAT THEY WON'T FACE DEATH IN
THESE WARS.
We asked all the propagandists to
show us their posts in concern for terror before Bush came and they
still can't understand the most simple of questions
or requests. That is because,
like their ancestors in the Inquisitions, the Communist Regimes and the
Nazi regime, they keep spending too much time mentally diagnosing
humans.]
If it wasn't for our awesome president,
we would have been over run by Al'Qaida some time ago. They have
put in place the best of measures EVER, to insure that there is not a
chance that these guys can get to us.
[Notice that GW Bush entered office in 2001.
How did America survive Al Qaeda all these
years before Bush was appointed into office?
Al Qaeda would have taken over America if
not for GW Bush? When was Al Qaeda
formed, and why would they even wait till
Bush became president to think to attack
America? Would you like to interview
Osama Bin Laden to find out? He's
still living comfortably, you know.]
Thank goodness for the Patriot Act. I
feel safer everyday that I wake up. I have no reason to doubt our
great leader, Emperor, oops, President Bush. I am ready to take action
against those that are not good citizens, and lawful Republicans.
[RULE OF THUMB:
If you institute laws for security that were already adopted and
practiced by the Communists and Nazis, no one should wonder why
Communists and Nazis among us would feel safer to live here!]
Tmac1238:
Awww man! How long
was Al Qaedda around? How did we survive all these years when you were
in anxiety clinics for terror till Bush came? Constitutional and sane
human beings were not in anxiety clinics for terror till Bush came in
2001! Now humans are going into anxiety clinics for terror after Bush
came. Monsters are coming out when Bush came because they can't stand
Constitutional liberty.
Can you please explain--I mean dodge
around this--again? Did you ask Batman and Robin how they coped
against terrorism in Gotham City? How did Bert and Ernie of Sesame
street survive this long with Al Qaedda around? Where did you guys
get all this propaganda nonsense? You attended Osama's thanksgiving
dinner party last year?
When was it suddenly accepted that
Communist and Nazi security principle in the Patriot Act became the best
measures ever for security, and why do you fail to plainly and audibly
give them credit for being lightbearers in security? When did you figure
out that the measures the Communists and Nazis took for security were
the best measures and best form of government ever?
[WITHOUT BEING ONE!]
NEW!! IQ TESTERS!
Updated
11/4/2008
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/iqexhibits.htm This first of two pages gives major tests of the intelligence of
the American people and the rest of the global population as it relates
to the political revolutions that are taking place all around them! The scriptures tell us that just before Jesus comes the global
population will suffer a serious intelligence problem. Let's see
if that is true!
WHO ARE OUR ENEMIES, THIS TIME!! Enemies which caused
America to beat the war drums and become concerned about security, came
and went!! What happened to them when America beat them in
conflict AND WHEN SHE DID NOT??
NEW!!
THE CHURCH IS ONE! How is it and why is it that Jesus Christ
Himself couldn't understand that THE CHURCH IS ONE??
1. Besides hearing a deafening roar of laughter more
thunderous than all our nuclear devices exploding at once, why won't Bush
and his propagandists urge Russia, with her pristine military, to defend her
new-found freedoms in Iraq?
While
the American military is being taxed all over
the world refusing to mind her own business, the
Communist militaries have been largely at rest
and in training to attack us. Russia,
which recently claimed freedom and sees that she
doesn't have to mind everybody else's business
to maintain her freedoms, obviously doesn't see
the need to
find enemies everywhere and then
chant how "freedom ain't free."
2
. Russia - The United States!
One of these nations is stupid and the other isn't. One of these
nations would defend her freedoms in Iraq and the other wouldn't. Is
the one who would defend her freedoms in Iraq stupid or not?
3
. Why would President Bush know
that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are in the best interest of the United
States and freedom and liberty? Why then would Communist China also
know those wars are in the best interest of America and would be willing
literally to put themselves out to
fund it to the tune presently of 1.5 trillion dollars? When did
Communist China SUDDENLY have America's best interests at heart? Was
it when President Bush SUDDENLY had its best interests at heart?
4
. None of the Communist countries
are STUPID enough to fight for freedom in Iraq. WHY WOULD THEY BE
STUPID ENOUGH TO FUND BUSH'S WARS FOR "FREEDOM" TO THE TUNE OF
MORE THAN 1.5 TRILLION
DOLLARS WHEN FREEDOM OPPOSES THEIR REGIME CONCEPTS? Could it be they
know
that
the wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan are for the opposite??
5
. People keep assuming that President Bush is not
very bright. If that is so, why did he have the intelligence to know
that wars to destroy America and freedom requiring more than one and a half trillion
in funding cannot be financed by free countries?
6
. How come terrorists are not
thinking of attacking Russia? If they hate us because we're free, why
wouldn't they hate Russia even more? Note: All tyrannical
regimes and people would more hate and oppose their own members who betray
their cause against freedom over those who were always already free.
Consider also that Russia never directly involved herself in the quarrels
between Arab and Jew like the United States did outside of the directives of
the Constitution [or at least
not until America stepped in the conflict and was
partial].
7
. Why are the
loitering internet propagandists who tell us they
can't stand "conspiracy theories" constantly telling
us that America is being controlled by the Jews?
Was there another time in history when their fathers
realized that the Jews were also causing all the
problems during the 1930s and 1940s?
Who told them that the Jews
were controlling America? They heard that on
the news? If America is being controlled by
the Jews, why is America slipping back to the
principles of the Inquisitions and not to Jewish
Law? Why is Catholicism dominating the
personnel and policies of American government today
and that would convince many people that Jews are
taking over?
[There is global treason
going on, and indeed, many Jews are involved.
Members of every race, religion, affiliation and
position are involved. Focus on the Jews
specifically as being the cause however, is still
merely a diversion and smokescreen.]
8
. General Patraeus and his
supporters are incensed that people would call him General "Betrayus"
claiming he's a traitor to America. Can we find out if this is true if
his very kids know that the wars now staged for "democracy" have been voted
down by the American people and they still continue? Was the American
vote these wars being staged to protect in "democracy" betrayed?
9
. Bush said in May 2008:
"Popularity is fleeting. Principles are forever." How long then
will it take even Harvard, Yale, Georgetown and Princeton to understand that
wars for "Global Democracy"...
are lies?
10.
Why would Bush finally flip-flop and tell us the Iraq War situation is
similar to what happened in Vietnam and we therefore can't pull out?
Did we have to attack the Vietcong and start the Vietnam war because they
were already defeated and were in no-fly-zones like Saddam was?
11
. Since war-mongers also told us before the Vietnam
war, that we had to fight the enemy there or fight them here, and that we
have to fight that war in order to "defend our freedoms" just like today,
how did we cope with enemies here in our land and tyranny all these years
after we lost that war
and pulled out?
People have said that the
Vietnamese, though communists, agreed not to "follow
us home" after we lost the Vietnam war, but that Al
Qaedda has promised to follow us home if we lose the
war in Iraq
(against the already defeated dictator). If they hated us because we were
free, why would they come to these decisions at the
beginning of the 21st century? Were Muslim
extremists born
yesterday?
in the 21st century? Why do so
many things that never seemed to bother a great
country now are on the news?
[As it turns out, Muslim
terrorists are not destroying America nor its
freedoms. Washington is.]
12
. If we pulled out of Iraq now, is
it true terrorists would use Iraq, half way around the world, to attack us
here, instead of some alternative place closer?
You mean this was proven by terrorists using oil-rich Iran to attack us from
there?
In other
words, if there is so much free space over in Iran
where terrorists can attack us, why are they
ignoring that free space to attack America's
military in Iraq?
Does anyone understand that oil-rich Iran is
almost 4 times larger than Iraq?? You mean we were terrorized by Iran
all these years and didn't know it??
They're saying that if we pulled out
of Iraq even before, it would be taken over by terrorists and become an
oil-rich terrorist nation like Iran. IT WOULD THEN ATTACK US LIKE IRAN
ALWAYS HAS BEEN!
George Galloway
interviews a typical PERSISTENT propagandist and shows the
truth about the threat Iran has always has been to America!
He reveals that Iran has never been
the aggressor nor attacked another nation for 300 years!
13. Why does
the free world believe that Middle Eastern Muslim
terrorists are now so awesome? After all these
decades when their most hateful threats were laughed
at? Are they so awesome that we have to trash
the Constitution of the United States and create FEMA concentration camps and Martial Law scenarios?
If that is true, how come, at the same time with
these emergency plans and procedures long in effect
before even the 911 attacks, can the terrorists not
even interrupt the golf games of our national
leaders?
[Which should be
trashed first: golf games? or the Constitution of the United
States? Is this a hard decision for a fascist?
Middle
Eastern Muslim terrorists are only just as awesome
as is their connection to American leadership.
Even Muslims should question why Osama Bin Laden has
had a long relationship with former President George
Bush. If these terrorists are so awesome, they
would have aim good enough to put the leaders who
even order wars for the shedding of Arab and Muslim blood in
their rifle scopes--NOT the people of America
struggling--even by vote--to stop them from shedding
that blood.
Our national
leaders freely move about in the open air as if they
know that the awesome terrorists would much rather
attack the American citizens than they.
Is it true
that these new and awesome terrorists that are
scaring the daylights out of American leadership are
really that awesome? Is it true they are
struggling to at least capture the fear and the
ATTENTION of our national leaders? or do you think
they would much better attract the attention of our
national leaders IF THEY CONCENTRATED ON KILLING
THEM INSTEAD OF EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING ELSE?
The way
things are going now is the way those destroying
America want it to. They are engineering
things so that America will fall in a very SUDDEN
way--a way that will catch us like flies in a
situation that we then cannot control and that will
destroy us.
Even in
American business, our lives, working in offices are
at times interrupted by alarms. At the sounds
of those alarms we are to stop what we are doing and
walk out of the offices in an orderly manner.
Those alarms are called, FIRE DRILLS. Instead
of this, the government of the United States is, in
secret, preparing for the collapsing of America with
an after response of terror by constructing a
death-engine government.
THESE ARE
RATHER SECRET PROCEEDINGS! Unlike fire drills,
the general public are not active participants so
that they themselves can witness the active paranoia
from the people who long schooled them against
paranoia. Again THE ISSUE OF SECRECY.
Since the Bush
Administration they have been ranting persistently
in a fascist manner that America must respond to
terror by inheriting at least some of the
characteristics of terrorists with their security
policies. That includes
SECRECY
and making violent wars against terrorists to the
killing of many innocents and then smiling away that
responsibility under the idea that the only real way
for security would involve COLLATERAL DAMAGE: in
other words, terrorist language.]
1. Our politicians, being members of Skull and
Bones, suddenly desired to protect innocent life.
They then went to Iraq and took much more innocent
lives than Saddam Hussein ever could at that time!
THE SKULL AND BONES SYMBOL ACCURATELY PREDICTED THE
RESULT.
2. The ATF attacked the women and children at
WACO using humvees and tanks not being able to
tolerate the fact that the local police there were
competent to handle that situation. They shone
bright lights and interrupted the sleep of the
Branch Davidians by playing loud noises of dying
animals crying. THAT EVENT ALSO ACCURATELY
PREDICTED THE TRAGEDY THAT WOULD FOLLOW. The
inmates already got a sign of what would happen to
them in the near future. After the raid, many
of the comments of ATF officials to address the
concerns of American citizens about that unnecessary
event featured the word... "PARANOID!"
3. Now the American people face all kinds of unjust laws.
They are constantly being told about so many things they
never had to worry about before like bio terror, food and
water poisoning, nuclear terror and many and other things.
Along with that, there is a strange closure and revamping of
large facilities that are somehow compatible with the unjust
laws that are being created all the time.
CAN AMERICA NOW TAKE A HINT ONCE MORE?
14
. America
is now using torture against what they claim are
terror suspects and detainees in order to gain
valuable information that "can save innocent lives,"
while on the books of law in America it clearly
states that any American citizen can gain that
status. If that is so, why are the FEDS so
willing to torture so many people, suspects, and
even potential suicide bombers, and not former
president GW Bush?
BUSH SHOULD KNOW MORE ABOUT TERRORISM AND AL QAEDDA
THAN ANY TERRORISM SUSPECT!
Why, you
say?
Well, which detainee or terror suspect--or even
suicide bomber--can say...
"I
got rich(er) right along with Osama Bin Laden?"
15. If government leaders manage to
create laws that would give them the powers of dictators if a terrible
emergency or crisis comes, why is it only the "conspiracy theorists" will
know crises will definitely come despite their heroic efforts to stop them?
Why wouldn't anyone consider it insanity that,
despite the active efforts of terrorists to destroy
America, this country is actually being destroyed by
the people who started a war on terror and who
outwardly are struggling to preserve it?
Why would only they know that if these government leaders cannot preemptively
stop these crises before they arrive, they moreso would not be able to get
America out of the Martial Law that will contain the brutal
security principles America's worst enemies always
had?
IF AMERICA FALLS, WHO CAN
ACTIVELY AND ACTUALLY SAY THAT IT WAS OSAMA BIN
LADEN THAT BROUGHT IT DOWN??
16. Is there something about the accusation of
treason or sedition that the 2006 elections cannot solve? [Bush
propagandists shout out freely that all who oppose Bush are in treason or
sedition. America opposed Bush in the 2006 elections.]
17. Will the seriousness of the current terrorism
situation, which they tell us demands the reinterpretation of the
Constitution to what it had always opposed, convince President Bush that he
shouldn't be the number one vacationing president in American history?
[Obviously he knows the situation is at least well under his control.]
18. I arm you with guns just in case
the federal government of the United States becomes tyrannical and
dangerous. You reply: "You have lost it man! You're a conspiracy
theorist! You're a terrorist! Here, let me get you some help!"
I then make a proposition: Instead of that, I write a Second Amendment
to the Constitution of the United States to arm you with guns just in case
the federal government of the United States becomes tyrannical and
dangerous. You reply, "That's better! I see you're finally
coming round!"
MESSAGE: The American
forefathers were, "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS!" They knew there was a global
conspiracy. That's why they created the Second Amendment and made the
United States an "ISOLATIONIST" country.
What
if presidents George Washington to Abraham Lincoln hated
"isolationism" and decided to search the world for WMDs in
their day and correct even one country called Iraq back
then? Would America and freedom be around to this day?
America, much more rich and powerful than back then,
cataclysmically transformed from surplus to bankrupt status
in the space of a mere 8 years under Bush policy
JUST TO CORRECT ONE COUNTRY!
Do you understand that people who are
Americans at heart would realize the mistake?
Whatever the national forefathers
were, in terms of even honesty or their insistence that
America must not get involved with other countries, all you
need to know is that even back then, though much poorer,
none of them had to use the word, "BROKEN" to describe this
fair land.
None of them had to tell us that Middle Eastern Muslims hate
us because we are free. They built campfires and
celebrated thanksgiving instead of building detention camps
and making crusades against paranoia.
19. If we can't afford the inexperience of Obama
being president, just what was it we were "enjoying" all these 8 years
America?
Sitting idly by while 3 planes struck down
buildings in the United States.
Claiming dictator powers not because he stopped
3 planes from destroying lives, but because he didn't stop them, unlike
every other president that protected us and didn't claim such rewards.
Attacking an already defeated dictator looking
for invisible WMDs that were not there without a blush.
Allowing the person responsible for 911 to still
remain free.
Spending 7yrs trying to defeat the already
defeated dictator.
Destroying the American treasury profiteering
off of the wars against the defeated dictator.
Wasting the lives of generations of innocents in
a false war.
Having no solid protection for our troops in the
wars and wasting much precious time after being told about that fact.
Instituting security principles the Communists
and Nazis always used and calling it "The Patriot Act."
Causing supply, demand, developing China,
developing India and offshore drilling restrictions to FINALLY cause
fuel prices to leap to record highs and then
almost quadruple yet more.
Forcing America into recession
to the brink of depression
.
Many more such exploits by the Bush
Administration...
Question: Since it is said
that Barrack Obama doesn't have any experience to be
president, how much experience would anyone need to
emulate the accomplishments of President Bush?
Doesn't it make you personally sad that you would never
have the presidential experience of President Bush??
What about Adolf Hitler? Are you sorry you don't
have the guts to "never back down" like Bush? What
about Fidel Castro? Karl Marx?
The expression they use that
they are to never "waver" or "back down" is a subliminal
mental reservation
message to
each other and for the future, stating in effect that
even the clearly seen benefits of prosperity and wisdom
in liberty and freedom
as Americans
understand "freedom"
in contrast to their favored regimes of Communism and
Nazism going back even to the Inquisitions will not
deter them from doing whatever is possible to break it
down and restore the
Inquisitions. In all elections we saw with the
Bush family, they kept using the message that they never
"back down" or "waffle" as their major virtue.
That was also the major and only "virtue" seen in the
most brutal of dictators.
20. Bush propagandists are
scaring a sector of the Christian world by making it
look like Obama is fulfilling prophetic scripture by
playing the role of saving America and the world from an
imminent crisis. Why would they forget that Bush
claimed that same role after 911 (saying that he will
"destroy all evil" and that whosoever is "not with us, is
with the terrorists") and even directly claims that God
talks to him personally? If Obama is the
Antichrist by coming to save the United States and
global economy, why would it wind up being him saving
America from the reign of GW Bush?
21. Why wouldn't John McCain,
presumed to be a war hero who was tortured in battle on
behalf of the United States, not recognize the
principles of the Patriot Act, allowing secret trials,
detainment without evidence and torture, for what it is?
Don't be an IDIOT! No matter what, or no
matter what the hatred or anger, no Middle
Eastern Muslim extremist or all of them together
will ever get the power to put you here.
ONLY the most powerful government in the world
can put you here. It may well make its
borders loose also and illegal aliens may be the
best candidates to run these things.
22. Why is GW Bush the only
president in American history who constantly tells the
American people they are going to be attacked by
Middle-Eastern Muslim terrorists, even after horrible
security expenses like never before?
We already made an unspeakable sacrifice for security we
never made before since Bush! Why does he keep
telling us that notwithstanding, we will still be
attacked by terrorists?
23. If we are still going to be
attacked notwithstanding the American people
surrendering their liberties and the huge expense of
war, why not be given back their liberties, stop the war
and be attacked anyway?
24. Which person ever
said in amazement, "You know, it's been six full years
since our last terror attack!" before Bush became
president? Shouldn't even Nostradomorock have told
Fred Flintstone that an advancing age would come where
there would be no terror attacks for six years?
Why couldn't Abbott tell Costello about this? What
about Ricky Ricardo mentioning this to Lucy?
Batman could have made reference of this to Robin?
25. What didn't
our grandmothers tell us about their terrible struggle
and plight against terrorism before Bush? (All
conditions being equal: i.e. Middle Eastern Muslim men
were always around while we were yet free, etc.)
When did they approach and cry to you about the USS
Cole, WTC bombings, etc?
26.
Why doesn't anyone know nor remark about the fact
that the Communists and Nazis already had
the "tools" we now claim to need to keep America
safe: secret
trials, government snooping, "detainment" camps and
torture for their security principles and that we're
actually following them instead of teaching them the
blessings of freedom?
Which then would honor
them more: to stage a grand party in their honor
with swastika and sickle flags flying everywhere? or
institute the Patriot Act?
27. If the Communists
and Nazis always had a propaganda team with the secret
courts, secret trials, government snooping,
concentration camps and torture they always had, would
you be shocked if we have an actual vast propaganda team
even all over the internet as we copy all the other features the Communists and Nazis
always had?
28.
Why is it Bush propagandists on forums are telling us
that they now feel safer since Bush brought the Patriot
Act and is handling the terrorism situation for us, as
if they were in anxiety clinics for the entire history
of America till Bush came and transformed our security
principles and let them out? Why is all America
telling us the opposite: that they were basically safe
all throughout the history of America, enjoying baseball
and apple pie, till Bush came and made some of them now
have to attend anxiety clinics to deal with the new
problem? If we more
and more adopt the principles the Third Reich and
Communism always had, wouldn't communists and Nazis
among us feel safer to live here?
29. Why do strange people tell
us that the Patriot Act is a NEW set of laws that are
vital, knowing that this country existed with its entire
history without it except for when Bush and vast team
came along? Why did the Patriot Act only become so
vital during Bush's presidency?
WATERBOARDING!
The
men in the picture here are staging
demonstrations to PROVE the OLD technique used
by the fascist regimes and the Inquisitions
called waterboarding is torture. Why they
ever have to do this in a country called
America, is UNPRECEDENTED!
Mommy, is this torture?
"Presidential experience told us it is not, son!
I may use it on you when you hide information
from me. Better than giving you the rod
and being reported as a child-abuser!"
30. Why did America wait through
the entire lives of Lenin, Stalin, Engels, Hitler and
even Castro and never ventured to ask them whether or
not the "technique" of waterboarding is torture?
Shouldn't they consider that if they asked these brutal
dictators that question, they wouldn't be confused
today?
31. Why do the strange people
refuse to inform us that the principles of the Patriot
Act came right out of the Inquisitions of the Middle
Ages, and that they were also practiced for the entire
history of the Communists and Nazis? [They were
virtually never used for any time during the existence
of America, but those principles for "security" were
used every day in the history of the most brutal regimes
who were the worst enemies to America].
32. If vital information that
can save lives is so necessary America can now FOLLOW
behind the Communists and Nazis to torture to get it,
what good is it when those who claim they must torture
for it, can't assimilate the vital information THAT
SADDAM DIDN'T CAUSE 911, BUT OSAMA DID?
33. Why did Bush
choose to adopt principles of security from the
Inquisitions, the Communists and the Nazis in the
package of the Patriot Act in order to secure “peace”
and “freedom?” Was it because the Inquisitions,
Russia, Red China and the Third Reich already acquired
“peace” and “freedom?”
34. Why after the Patriot Act
was instituted to snoop the American people and true
Americans didn't like it, did strange people dare to ask
them if they have something to hide?
35. Why then, after Bush refused
to testify alone and under oath in an "independent
investigation" of the most major internal tragedy to
take place against the United States at least a year
after the fact, did they not pose the question to Bush
of whether or not he had anything to hide? [We
remind them to ask him even now, and they pretend we are
not asking them anything!]
36. Why do such people chide us,
asking us, "Do you see soldiers breaking down your
doors!" out of our concern against this old proposal,
The Patriot Act, but then staged all kinds of political
campaigns telling us that other countries must be
preemptively attacked before they commit crimes, showing
an abiding concept? Why did they commit even this
election fraud? They said we must not wait neither
for crimes nor tragedies to
take place before taking action as an abiding principle.
37. If I claim I am an illegal
alien, would I then become undocumented and be exempt
from the Patriot Act the American citizens are
unfortunate enough to be under? Does something
sound wrong with struggling to snoop and document
everything about the American people while struggling to
make the "undocumented" come here from Mexico or
anywhere else?
38. Why after 911, President
Bush didn't say, "Because of this attack against our
great nation we have to construct devices to snoop for
terrorists among the American people?" Why were
these devices already constructed?
Poster wrote: During the 1990's under President
Clinton, the National Security Agency monitored millions of private
phone calls placed by U.S. citizens and citizens of other countries
under a super secret program code-named Echelon.
On Friday, the New York Times suggested that the Bush administration
has instituted "a major shift in American intelligence-gathering
practices" when it "secretly authorized the National Security Agency
to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to
search for evidence of terrorist activity without [obtaining]
court-approved warrants."
But in fact, the NSA had been monitoring private domestic telephone
conversations on a much larger scale throughout the 1990s - all of
it done without a court order, let alone a catalyst like the 9/11
attacks.
Reply: THANK YOU!!
That is why all this business about eavesdropping to protect us was
always baloney! The government was always eavesdropping us and 911
took place anyway. Long before President Bush there were
arguments about the voracious appetite of the government into our
personal affairs, and they told us they can legally look into our
personal affairs. They have been doing it all along and 911
happened anyway. They then told us 911 mandates that they must
snoop on us.
But not watching your borders!
Would you need such "experience" to be
president?
39. Carnivore was introduced to
the American people in early 2000 under the tenure of
Bill Clinton [Carnivore is a supremely powerful internet
gathering tool that extracts all forms of data from the
internet and massively archives it]. Why didn't
Bush inform us that snooping devices were created under
Bill Clinton, but just accepted the transition from a
free country to "One Nation Under Surveillance" as
seamless as the fight to make sure the American people
don't realize there is a global conspiracy?
40. If these devices then were
constructed already, were they used before 911 to snoop
the American people? If they were not used, how
could the government have known that situations would
work out where they would be necessary, and yet
entirely missed the threat of 911? (Carnivore was
revealed to the American people almost two years
previous!) If they were used, how could 911 have
still taken place and our leaders still inform us that
surveillance IS NOW NECESSARY?
41. Should the United
States "surrender" its war and attack
against no-fly-zones
for WMDs and democracy and be embarrassed before the world?
Or should she finally win the war against a defeated and
contained dictator under no-fly-zones after
SEVEN years
and be embarrassed before the world?
[FASCISTS never blush.
The American citizenry and the global citizenry must
blush for them ONLY!]
42. If we started an horrific
war for democracy, why do Bush and his propagandists and
supporters refuse to tell us what was the message of the
last (2006) elections?
[The
message of the 2006 elections America gave the
government was to stop the wars and review the actions
of the warmongers who started them. The American
people therefore voted in the Democratic Congress who
promised them they would impeach President Bush but then
conspiratorially changed their minds just after the
election results showed they had won.]
43. Since Bush ignored the message of the last (2006)
elections while our troops are dying for "democracy,”
are they dying in vain?
44. What
will the world think of America if she "cowards out" from a
war started by brave people who got epileptic seizures by
watching a defeated and contained dictator playing with his
rubber-ducky in No-Fly-Zones?
45. "Conspiracy
Theorists" fear black helicopters. Others fear
no-fly-zones while constantly giving the "Conspiracy
Theorists" free mental diagnoses like their fathers
always did in detention (concentration) camps during the communist and
Nazi regimes. One of these fears has
destroyed America and caused you all the trouble all your
lives. One of these fears will still yet cost you much
more as detainment camps are built. Which of these
fears is your actual enemy?
46.
Haven't you noticed that President John F. Kennedy never
addressed that new "terror group" called "Conspiracy
Theorists?" That group didn't seem to bother him at
all! As a matter of fact the expression was never made
nor heard in my ears for most of my life! You mean we
lived with these very dangerous people who never caused us
any problem throughout the entire history of America??
Under which presidential tenure did this expression and this
paranoid concern skyrocket so?
47. The war
supporters love to call the anti-war people "cowards" to
continue the war of aggression. Of the nations called,
"The Axis of Evil," why did the brave war supporters choose
the weakest and only defeated nation to start a war with?
48. Upon choosing that weak and
defeated nation from among, "The Axis of Evil," how is it
the brave war supporters spent a tragic seven years, over a
trillion dollars, and wasted the lives of thousands of
generations of innocents in the process and have not
succeeded yet?
If
Iran
is one of the members of the "axis of evil," and is
not already defeated and "bombed into the Stone Age" as
Saddam was, why did the warmongers ignore her and choose to
attack Iraq? Was Saddam more able to acquire WMDs than
Iran?
This
rather prominent
person
is rather immortal! He's taken the lives of
over 4300 American servicemen, and put America into
a 1.5 trillion dollar debt to a Communist country
that never held America's best interest.
He has killed hundreds of thousands of innocent
Iraqis eradicating thousands of generations of human
beings in just a few years!
It may
be likely that any other country would waste their
time attacking another already defeated dictator.
Saddam Hussein (in the
picture above) was not a very good person either!
49. Why is it that the Bush
Administration is the only single regime that can be used as
public record statistics to show a measurement of the power
of already defeated dictators for future reference?
How is the world
to know already defeated dictators are invincible, unless
some nutjob attacks one?
50. Would the legacy
of the Bush administration compel you to go to mortuaries to
attack the corpses there so that you can be hailed as a
victorious warrior and acquire a massive adrenaline rush?
How long will it take you to understand that corpses in
mortuaries are invincible?
[Attacking a corpse is even less sane and advantageous than burning
ashes.]
51. How would Bush supporters
celebrate if we won this terrible 6 year struggle against an
already defeated dictator in new realms of
laughingstock-ism?
52. Will all the time, money, and
lives the Bush Administration put into fighting this false
war against a defeated and contained dictator, embolden the
terrorists?
53. Why after six years have the war
supporters not defeated the weakest and defeated nation of
the "Axis of Evil" Did their use of landfills and
Walter Reed Clinics against their own troops have something
to do with it?
54. Would you nominate President
Bush for a Nobel Peace Prize for shedding so much blood?
56. If you were
tired of wrestling for years with an old computer, wouldn't
it be refreshing to get an upgrade or a new one?
If
you were tired wrestling 7 years in a war against an already
defeated dictator, wouldn't it be refreshing to upgrade and
attack another nation that was not already defeated? (Iran?)
Iraq to America: "Hmmmm.
Ya had enough?? You love bankruptcy too?" America to Iraq: "NO! We're going to attack
Iran too! We were brave enough to attack you!"
How can we afford to
attack Iran in the face of the thought-police propagandists
all over the internet constantly posting how we're insane?
If we did that, wouldn't Iran become...
DEFEATED?
Wouldn't the propagandists that now dominate the government and all
societies of America and most other governments, then turn
white with fear?
57.
How come the best two ways to terrify someone in treason is
to show him a defeated dictator contained under
no-fly-zones, or to demand that all his testimony must be
given under oath??
58.
How is it that President Bush could not notice his father's
memoirs giving a very crucial warning against invading Iraq?
Why were those Bush, Sr. memoirs so correct?
Dick Cheney predicts the Iraq mistake before
making it! Can't we see we suffer more when we
don't know there's a global conspiracy??
President
Bush, Senior, from his memoirs:
Trying to eliminate Saddam
...would have incurred incalculable human and political
costs. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad, and, in
effect, rule Iraq.
Going in and occupying Iraq, thus
unilaterally exceeding the UN's mandate, would have
destroyed the precedent of international response to
aggression that we hoped to establish.
Had we gone
the invasion route, the US could conceivably still be an
occupying power in a bitterly hostile land.
59. How much of the
bankrupting billions funds for war for invisible WMDs did
our troops get?
60.
How do humans forge on to "success" and "victory" in
a false
war for WMDs and mistaken attack against
an already
defeated Muslim nation?
61. Does the following
sound reasonable: Adolf Hitler walks into an
auditorium filled with his opponents and cries, "I want you
all to submit a PLAN to solve the tragedies I caused, or get
da hell out da way!! Yah!!" In other words, if
no one HAS A PLAN that can solve the astounding tragedies he
caused, no one has credibility but himself who caused the
tragedies, and all must get out of the way so that he can
continue to make the tragedy get worse.
62. If the Democrats
can't submit a plan for terror or war to compare with
Bush's, just then compare his terror plan with every other
president before him! Now, what did Bill Clinton tell
you was his terror plan when you asked him?
63.
You did ask Clinton for a terror plan, didn't you?
Bush Sr.? Reagan? You did ask them, huh?
What, you didn't??? If not, then why not? [They
didn't because no other president failed the American people
to have terrorism actually touch them, like Bush.]
64. Why do people do everything but
tell us in a free country that people must not believe there
is a conspiracy?
65. Why don't those who struggle to
make sure the American people stop saying there is a
conspiracy do anything against the leaders to make them to
understand that persistent, growing daring and unprecedented suspicious
activity, cover-ups and constitutional tampering will make
people believe there is a conspiracy?
66. Why is every clear act of
treason or cover-up labeled, "mistake," "botch-up," or
"error?" If all those escalating botch-ups and
mistakes suddenly vanish after Martial Law comes, will
people then be able to understand that there's a conspiracy?
67. America can't seem to capture
Osama Bin Laden even though she is still yet free! Are
you sure she will also not be able to catch you if Martial
Law is installed?
68. Why did the American forefathers
believe there was a global conspiracy, and why did this
cause them to insert the Second Amendment to arm citizens
against the federal government just in case, and become
"isolationists?"
69. Why do such people claim we are
paranoid to believe that a conspiracy exists, and stake much
time and pain to get us out of that, and remained silent
when Bush saw a contained and defeated dictator overseas and
started war with him on the premise that he would destroy
America and that it must be saved?
70.
Why don't strange participants on internet forums first
state to everyone that they must not believe there is a
conspiracy and state why? What is it on the internet
that wakes them up everywhere and approach anyone who writes
about that to then start a relentless insult campaign
against them? (None of those forums state on the forum
rules you must agree with thought police, nor that you
cannot honestly believe in a free country that there is a
global conspiracy.)
71. Why then do lies, cover-ups and
activities against the Constitution of the United States
then escalate so much notwithstanding certain people get
tortured by "conspiracy theorists?"
How come those who
can't sleep because the "Conspiracy theorists" are around
are the ones responsible for the suspicious activity growing
hour after hour?
72. How come in every single case
reported of voter fraud, irregularity or cheating, the only
party mentioned responsible for it is the Christian "family
values" party, the Republicans, while the amoral liberal
class, the Democrats, were always innocent? Are
creative forms of cheating crucial in re-electing George W.
Bush?
73. Why, after so
many Americans--even by vote--struggle to stop this
"democracy-loving" president from shedding Arab and Muslim
blood, does Osama and the other terrorists reward them by
spending so much time, effort and money to attack everyone
else except that "democracy-loving" president? Why
attack those who try to stop that "democracy-loving"
president, knowing this will make the national leaders who
make decisions against Islam and Arabs much more powerful?
Bush then made an illegal war against an Arab nation taking
far more lives than 911.
74. What will happen
to the Arab and Muslim agenda, and when will mission be
accomplished for them by attacking the American people and
American soldiers instead of the leaders? When President
Bush becomes an absolute dictator? [He claims power
even above the Constitution of the United States especially
after terror attacks that he fails to protect the American
people from.
As they gain this power, they restrict the liberties of
the American people the terrorists want to attack so
badly
AND THEREFORE RESTRICT THEIR ABILITY TO PROTEST AGAINST
THE WARS THAT THREATEN ARAB AND MUSLIM LIFE!]
75. Why do Bush propagandists all
over the internet evade and pretend we're not asking them
when they plan to urge Bush to go after Osama? They
conspicuously show that they want Osama to remain free.
76. Why then, in the month of June
2008 did Barrack Obama claim that he doesn't want Osama to
be a martyr for whatever reasons he mentioned, but didn't
have a problem with Saddam being one? Should Osama
live because he attacked America and Saddam must die because
he did not?
Is it just a mistake
in judgment that President Obama would dread making Osama
Bin Laden a martyr, but then surge our sons and daughters in
Afghanistan to make them martyrs in order to "stop Al Qaedda?"
Matthew 26:31
Then saith Jesus unto them,
...it is
written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the
flock shall be scattered abroad.
77. Why then would propagandists
laugh at the prospect of "terrorists" having trials,
claiming it would be ridiculous for Osama Bin Laden to have
a trial, after allowing Saddam Hussein a trial and proper
due process above the Patriot Act? Why can't anyone
see this is the monumental proof that the Patriot Act, never
used nor needed before in America, is not needed now?
Can't you understand that Saddam got a privilege denied to
the American citizens since one president failed to protect
beyond precedent??
IF EVEN SADDAM GOT
DUE PROCESS, IT IS QUITE CLEAR THAT ANYONE CAN!
BUSH AND FASCIST PRINCIPLE: TERRORISM CAN
ONLY BE CONQUERED USING
INJUSTICE!
Then comes the paranoid claim that terrorists
are among the American people, therefore the
American people must suffer
INJUSTICE
so that terrorism is to be conquered.
Arrest and detainment indefinitely without
charge =
INJUSTICE
No
communication home or with your own defense team
=
INJUSTICE
No
judicial review about what the government is
doing to you (respected judges in our courts
would be a hindrance to SECURITY) =
INJUSTICE
Government snooping on your private affairs
without you being charged =
INJUSTICE
Tried, condemned, or even
condemned and executed in SECRET =
INJUSTICE
Why is it and how is it that every one who
dreams up these anti-American ideas always seem
to accurately know that he would never become
a victim of them? If only these unjust
rules would effect them also, don't you think
that could finally convert them to American?
High American leaders are not on par with us
anymore. The Constitution of the
United States demands equal JUSTICE under
law. Under the Constitution of the
United States, GW Bush
would be forced to be on the same par with
us and would have been executed long time
ago and even on his own terms to arrest
anyone without charge on suspicion of ties
to terrorists. Because of their "new"
laws of secrecy, they become gods, prevent
any defense from their accusations and
conclusions, and they become jury, judges
and executioners without anyone getting a
chance to review their decisions.
Naturally they themselves are then immune
from all prosecution for anything.
All these draconian rules came from people who
were 100% wrong about everything related to the
Iraq War, who are determined to start more wars
with AT LEAST Iran, AND WHO OVERSAW THE AMERICAN
ECONOMY FOR YEARS AND ALLOWED IT TO FALL INTO
CRISIS.
Who are forever willing to overlook President
Bush's long ties to Osama Bin Laden and the
Saudis, and to then empower President Bush,
though wrong on almost everything, to destroy
anyone he pleases merely on an accusation and
literally on the books to become an absolute
dictator.
INJUSTICE IS NEVER NECESSARY FOR SECURITY!
IN TIMES OF TROUBLE OR CRISIS, JUSTICE IS MORE
NECESSARY THAN IN TIMES OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY!
78. Why do we give much more respect
to these terrorists and believe they are so much smarter
when, some 45 years ago, terrorists took care of President
John F. Kennedy in such a way that he was much much weaker
in contrast today with terrorists who attack everything else
but President Bush and thence make him much, much stronger?
79. If interrogations and even
secret ones are important to protect us from terror, as the
Bush team claims, why do they themselves spit on the
practice and show that they are actual hindrances?
Watch Attorney General Alberto
Gonzalez spit on the practice of interrogations without
shame before the entire globe and play the Jesuit in just
the same way as the strange posters on the internet who
condone genocide:
(He was being asked questions not even directly
related to terrorism. Notice how he constantly
repeats giving replies that don't answer the
questions.
He first said he was trying to answer Schumer's
questions. When Schumer then asked him WHY HE
CAN'T answer the questions, he began to describe why
he can't!)
YOU HAVE TO FIRST KNOW HOW TO DISRESPECT THE
GLOBAL POPULATION BOLDLY AND IN PUBLIC BEFORE YOU CAN
DO IT IN SECRET CAMPS AND PRISONS!
80. From what we see in last question showing
Alberto Gonzalez evading answering some of the
simplest questions without shame in front of the
entire globe (like the massive propaganda team on
the internet that would jump on you if you believe
in a free country that there's a global conspiracy),
why do thought police approach us and tell us we
dare not assume that because of that, the Bush team
is involved in any kind of treason?
81. Why then did these same
thought police remain quiet when Bush brought the
Patriot Act and claimed he can ASSUME that any
American is a terrorist or is involved with
terrorists, and then can become a detainee and held
without charge indefinitely? Why is the Bush
team allowed to assume anything against billions,
and their vast propaganda team go irate if we ASSUME
anything about Bush or his close comrades?
82. Can Schumer,
interviewing Alberto Gonzalez, and the entire
Congressional panel then assume Gonzalez is guilty
and punish him based upon his complete disrespect of
the reviewing process and the entire globe LIKE ALL
THE JUDGE SHOWS ON TV OBVIOUSLY WOULD?
83. If not, CAN DETAINEES
RESPOND IN JUST THE SAME WAY AS GONZALEZ DOES AND
THEN MUST BE FREED FROM ALL GUILT AND ASSUMPTIONS?
[Thought police responded by saying the situation is
different because detainees are different from our
national leaders. Our response was that Bush
claims on paper that ANYONE can gain detainee status
on his mere whim even though he has had direct ties
to every
element involved in the 911 disaster (Osama and the
Saudis) for years and all America has not!]
84. Is President Bush
finally, in the entire history of the globe, the
only secretive closed-doors president in history who
is not involved in treason?
85. Why did
Bush claim that Iran's secrecy about its nuclear
program is proof that it's developing nuclear
weapons and will not accept Iran claiming it is
secret for "national security" concerns or for their
necessity to have "executive privilege?" [Remember
these were the tactics used for president Bush to
make everything about his unprecedented actions
[IN
AMERICA]
secret and to
appear
legitimate and American.
[PRESIDENT BUSH'S ACTIONS
AND SECURITY
POLICIES ARE NOT UNIQUE TO
FASCIST COUNTRIES.]
He also claimed "executive privilege" when asked to
turn over documents revealing why 8 top prosecutors
were fired abruptly on the claim their performance
was not up to par.]
86. Why, after the American
people finally knew the name "Osama Bin-Laden" and
the danger he posed to America, did Bush boldly tell
them and the globe that he is not going after Osama?
87. Why then do
propagandists constantly tell us that Bill Clinton
is responsible for 911 and for Osama not being
caught as yet? Of the two, only GW Bush boldly
told us he is not going after Osama, after the name
Osama became a household name. Bush is also
the only one who refused to testify alone and under
oath during the much obstructed and much belated 911
investigations. How come when Bush
propagandists show us letters from soldiers who have
died in Iraq, which say they are dying for our
freedoms, and we then ask them if they will urge
Bush to go after Osama in lieu of the horrific loss
of life, they go silent and conspicuously evade?
[We keep asking them about this and they ignore us
and evade, SHOWING CONSPICUOUSLY THAT THEY ALSO WANT
OSAMA TO REMAIN FREE!] Are these the same ones
blaming Bill Clinton for 911 claiming that he let
Osama run free?
88. Why do people tell us
that 911 took place because former President Bill
Clinton failed to protect us? They claimed he
was laxed on terror.
89. Why then was former
President Bill Clinton more stringent against
terrorism than all the other presidents before him?
90. How come then the more
backward we go into history is the more laxed each
administration was against TERROR, and yet the
more terrorism didn't bother us? [Even the
word was not in the textbooks or anywhere else
when Grandma was growing up. Acts of war
were known, but any claim that the sky was
falling because of Middle Eastern terrorists and
thence the Constitution needs to be trashed by
the crusaders against paranoia did not take
place, and neither did the Patriot Act: a
"vital" law that was missing for the entire
spread of the existence of the United States,
and that comes only with Bush and any other New
World Order regime change devotee. All
such principles for security were only well
practiced by the Communists, Nazis
and other brutal regimes in contrast to America].
91. Why couldn't terrorists
have thought to attack us internally before?
[They
did, but couldn't. All positions of protection
were mostly staffed by true Americans. Also
Middle Eastern Muslim extremists feared a backlash
from a major superpower with their hands filled with
Israel enough as it was. They feared more
blood would be taken by the United States than they
would take. More
importantly, their leaders feared death either for
being cowardly, or because they believed if they
were killed, their cause for
global treason would be destroyed.
The
situation changed when our national leaders actually
had ties to these Muslim terrorists and now their
Muslim leaders give the terrorists and suicide
bombers orders to do the unthinkable. The
Muslim leaders order their servants to do it anyway,
knowing these leaders themselves will escape harm,
without any thought of a backlash,
even though generations of Muslims will be killed in
consequence: betrayal against Muslims by their
leaders also.
It's not a mistake that Osama Bin Laden is still
free today and fascist propagandists on the
internet would attack you if you express the
belief that Osama should be captured, jailed and
tried?]
92. Why do such people teach
us that a president now unprecedented in failing to
protect the American people must be made a king and
rewarded for failing to protect us unlike all the
other presidents before him?
93.
If Bush is so fabulously rewarded for failing to
protect us, why should even future presidents want
to protect us? How come every other president
before him couldn't think of just failing to protect
us so that they can acquire powers even above the
Constitution and possibly become dictators? [The
reason they couldn't is because they didn't have so
many others saturated throughout the government and
infiltrated into all political parties that would
allow such things.]
94. Since Bush is being so
fabulously rewarded for failing to protect us, how
are we going to honor those presidents before him
who did not fail to protect us? Should they
then be condemned instead?
95.
If the Bush propagandists praised GW Bush to the
hilt for allowing 4 planes to devastate America,
would they worship me as a god if I were president
and allowed 5 to do more devastation? Would
they then insist that I must be re-elected or else
other terror attacks can come despite my unique
failure like the Bush propagandists did?
96. Besides the massive
propaganda team, why were the American people afraid
to vote for John Kerry because they felt he was weak
on security issues when George Bush failed to
protect the American people unprecedented in the
entire history of America?
97. Are you prepared to
accept the fact that if security guards struggle for
employment from the Bush supporters to protect their
interests and tell the Bush propagandists that they
will offer them 911 quality security for their
interests, the Bush propagandists will hire them and
make them king over all their affairs?
98. Why did President Bush
become paranoid over the threat Iraq that we beat so
badly in Operation Desert Storm could pose, when, in
the late 70s while I was in college, I was informed
that the surveillance capabilities of America were
good enough to see a basketball on the ground from
space? And we still couldn't know that Iraq
had no WMDs? Iraq didn't have these advantages
of aerial surveillance against us, but Bush told us
that even if no WMDs were there, he would have
attacked Iraq anyway in order to "SAVE AMERICA!"
People
are forgetting that direct quotation.
99.
Why did Bush
tell us that torture is necessary for extracting
information that could save lives, and therefore
included it in his security and foreign policies,
AND YET FORGOT TO TORTURE SADDAM TO EVEN REVEAL
WHERE HIS WMDS WERE STASHED? [He named
Saddam as the main man in terror! On paper,
every American is lower than Saddam and will not
receive the due process he received! Bush
didn't torture Saddam to reveal where he stashed his WMDs obviously because Bush knew Saddam had none!
Saddam didn't suffer from the Patriot Act at all!
Is it therefore that necessary? Saddam was
caught and was in our hands. Others were
tortured by us.]
100. If it is a fact that
only a perfect man is eligible to be given the right
to destroy people based merely on an accusation
without due process, why does the High Court and
Congress determine--especially as shown through the
confirmation of Sam Alito to the court--that
President Bush must have these rights based upon
failing to protect the American people without
precedent???
102. Why after people
protest the unprecedented reign of GW Bush,
propagandists stand up and scream they are "bashing
America?" Will such people have detainment
camps big enough to wipe the 2006 protest vote
"against America" out of history? The 2006
vote was a protest vote BY
AMERICA against President Bush, NOT against
America! What did Bush do wrong,
other than kill our sons and daughters for invisible WMDs and still yet does not blush, but claims he
must be made king?
Before the Inquisitions return upon the
earth again by the Antichrist, it will start
THIS WAY!
103. How is it that the more
our sons and daughters die to "defend our freedoms,"
is the more the Bush propagandists on the internet
are talking about Martial Law coming and detainment
camps?
104. Why does Bush and Blair
keep saying that "history will prove" the Iraq War
was the right thing to do, AFTER we used valuable
resources searching for WMDs and never found them?
Isn't it a bummer that we used principles for
security directly right out of even ancient history
to deal with all this and to frame our security
principles? Is it true history didn't yet
prove that principles for security from the
Communists and Nazis would lead to disaster?
Should we carry tape
recorders with us into detention camps when
Martial Law comes and play it to the government
when they prepare to tell us while in there,
that history will prove all they have done was
the right thing to do?
105. If
19 hijackers successfully attack America at 911,
how many detainment camps should we build in
response for security? Should we build 19
detainment camps for the 19 hijackers in order
to avoid PARANOIA? Each detainment camp
can hold thousands of people. Why are
hundreds of detainment camps that can hold
MILLIONS of people now built all over America?
Is this a Martial Law exercise against paranoia?
Isn't this showing that the government is
seeking to contain different people?
Youtube
video of Martial Law exercises taking
place in the year 2000. Remember,
911 took place in late 2001!
Having foresight that disaster
is coming to America is supposed to make our
national leaders use that foresight TO STOP THE
DISASTER. Shouldn't all the resources used
in building these detention camps in expectation
of the closing down of America and the staging
of Martial Law exercises rather be used to stop the
danger? Are these resource-wasting
exercises being used to stop Americans from
using food stamps in these recessionary times in
the detention camps?
106. Why has "doing what I
believe is best for the country" includes swearing
an oath of allegiance to the Constitution with every
intent to completely disregard it? Why has
this replaced obedience to the Constitution being
sworn to? What then if everything messes up?
After everything messes up, will those who do this
recognize that it's their hatred of the Constitution
that made everything mess up?
Mr. Tony Blair
and Mr. Bush: Did you know that every fascist
regime had leaders who always did what they thought
was best for their countries?
107. Why did those
who allowed the worst financial crisis to fall
upon America and the globe tell us we must bail
out the financial terrorists who brought it
about and now keep telling us that all the funds
we are using to recover are not sufficient?
Why then are the same people telling us about a
NEW WORLD ORDER that is already built? Was
it funded with mud-pies and lemonade stands?
Where did the money come from that built it?
If you were an elderly
person who entrusted your son to pay the
mortgage of your house, but he keeps coming back
and telling you that the payments have increased
and then keeps telling you that it's harder and
harder to save it, then you hear from the
grapevine that a MANSION is being built (A NEW WORLD ORDER), wouldn't
you know that something is wrong?
108. Why do
propagandists on the internet constantly telling us
President Bush is the best president we ever had
with unique principles that are the best ever to
handle terrorism, never show us the posts they made
on the internet with concern for terrorism before
Bush came?
Yes, we
keep asking this question and they keep mentally
diagnosing us with the same fascist persistence
[they don't waver nor flip-flop] practiced in
concentration camps by America's foremost historical
enemies.
109. Why do treasonous
leaders and propagandists everywhere attack us
claiming we have a "pre-911 mentality" to actually
expect that the government is supposed to have the
power to protect us from terrorists
like it always had since the
beginning, and urge us to give that up now?
110. Why are those in
treason constantly telling us we cannot afford to
have the "pre-911 mentality" of giving trials to
terrorists,
AFTER ALREADY
TELLING US THROUGH THE PATRIOT ACT THAT ANYONE CAN
ACQUIRE TERRORIST STATUS ON THE
MERE
WHIM
AND ACCUSATION
OF THE ONLY
PRESIDENT WE KNOW OF WHO HAS HAD BOTH TIES TO OSAMA
BIN LADEN AND THE SAUDIS?
111. Does Susan
Williams believe terrorists should actually have
trials?? Answer: NO! Terrorists
should not be given civilian trials
NOR TRIALS AT ALL!
A terrorist is supposed to
be someone WHO ALREADY HAS BEEN OPENLY TRIED AND
THEN FOUND TO BE A TERRORIST! If he's a
terrorist before a free and open trial, then someone
who accused him DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THE AMERICAN
PRINCIPLE THAT ALL ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTIL
PROVEN GUILTY!
112. What kind of
absolute jackass would support making sure
terrorists don't get trials nor humane treatment
without first making sure the Patriot Act doesn't
have the ability to make any American acquire that
status for any reason the President wants? It
couldn't be the American citizens, could it?
You would support making sure terrorists don't get
trials while the Patriot Act claims you can be
declared one for any reason the most failing
president in US history wants??
How come treason
then constantly insists they can torture and do
anything they want with any "terrorist" WHILE MAKING
SURE THEY AVOID EXPLAINING TO THE PEOPLE HOW THE
PERSON WHO IS A TERRORIST GOT THAT STATUS? If
there is to be no trials, how did the terrorist
become a terrorist?
113.
Why are contemporary politicians telling us
constantly that we must not look back into the
past, but must move forward? America then
did wrong financial things and then sucked the
whole world's financial network into a horrible
black hole [EXCEPT
THEIR DARLING COMMUNIST COUNTRIES WHICH NOW
UTILIZE THE POWERFUL CONCEPT THAT PRESERVED
AMERICA TO THIS DAY NOW WIDELY MOCKED CALLED,
"ISOLATIONISM."] Why can't our politicians be
reminded of what caused all of this when
politicians and financial terrorists before them
worked day and night
TO LINK ALL
THE ECONOMIES OF THE WORLD TOGETHER? Why
can't they realize that linking up the global
economies was wrong, and also REWARD THOSE WHO
WARNED OUR POLITICIANS IN HISTORY NOT TO LINK UP
THE ECONOMIES OF THE GLOBE? They're
supposed to then punish the ones who did the
linking up. They might then have to punish
themselves!
Because of corporate treason, as the
Antichrist grows stronger, people with much
experience in politics will be making
"mistakes" so bad, it would be better to
elect the inexperienced who even earn
minimum wage!
IF YOU CAN IMPEACH THESE AND THE ENTIRE
CONGRESS BOTH DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN,
[Independents too!]
THEN, AND ONLY THEN, CAN PRESIDENT BUSH BE
IMPEACHED!
Treason of the
Supreme Court, the United Nations, and Congress
114.
Why didn't the
Supreme Court realize that "Conspiracy Theorists"
would have allowed an election recount if votes are
not sure instead of becoming paranoid and stopping a
recount and then sending propaganda periodicals to
tell us that Bush would have won anyway? One
bullet to former President JFK caused many more to
die in Vietman.
EXACTLY WHAT
DID ONE UNANIMOUS BOUT OF PSYCHOTIC PARANOIA COST
AMERICA THIS TIME?
115. Why did the Supreme
Court finally realize that President Bush
overstepped his authority at Guantanamo Bay acquired
through failing to protect the American people, when
even multitudes of mentally retarded folk figured
that out a long time ago? Is one requirement
for the High Court to have bad reflexes?
116. Why does the Supreme
Court, realizing the many unprecedented mistakes of
President Bush to even the embarrassing starting of
an illegal war in paranoia, looking for invisible
WMDs to the taking of multitudes of lives, still
struggle to maintain the right to make him a
dictator and give the whole farm over to him
[as shown in the drive to appoint Sam Alito to
the High Court]?
117. How come the Supreme
Court and Congress cannot understand that Bush has a
talent to give inaccurate information to billions of
people? Why then would they want to empower
him to destroy a person merely by making an
accusation considering the accuracy of much of what
he says? He doesn't make "mistakes?" Why
then forbid any of his victims under accusation to
prove he has made any?
119. Do members of the High
Court and Congress know that the "Conspiracy
Theorists" would have gotten rid of any government
official who has a talent of giving inaccurate
information a long time ago, and that promises,
government aspirations and records cannot survive if
one in the highest office is proud to habitually
give inaccurate information to the globe?
120. Why didn't the High
Court nor Congress consider it strange that Bush
actually
proudly showed
pictures of 911 for his re-election campaign since
Bush failed to protect the American people on that
fateful day? Is this action supposed to
communicate the same kind of grief Bush showed when
he stood up on the pulpit of 911, and with tears
stated that he will destroy all evil and that all
who are not with us are with the terrorists?
[GW Bush was not only not in tears at all, but, with
distressed and even tearful faces all around him at
Ground Zero, he was singularly noted for having a
bright face that looked like he scored a touchdown
in the end zone for his underdog team that won the
game. This assessment was proven accurate by
the proud way he showed pictures of the 911 disaster
for his re-election campaign. Would it be a
crime to then say he doesn't care about the 3,000
victims who lost their lives at 911? How then
much more cruel would it be to say that Bush had
major involvement in that disaster? Any
similarities then with the government rapidly
placing laws on the books that grants them dictator
status in the event of major crises in America
before those crises come?]
121. Why didn't the High
Court nor Congress consider it strange that a
president would claim the powers of a king for
failing to protect the American people?
Would any
future president claiming credit for protecting
America be condemned?
122. Who would think
there is a conspiracy and why would our national
leaders hyperventilate because Americans at least
believe there is a global one when the country saw
only one politician voted against the institution of
the Patriot Act after 911, and then only because HE
READ THE PROPOSALS FIRST???
123. Why did the Democrats
fail to mention all during the
2006 campaign
that "impeachment is off the table," and that they
would rather work with the problem (Bush) instead?
124. Why did they claim they
will not "take revenge" on President Bush, giving a
precedent where it would be prudent for American
government to release all prisoners in jail because
it was unbecoming of the government to "take
revenge" on them?
125. Why were the Democrats
so eager to betray the American people, till they
couldn't even wait till they sat in their seats of
power, but unleashed that they would not impeach
president Bush just after the election results?
126. Why did House
Speaker
Nancy Pelosi, on July 17,
2008, call President Bush a "total failure" in his
presidency,
after heading a Congress that constantly gave
him everything he wanted not since day one, BUT
EVEN BEFORE DAY ONE? [Before they even sat
in power, just after the elections of 2006, the
newly elected Democratic Congress suddenly
started to say that they will not impeach
President Bush, but would work with him.
This shocking news they avoided to let the
people know during the entire campaign for their
election. Since that shocking
announcement, they kept that promise better than
any other they had made. Why therefore
does Nancy Pelosi claim President Bush is a
failure when President Bush SUCCEEDED virtually 100% in getting them
to do what he wants?]
127.
Why did the Democrats suddenly acquire the reasoning
of President Bush after they were elected to finally
check him, and began to say that they could not
de-fund the wars and therefore leave our soldiers out
there ill-equipped? If even janitors were
elected to de-fund the wars and then kept their
campaign promises, would they then leave the troops
out there after the wars are de-funded? INSANITY!
128. Why did Al Gore
willingly concede defeat to the 2000 elections that
were wrested from him, and then now urges that
President Bush must not be impeached because trying
to do so would not be successful? Why has John
Kerry done the same? (This great nation came into
being by humble people who saw no true means of
succeeding the vast job of creating it, but claimed
it was the right thing to do anyway and moved ahead
undaunted!)
NANCY PELOSI: "Bush, you are a FAILURE
as a president!
At least you got everything you wanted from
me 100% of the time even against the wishes
of the American people! It's a good
thing you didn't ask me for any other
favors!
Please don't tell anybody how
EASY I am!"
129. Why then don't the
American people understand that Bush cannot be
impeached without the same being done to the High
Court Justices, Republican members of Congress and
most Democratic members of Congress?
130. Why do members of the
other branches of government constantly claim that
Bush can't be impeached because he is too powerful?
Why can't the American people teach them that it is
their job description to check the executive branch
of government to make sure he doesn't get "too
powerful" so they can get a good job approval rating
that justifies their high salaries? Would they
be willing to change the requirements for office,
step aside and hire janitors to do what they are
supposed to? Would the janitors fail?
Watching someone in the
Congressional or Judicial branches of government smile while
saying that we can't impeach president Bush
"because he's too powerful,"
is the same as watching that
same person
smiling and saying:
"We can't impeach president
Bush, because we didn't do our jobs!"
131. If we consider that,
for some strange reason, we have been rather free of
terror attacks before Bush, could it be because
terrorists had something to fear because of all the
other presidents before Bush?
132. What then could have
ended the fear terrorists had of American presidents
when Bush came besides Bush's strong efforts to sell
our ports over to the United Arab Emirates who
financed 911?
133. How come because of
Bush's failure to protect the American people, all
the American people are automatic suspects to
terrorism when he is the only person most Americans
know of who has actual family ties to terrorists?
[The Bin Laden family
and the
Saudis.]
134.
If Russia suddenly attacked and destroyed Canada
(hypothetically) on our borders because they thought
Canada had WMDs, and after finding they were wrong,
did not blush but remained as an occupying power,
should America arm itself? Should America
meddle? Why is it that the High Court,
Congress and the United Nations can't understand
that Iran has a right to do this? Do you think
America should meddle or arm herself if Russia
destroyed Canada? Why does the High Court,
Congress and the United Nations still believe there
is no consequence for starting a false war of
aggression after insulting and ignoring
massive forces
that struggled to stop them from making the mistake?
How come we never heard
much about this situation with Iran's nuclear
program before the Constitutionally illegal Iraq
War?
[If I was ruler over a country not too friendly
with another very powerful one, and an "oops!"
war like the Iraq War was staged on my borders
without a blush from that aggressor country
that then insisted on remaining and being an
occupying power,
trust me, I would seek nuclear arms and get
involved. How about you?]
135.
Why is the Bush Administration covering up the
destruction of CIA tapes documenting aggressive
"interrogation techniques"
(a deceptive and treasonous means to
hide the fact that it is TORTURE)
by the government against
suspected terrorists?
136. The
government said they had to destroy the tapes, or
else the identities of the interrogators could
become known and they could be jeopardized.
Would that then make these interrogators acquire the
status of Valerie Plame? [She was the woman
who was a CIA operative whose identity was
compromised by the Bush Administration.
Her husband was critical of the
Bush Administration
and exposed his "yellow cake" lie.
Historically fascist regimes always worked in
secrecy and cover-up IN ORDER TO CONCEAL THE FACT
THAT THEY WERE MONSTERS. Why would America
really need secrecy?
CIA
INTERROGATOR: "BUT THE DEVILS (Bush and
Cheney) MADE US DO IT!"
REPLY:
Alright, show us the letters you wrote even
privately in protest. Show us the stolid
efforts you made to evade doing what they asked
you to do. Show us the sweat that came
from your treasonous veins and capillaries after
that great conflict between your Americanism and
Bush's fascism emerged and went head to head.
Did Bush tell you to threaten detainees with
power drills? Did Bush tell you to
waterboard some detainees as much as 82 times?
Did Bush tell you to torture some till they
died? Did you show Bush that you were a
weak fascist? Or did you make him proud! [Even
during WWII, all claims by war criminals that
their superiors ordered them to commit
atrocities were ignored by international courts
of justice.]
137. Should
we interrupt Osama
Bin Laden
having Thanksgiving dinner to ask
him whether he feels President Bush has been a great
success in American security?
If not, then how about next
Thanksgiving?
138. Besides the Third
Reich
or Nazi Germany, is there another regime that would start wars
in order to "save innocent lives" and then take much
more innocent lives?
139. The symbol of the Cross, and the symbol of
Skull and Bones! Which will dominate your
life?
What is
the secret to Bush's very strong desire to "save
innocent lives" all over the world? If you
were able to acquire his Skull & Bones insignia he acquired from his affiliation to that secret
society,
would you then acquire the same desire to start wars
to save innocent lives? [It's the same
insignia the Nazis war on their uniforms].
A MESSAGE FROM THE THIRD REICH!...
"BIG DEAL! We also used war to save
innocent lives and took much more than our
enemies we had to stop, Mr. Bush! You
ain't got nothin' on us!"
140. Since
Saddam was ruthless and took much innocent life,
what happened to the scorecards and statistics of
innocent lives being lost after Bush decided to walk
in the steps of Nazis? What percent reduction
of lives lost did we gain?
141. If ghosts are
real, why do they always forget to haunt people of
the likes of Ted Bundy, Osama Bin Laden, Adolf
Hitler, Joseph Stalin or George Bush, the United Nations, the Supreme Court
and the
Congress?
[They
urged an attack on an already defeated dictator in
order to find dangerous WMDs that threatened
innocent lives. How should they feel after
finding out there were none and hundreds of
thousands of innocents perished who would not have
if they listened to the "conspiracy theorists?"
They are showing you. That's why now they must
adopt the position that they must "look forward"
instead of backward. The problem with this is
their great archives under the Patriot Act
containing your private information. That
information is historical information to look
backward on you.]
142. How come, with all of
this, those who still insist we must not know there
is a conspiracy, struggle to make sure that these
clearly treasonous activities escalate day after day
after day?
The Invalidity of
the 911 Independent Investigations
143. Why did such people
allow and fight to make us believe it is normal for
an "independent investigation" of the most major
internal tragedy in the United States to take place
at least
a year after the event? Why are they
determined no one must believe there is something
wrong with this? (The proper way to handle all
tragedies is to stage thorough investigation right
away. That way evidence is fresh and people
interviewed will make statements that can be matched
with their later statements to test their
coherency.) ["Conspiracy theorists" would have
allowed the late investigation to get as much
information as possible, but would have declared the
whole endeavor basically INVALID for being staged so
late!
It sure doesn't
look like all the hyped-up experts and professionals
excel over the "conspiracy theorists" on this point.
I suppose that's why we never suffered from the
"conspiracy theorists" but have always only been
suffering from the "experts" who can't function
without solid proof for everything except
the existence of WMDs!]
144. Why do such expect us
to believe that under the weight of 3,000 graves,
the president who failed to protect them can refuse
to testify cleanly under oath at the investigation
that took place
so much later,
and wound up finally testifying not under oath, but
at the same time with the second most honest person
in the world (Dick Cheney) does not give fuel to the
big bad ol' "conspiracy theorists?" Just the weight
of 3,000 graves would force any American to testify
trembling, let alone their protector supposed to
give them protection they paid high taxes for!
The Cost of Energy
Tripled Since the Bush Administration
145. Why, since the Bush
Administration, did fuel prices uniquely get so high
and the American people can't figure out why, even
though Bush struggled to sell our ports over to the
United Arab Emirates who were involved in financing
911?
Why can't even
fuel prices regularly falling only at election time,
convince certain people that a certain person bears
heavy responsibility?
146. Supply, demand,
developing China, developing India, offshore oil
drilling restrictions, weak dollar, record fuel
prices virtually
quadrupled that lowers every time Bush is in
elections: Only one of these things came after
Bush became president. Can you figure out
which? Why did supply, demand, China, India,
offshore oil drilling restrictions and a weak dollar
wait for Bush to arrive to produce record fuel
prices almost quadrupled?
147.
Who would make the American people vote for an
oilman for president and then have no idea why fuel
prices would at least triple above all history?
The South American
Country of Paraquay
148. Why did President Bush
become the only American president to have an
interest in and buy thousands of acres of land in
the South American country of Paraquay? [That
country is famous for granting asylum to war
criminals and Nazis. Even Bush's daughters are
learning to speak Spanish over there!]
149.
Why doesn't Bush know that country is famous for
harboring Nazi war criminals and therefore put that
country on his hit-list for the Global War on Terror?
150.
Why, before buying land in the South American
country of Paraguay, did Bush first secure an
agreement that he and heavily armed soldiers with
him be not tried for war crimes? Why no desire
to clear his name?
If he knows already that he's a
war criminal, why can't his propagandists figure it
out?
Remember when people began saying that the
Iraq War was a failure years ago and the warmongers emotionally responded
that they must not say that because it damaged the morale of our dying
troops who were tricked into chasing the no-fly-zones? Now even the
warmongers are telling us the great gift they are giving to our dying troops
and the ones that died. They are verbally saying that "America is
BROKEN!" They are forgetting to warn people not to say this. Is
this chronic amnesia? Is it that obvious? At least they stopped
Saddam, didn't they?
What then happens to all the laws they've
established that say upon a major crisis or catastrophe we lose our freedoms
our troops died for and they become dictators? Were our dying troops
screwed? What will some of them come back to after their super-human
efforts to "defend our freedoms?"
The American
forefathers, with all their terrible faults we are constantly told about,
never had to refer to their much less prosperous America as, "BROKEN." THEY WERE
"ISOLATIONISTS."
Problems that develop are re-enacted in
the TV Program, "FORENSIC FILES." In those programs, murders take
place. How do we solve those problems and even develop procedures and
techniques to make sure they don't happen again? They gather
information FROM THE PAST. They try to find out what wrong things were
done, and who done it in order to deter those wrong actions from taking
place again!
America's problems, on the other hand, are
permanent since President Obama tells us, "Let's look forward"--forward to
the day when Americans line the HUNDREDS of detention camps all around them
and then think to curse out Osama Bin Laden for putting them in there.
We can figure out now before we go into those camps which actual Muslims
"broke" America.
The Patriot Act mandates that the FEDS
collect all our private information AND ARCHIVE THEM with the lie they're
not going to "look backward" on our information. If President Obama
believed his fairy tale concept of not looking backward, he would have
noticed that this problem in archives needs to be corrected. He also
would not have stood at the Holocaust Memorial around Washington, DC and
challenged Iranian President Ahmadinejad to look backward in history and
understand that the Holocaust was real.
Obama's State of the Union Address, much
like GW Bush's, has many words and avoids the solutions to fixing America.
They are repetitively the same
CONSTANTLY CALLING FOR MORE SPENDING or persistence in wrong policies. Remember that GW Bush's speeches
were always repeats and the problems he brought then kept getting worse to
the present day where no one can now LOOK BACKWARD and tell the damage he
has done to America and FREEDOM?
President Obama continues an insane and TREASONOUSLY deliberate no mentioning of the
necessity of going into history and finding out what put us in this mess.
After all, just after he was elected, he FOLLOWED GW Bush with the bailouts,
and promised to stop the wars, but verbally claimed he will delay pulling
out the troops in Iraq till 2011, and then, at least twice, surged our
troops into Afghanistan to continue that ridiculous war that ignores the
leader of Al Qaedda. More troops are now dying under Obama, and the
national debt has more than doubled the tragedy GW Bush caused since Obama
came on the scene. Who would want to "look back" after continuing the
tragic Bush years, AND AFTER PLANNING TO PUSH IT FORWARD MORE?
DISASTER IS COMING!
Reply: "Oh you
doom and gloom!"
No,... DISASTER IS COMING.
If you didn't believe this, shouldn't we assume you would be
asking the United States government why they're building
detention camps all over the country and staging martial law
exercises to add with the expense of bankrupting wars "for
our freedoms?"
If you don't believe us as we
tell you that major disaster and catastrophe is at our
doors, then why not be inquisitive about the actions of the
FEDs which clearly show that major calamities are coming?
We are being laughed at and
looked down upon because we know disaster is coming.
We don't mind. There is a difference with us however
in that WE DON'T DESIRE TO BE VINDICATED IN OUR BELIEF.
The ridicule and revilings we receive we gladly bear because
we want the tragedies to wait and delay as long as possible.
Mercy is sweet, and if the American people are longer
allowed to enjoy mercy, we glory in the fact that we will
share some mercy too.
We don't care if the
tragedies we predict delay years longer beyond our lifespans.
It will surely not delay that long: even American bankruptcy
is right here! But we don't care if it
does. We don't want to see the tragedies.
The entire United States Military
even before the
ridiculous wars of the Bush Halliburton Regime,
vs the combined Communist militaries.
Even before the ridiculous wars the ENTIRE United States
military was sadly outnumbered by the combined militaries of
Communist China, North Korea and Russia: probably even
by Communist China ALONE! The wars are partly to make
this situation even worse with the realization that many in
the United States military have the same hearts and agenda
as the communist militaries AS IS DEMONSTRATED IN SOME OF
THE DIALOGUES SHOWN ON THIS WEBSITE, especially with their "new"
principles for security and their desires to rebuild a
global regime.
The wars are to more deplete the
numbers of constitutional soldiers. Even the much fewer constitutionally
loyal ones can be a major hindrance THROUGH HAVING ACCESS TO
THE DEADLIEST OF OUR WEAPONS.
Those in global treason know that this situation potentially
threatens their lives, so they're shipping out those soldiers in order to
have them killed. Another regime, global in nature, is being made based upon
the very global regime America won her liberties from.
Notice even Americans hear the global leaders
mention over and over again that they're building a global government and
don't even ask questions about it? These same Americans look down on
us and think we're very ignorant.
IGNORANCE: "We don't have to worry about the
Communist militaries! If they all attack us, they
know that we'll push that red button, unleash all our
nuclear weaponry and even destroy the whole world if we
have to."
IT WAS UNITY IN
GOVERNMENT (no checks and balances) THAT DESTROYED
AMERICA! That's the only explanation for why
GW Bush knew very well he could misbehave all he
wanted and have ties to Osama Bin Laden and the
Saudis while instituting laws that destroys anyone
who even vaguely is accused of having ties to
terrorists and all the other politicians can't
notice his unique ties even with all the reminders
we give them. That's the reason Bush knew
before hand that he would not be impeached.
That's the reason Bush knew before hand that upon
the election of a new Democratic "Anti-War" Congress
in 2006, he can immediately request that the wars be
EXTENDED and knew it would happen.
Left and Right United in Opposition
to Controversial SCOTUS Decision!
Much has
been made of late about
the hyper-partisan
political environment in
America. On Tuesday,
Sen. Evan Bayh explained
his surprising recent
decision to
leave the Senate by
lamenting a
"dysfunctional"
political system
riddled with "brain-dead
partisanship." It seems
you'd be hard-pressed to
get Republicans and
Democrats inside and
outside of Washington to
agree on anything
these days, that if one
party publicly stated
its intention to add a
"puppies are adorable"
declaration to its
platform, that the other
party would immediately
launch a series of
anti-puppy
advertisements.
But it
appears that one issue
does unite Americans
across the
political spectrum...
THE DANGERS OF UNITY!
We brought to light the Second Amendment which demands that
the American people be armed just in case the federal
government becomes treasonous, tyrannical and therefore
deadly. There was no thought about Muslim extremists,
and we today should wonder and marvel why the American
forefathers thought just like the present day "conspiracy
theorists." This provision of the Constitution
realizes that there is SAFETY in DIVERSITY. There is
no chance for the government to become corrupt and dangerous
with diverse politicians checking each other. With
especially three branches of government in the United
States, it is incomprehensible to us that there is ever such
a thing called "infiltration" that can be brought about
through conspiracy, where people with actually the same
minds would wind up capturing positions of public trust all
throughout at least American government and sitting on
outwardly conflicting seats and agendas, and then
participate in bickering charades of pretense giving the
impression that they are different and think differently
when they actually think the same.
When it was time to do things right and give aid to the
victims of Katrina in New Orleans, we saw that our
politicians couldn't agree on anything, and how this delayed
much needed relief that even caused loss of lives.
When it was time to end the ridiculous wars, all of a
sudden they all showed a mysterious unity toward prolonging
them. In both
examples of behavior where they were diverse and then united
in their actions, lives
were lost and they always made the wrong decisions.
They were diverse after Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans and people died.
They have always been uniting with the wars, and people have
died also because of their then new-found unity against
public opinion and approval.
We already witnessed the Democrats begging the nation to
vote for them so they can end the wars. As soon as
they won the election they immediately began to sing the
very same words of the GW Bush Administration and his warmongers. They
began to say that they don't want the war in Iraq to be a
failure "either." They then mimicked the ridiculous
statement the warmongers did, telling the world they can't de-fund the wars and leave our soldiers out there
ill-equipped--meaning that if they were to de-fund the wars,
they would have no thought to bring our troops home.
Here now are the "Anti-war" Democrats more sealing their
betrayal of the American people and their treason.
BASKING
IN THE TREASON OF PUBLIC DISTRUST AND DISAPPROVAL!
INTRODUCING THE PEOPLE WHO MOST GUARANTEED THE
PROSPERITY OF THE BUSH-HALLIBURTON REGIME!
Not
the ones who most verbally supported GW Bush, but
the ones who most condemned him!
Don't tell these guys they are the most unpopular
and distrusted Democratic party in all American
history. They might charge the government
budget too much for extra champagne, party trimmings, dancing girls and strippers.
Treasonous
"Anti-War" Democrats now telling us that the purpose
of war, "Is Peace" again more mimicking
the warmongering Republicans they were elected to
check in 2006. These are the same
war-mongering Democrats who even more greatly spat
upon public opinion and approval to support the
ridiculous wars than did the known warmongering
Republicans. Here they are more gayly basking
under the New World Order
glory of public disapproval. You
still believe they are "stinging" at the recent
rebuke in the elections in Massachusetts where they
lost a key seat?
Why then do we insist that the communist
militaries are coming here to America and will be
allowed to enter and depopulate like never before?
IF WAR IS FOR PEACE, WHY ARE THE COMMUNISTS
RENOUNCING WAR AND SAVING THEIR RESOURCES? Is
it true we can't realize that WAR was even for
HALLIBURTON?
RED FLAG:
Our national
politicians not only don't respect public opinion or what
the American people think, but they actually glory that they
are unpopular. You really believe the Democrats are
"stinging" about the recent Massachusetts elections
where they lost a key seat?
They are giving you the impression that they care, but their
actions have clearly proven that they don't.
The argument of GW Bush for his "preventive" or
"pre-emptive" wars was that there was a need to establish a
"Global Democracy" where the leaders of the world will
listen to their people. He told us that this condition
would guarantee security for the entire world. He was saying that with enough humanity viewing the goodness
and fairness of America and in agreement with her actions,
they would become convicted of what is right and this would
deter tyranny. THIS WAS A MAJOR STATED BASIS OF THE
WARS. All this was proven to be a lie by the super-unpopular yet persistent
wars and the complete spitting upon the 2006 elections where America
voted in the Democrats to stop the wars.
Here now again the "Anti-War" Democrats, long basking in the glory
of being the absolute most unpopular bunch of Democrats in
all American history, are more schooling the listening
public in the necessity of war, more glorying in their
unpopular status. But they keep calling themselves,
"Anti-War Democrats," and we then don't understand that they
are even greater warmongers than the warm-Christian-love
Republicans. Why?
Because they more fight against and
contrary to public opinion and approval to support the wars.
Is the timeless principle that actions speak louder
than words, still valid today? They will keep telling
you that they are "anti-war" Democrats. Do you believe
them?
*If there is a choice, it
would still ultimately be better to vote Democrat in order
to hopefully more open the eyes of the people. The
Republicans already showed us that they are proud and
openly-declared warmongers. Supporting the wars
appears to be more of a hypocritical act when it is done by
the Democrats and would hopefully alert the American people
that something is wrong and would hopefully more wake them
up.
The Democrats in this clipping are again repeating the lies
of the Bush warmongers, telling the world that we need wars
in order to maintain peace. Is that true? Ask
Halliburton and see what they say.
THE COMMUNIST MILITARIES ARE REMAINING QUIET AND NOW
AVOIDING WARS.
ANALYSIS: If wars are necessary to maintain peace,
what will be the result of the Communists keeping quiet and
avoiding wars? Will their quietness and present
peaceful stance then guarantee wars?
YES! Because
resources from free nations are being wasted, while
politicians in the communist countries who think like the
ones we now have know better than to waste their resources
or even attack already defeated countries while teaching the
world to avoid paranoia.
THE DANGERS OF UNITY
SPREADS TO ALL COUNTRIES OF THE GLOBE!
The unity of all our
politicians brought on and sustained wars of aggression, financial tragedy
and a clear threat to constitutional liberty penned on the
books of law. This unity puts us in a very dangerous
situation.
This unity is worse than you
can ever imagine, FOR IT ALSO SPANS LEADERSHIP IN ALMOST ALL
COUNTRIES OF THE GLOBE, and it gets worse as successors are
appointed to high offices in countries all over the globe. It is this
that has silently destroyed the balance of power principle
that has protected the world from nuclear terror and other
tragedies.
This unity brought on a linking of the
global economies, which then prompted numbers of the people
in question to push down the American economy, knowing that
other countries would be swallowed into the mess.
Having the same security
codes as the Communists, then with the exact same agenda to
establish a New World Order--a regime documented to have the
agenda to depopulate the world down to 500 million people,
if the communists attack over here, it is likely that the
United States government would respond even with nuclear weapons,
but they will make many "mistakes" and will wind up dropping
those weapons on heavily populated areas both at home and
abroad even in populated cities in the communist countries.
The communist countries will likely also retaliate and make
similar mistakes at the expense of populous cities in
America and in their own territories.
The facade of hostility between the countries
will be continued. The other free countries will then likely
join in the glory of making more "mistakes." The key is that they are
now brothers and now secretly unified. The ones on top therefore do
not feel threatened by retaliatory strikes upon them personally which in
former days deterred them from using nuclear force. They know military strikes will kill their
people, but that clearly will not bother them.
Remember,
we as a deluded people, showed them that
it is to their advantage and their glory to make mistakes
due to our own inaction. That inaction disappears when
people among us warn our neighbors about the calamities to
come, then the general public will work to oppose such
people and then become active. When our politicians make mistakes, we suffer more and pay more for
their mistakes and just sit and dream that we will always be
protected and will never experience the tragedies even the
people of Iraq were destroyed with. The Iraq War was a
failure JUST AS SOON AS A DEFEATED DICTATOR TERRIFIED PEOPLE
IN OUR HIGH ECHELONS WHO LABORED FOR DECADES TO TEACH THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE HOW TO AVOID PARANOIA. The failure of
the Iraq War was then confirmed when no WMDs were found.
George Galloway then reveals to us that we have been
shipping and selling Iraqi oil to wherever we wished as if we
think we own that country. That is the disease globalists who want to build a New World Order
always have. They
think they own the world. Why then do they tell us the
Iraq War was to maintain "peace" for the world
instead of for Halliburton?
Just the same as the propagandists who storm the internet to
intercept any realization of the bold treason dominating
America, their even super-embarrassing error of attacking
what was not there behind no-fly-zones in Iraq doesn't make
them even think to reduce the free mental diagnoses they
give those who were right. They are right back on the
internet giving readers more correction and lessons on what
to think.
NOW IT'S HAITI:
Everything goes out of America and the free countries.
Most everything goes into communist countries or nothing
happens at all!
Now disaster takes place in
Haiti. Financially unstable countries then move in to
give humanitarian aid. We're not saying that helping
other countries is bad in this situation of itself alone. We're just making a point
here. The communist countries are always at rest.
None of their leaders are insane spenders.
If America and the free
countries are so different, why does America and the free
countries now want the same NEW WORLD ORDER as the communist
countries always did, having the same minds, but their minds
are so different when it comes to spending and using
resources: Those of the free countries insist on
spending their nations into oblivion, while the Communist
countries are well vaccinated from this treasonous H1N1
disease.
Remember who and what built
Communist China into a massive financial giant. I
lived during the time when China had massive nuclear weapons
and little else in terms of an industrial power. I,
however, remembered even during the days of Ronald Reagan
when China was deemed a most favored nation trading partner
even though she had a very hostile view of FREEDOM and civil
rights. Even after
the massacre at Tiananmen Square
as many of the Chinese
rallied for freedom with the mistaken notion that the United
States would help them to acquire it, were silenced.
These were during the days of George H. W. Bush, Sr. where,
over and over again it didn't matter how much communist
China hated freedom, The FEDS in America WERE DETERMINED THAT
SHE MUST REMAIN ON THE MOST FAVORED NATION TRADING STATUS
and score a major imbalance of trade against the United
States.
With that, she profited handsomely
from many manufactured products sold to the West while
maintaining her workers in depraved conditions. In the
process of time, the horrible wars of GW Bush at the turn of
the century, actually placed America on its financial knees
before China which financed the wars "FOR FREEDOM." Somewhere along the line, Bush and his
massive propaganda team that claims psychiatric talent, felt
it was sane to ask a communist country that hates freedom to
finance wars for it. LO AND BEHOLD, China gladly
agreed to sell her drawers for these wars. We are now
a major debtor to this communist country and the American
people are asleep, not knowing how to comprehend the
situation.
We are not watching the communist
countries. When there are disasters, every other
country goes to throw out their resources. When there
is time for even legitimate wars, it is free countries
that move in to tell the world they themselves must get involved
and can't mind their own business. All the communist
countries can easily mind their business. WHAT IS
GOING ON?
YOU WILL FIND OUT!
It will all fit perfectly into place
even with the Martial Law training exercises that have been
staged in America even well before the 911 attacks.
Foresight that a major crisis might come, makes the
government waste resources to accommodate the closing down
of America instead of using its resources to stop the
anticipated crises. But how can we solve these
anticipated crises when we adopt The Patriot Act which is
embellished with the very security codes and policies these
communist countries always had?
EXACTLY WHAT IS
FASCISM? At least how can we recognize it??
8 years in 8 minutes. The career of former
President GW Bush.
NONE OF THE TRAGEDIES
DESCRIBED HERE WERE DONE BY BUSH ALONE. IT WAS
DONE WITH COOPERATION CLEAR ACROSS THE BOARD IN
WASHINGTON EVEN AND ESPECIALLY
BY THOSE WHO CONDEMNED PRESIDENT
BUSH!
Difficult to describe the career of former President
George Bush and what it has cost America.
Keith Olbermann attempts to do so. Do not
believe that even this rapid overview even
comprehensively tells the tale!
If I said something to people I honestly believed
was true, and, because the information was not
correct, my next door neighbor's son or daughter
died, even though I was honest, I would be in trauma and would not heal from
that disaster in YEARS. I would probably never
work again in my reporting field. A FASCIST, AFTER A
MUCH WORSE DEBACLE, IS
DIFFERENT AND WOULD HAVE DIFFERENT CONCERNS!...
Condoleezza Rice here above has some very pressing
concerns. She says that her integrity is being
"impugned." Why didn't we hear any complaint
from our dead soldiers that their integrity was
"impugned?" It looks to me like they wouldn't
be worried about that right now.
Condoleezza's argument is actually telling us that
THIS CAN ALL HAPPEN AGAIN! Who cares??
She soon found out she was wrong, but didn't care.
The devastation and death with her involvement
sparked no horror nor tear. She even continued
to support the war and the call to "stay the
course." Everyone else was alerting her to her
mistake, but she didn't care about it till she found
that people were about to "impugn" her integrity.
No rage vented from her to the "intelligence"
officials who went "OOPS!" No thought to
punish them. Everyone else must suggest such
things.
He insists that he cannot say that waterboarding is
torture and that he, as a political candidate,
cannot talk about issues like that lest the enemy
finds out the methods America can or cannot use for
security.
LIE: The Army Field manual already tells America
what methods they can and cannot use in
interrogations. Believe it or not, the
terrorists can find out what is in that manual.
NEXT: The Geneva conventions specifically
tells America what methods of interrogations SHE
CANNOT USE!
The argument of Romney is treasonous!! So what
if terrorists find out America's methods? What
if they found out America waterboards detainees?
What are they going to do... GET VACCINATED?
FASCIST! Tancredo approves WATERBOARDING and
confuses the fact that it's torture.
THE TRAGEDY OF JOINING SKULL & BONES! They are
normal human beings, but then when the Skull & Bones
organization puts the symbol on them, they gyrate
and convulse for a couple of minutes, then they
suddenly get calm, then jump up suddenly and shout,
"I GOTTA SAVE INNOCENT LIFE! I gotta protect!"
What is the definition of
torture? Why is it so hard when America was
never confused about this issue before when Middle
Eastern Muslim terrorist, and communists and Nazis
were still around in history?
WHY CAN'T WE UNDERSTAND THAT ONLY FASCISTS
WOULD BE CONFUSED ABOUT THE DEFINITION OF TORTURE
BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS WANT TO EXERCISE IT ON THEIR
ENEMIES? WHY CAN'T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT
ULTIMATELY THEIR GREATEST ENEMIES ARE A FREE
PEOPLE??
HE CONFUSES THE FACT HERE THAT ALL AMERICANS ARE
POTENTIAL DETAINEES ACCORDING TO THE WORDING OF THE
PATRIOT ACT! Why is it such a big deal to keep
Americans safe when the fascist security principles
America now has KEEPS ALL OF THEM IN JEOPARDY??
If his lying desire to protect the American people
was real, he would word the law so that there's no
chance for American citizens to suffer all his
orgies. WHY ARE THEY SO
PARANOID THAT DETAINEES CAN DEFEND THEMSELVES AFTER
BEING ARRESTED AND PROVE THAT THE REAL TERRORISTS
ARE THOSE WHO INCARCERATED THEM? Why do they
determine to believe that the right for them to
defend themselves is against NATIONAL SECURITY?
Remember, only high government leaders
are exempt from the injustice of the Patriot Act.
The wording says they can arbitrarily imprison
anyone then do anything without care that they might be making a mistake.
Propagandists jump all over
you on the internet if you assume anything against
President Bush's character. They tell you that
YOU MUST BE CAREFUL! The same people saw The
Patriot Act and defended it to the hilt!
As an accused, you can't defend yourself. THAT
IS INJUSTICE... THE MAIN INGREDIENT OF
TERRORISM! These are policies already practiced by the
Communists and Nazis.
People are always getting
away with lies! When that kind of age is fully
settled into America, then the most noble, brave and
honest people in America are destined to face a
holocaust!
THAT HOLOCAUST IS ALREADY
NOW TAKING PLACE AGAINST THE MOST CRUCIAL AREA IN
AMERICA THAT DEFENDS HER AGAINST TYRANNY AND
FASCISM: THE MILITARY!
Why was the Bush regime so
bold in treason? Cause it knew all crevices of
government and courts were infiltrated with the same
people and the same fascist mentality. These
same people now sit in the Obama Administration.
The Bush security policies are the beginnings of the
security policies of the NEW WORLD ORDER--An order
President Obama clearly stated he is in favor of.
This regime is all paid for by its victims!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymvj5NURi-Q&feature=channel_page George Galloway sets the record straight, proving there were huge forces
around to prevent war criminals from attacking no-fly-zones for invisible WMDs.
The ones who were wrong have then been very persistent in building detention camps so they can
mentally correct everyone else!
!
Isn't it great Bush did and would have done differently?
Looks like the world is getting more sane, isn't it?
In his speech defending the wars he makes no statement as to
why Osama Bin Laden is still free.
THE VALUE OF THE DOLLAR IS
NOT THE ONLY THING THAT RADICALLY TANKED SINCE OBAMA BECAME
PRESIDENT! THE VALUE OF NOBEL PEACE PRIZES ALSO HIT
WELL SOUTH OF THE BORDER!
Promises, Promises:
A Closed Meeting on Government Openness
President Obama promised to make his presidency and the
government the most transparent ever. Unfortunately
President Obama also sees the need to give fuel to those who
doubt his promises.
PRESIDENT OBAMA
IS DOUBLE-CROSSING US AGAIN,
AFTER THE DEMOCRATS
DOUBLE-CROSSED US TO SUSTAIN THE
WARS AFTER THE 2006 ELECTIONS
AGAINST THOSE WARS!
There are
more troops dying everywhere now
under President Obama than under
President Bush!
Said
liberal
Sen. Bernard Sanders
, a Vermont independent: "My
view is, in the middle of a
severe recession, with 17
percent of our people
unemployed or underemployed,
with one-quarter of the kids
in this country living on
food stamps, I am not
sympathetic to spending $100
million a year on
Afghanistan, plus what we're
spending in
Iraq ."
Republicans
generally gave Obama high marks
for deciding to send 30,000 more
troops.
"If you would have told
me a year into the
president's administration
(that) he would have doubled
our presence in Afghanistan
... plus not reduce our
troops meaningfully in Iraq
... I would have a hard time
believing it,"
Dan Senor, who was a
spokesman for the U.S.-led
coalition in Iraq under
former President George W.
Bush, said in a
conference call arranged by
the
Republican National
Committee.
"So I'm pleasantly
surprised."
Likely Dan Senor doesn't have a
child dying out there suffering
from the new wave of paranoia.
Even our national debt more than
doubled after the tragic Bush
empire just a short time after
President Obama sat in the Oval
office.
"LET'S GIVE HIM A CHANCE!"
Wasn't it great they knew we had
to give GW Bush a chance too?
NO WONDER PRESIDENT OBAMA CAN'T
PROSECUTE THE BUSH TEAM.
The premises used to prosecute
could condemn Obama and his team
as well
for his FUTURE actions
following
the Bush Regime.
The Actual Purpose for the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars!
We have already informed you what President Obama will
decide about the wars. We have already told you what
was the actual purpose of all this over-extension of the
American military with the communist militaries watching,
laughing and preparing. You will notice that we have
been on the mark.
What is the American military like today with its
over-extension all over the globe minding everybody else's
business because Washington keeps telling us the sky is
falling with the "conspiracy theorists" watching and
marveling at their profound PARANOIA?
Now The United States is giving aid to Haiti!
HOW COME THE COMMUNIST NATIONS NEVER HAVE TO MAKE THESE
EXPENDITURES?
WHAT ARE THE COMMUNIST MILITARIES LIKE WITH THEIR LONG
REST FROM MUCH ACTIVITY?
YOU WILL FIND OUT!
THE WORST GLOBAL TERROR IS COMING, and those we trust are
bringing it on. A very small piece of the beginnings
of that terror is now hitting the United States military.
It will become much worse after the "purging" of our
soldiers has completed and our loyal constitutional ones are
sent away where they cannot protect us nor would receive
true information about what would be happening to us half
way around the world away.
But the Lord will protect us, you say? The Lord would
not let anything happen?
Well then why not just listen to the descriptions of the
last days even the Lord gives us so we can see whether or
not the Lord would prevent all this from happening:
18 Woe unto you that desire the day of
the LORD! to what end is it for you? the day of the LORD
is darkness, and not light.
19 As if a man did flee from a lion, and a bear met him;
or went into the house, and leaned his hand on the wall,
and a serpent bit him. -- Amos 5:18, 19
This scripture describing the last days is telling us not
just that the last days will be filled with terror, but that
men will run everywhere to get relief or safety from famine,
pestilence, war, killing or terror but that everywhere they
go will prove to be treacherous. We have shown you on
this website how every avenue of safety is being plugged up.
The same treason going on in government is going on in the
churches. The same is going on in the media, in our
schools and in our forms of entertainment. Where is
the first place you went to when you read about the terrors
documented on this website? Didn't you go to your
church and tell your ministers about it? What did they
tell you? Didn't they tell you that God will protect
you and won't allow America nor the rest of the world to
fall into terror? That's what we're showing you.
The problem of infiltration we're documenting is everywhere.
Lies are everywhere, and good people--EVEN
ON THE PULPITS--are falling for them. Listen to
more descriptions from the Lord Himself documenting the
terrors of the near future:
6 Howl ye; for the day of the LORD is
at hand; it shall come as a destruction from the
Almighty.
7 Therefore shall all hands be faint, and every man's
heart shall melt: -- Isaiah 13:6, 7
The worst global terror is here presented.
People right now don't think about the Lord nor eternity
because there is always something to fall back on. We
have our homes, we trust that we will be fed and have a
place to sleep, etc. The terrors of the future will
erase all of that and death will be absolutely everywhere.
These calamities will bring to remembrance the warnings
predicting the terror they are experiencing and will
reinforce the warnings about what comes after death and will
greatly add to the terror. At that time even atheists'
knees will knock together in fear and they will cry to the
Lord for mercy.
8 And they shall be afraid: pangs and
sorrows shall take hold of them; they shall be in pain
as a woman that travaileth: they shall be amazed one at
another; their faces shall be as flames.
This shows how they
will be TAKEN BY SURPRISE.
9 Behold, the day of the LORD cometh,
cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land
desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out
of it. -- Isaiah 13:8, 9
This is a period just before the Lord
Himself breaks the clouds of heaven. It is this period
we are showing you is being constructed by treachery within
America where her very existence is virtually destroyed by
not one single Muslim face. As part of the
destruction, the sacred record says, as it talks about what
soldiers will do in the near future against the public:
15 Every one that is found shall be
thrust through; and every one that is joined unto them
shall fall by the sword.
16 Their children also shall be dashed to
pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be
spoiled, and their wives ravished [or raped]. --
Isaiah 13:15, 16
Remember the interviews we had on this
website [SAMPLE BELOW]
with treacherous soldiers in our American uniforms and the
propagandists who attacked us for exposing the boldest
public death threats against all non-Catholics? Well
we exposed
the atrocities of the Ustashis of WWII,
and they attacked us for doing that and made us to know that
they thought very highly of the Ustashis.
[Remember that the Ustashis committed
the worst known modern atrocities in order to make their
country (the then Yugoslavia) "100% Catholic" in the 1940s?]
The communist militaries also think very highly of the
Ustashis of WWII. Take note what is described above in
verses 15 and 16. Verses 15 and 16 are describing
actions very similar to the atrocities documented that the
Ustashis of WWII committed as it refers to the terrors of
the last days that will mostly be carried out by soldiers.
Here are more descriptions of the near future to compare
with the atrocities committed by the Ustashis:
17 Behold, I will stir up the Medes
against them, which shall not regard silver; and as for
gold, they shall not delight in it.
18 Their bows also shall dash the young men to
pieces;
and they shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb;
their eye shall not spare children. -- Isaiah 13:17,
18
"Their bows," in
the descriptions, will mean their machine guns and other
such weapons that shoot out projectiles.
That is what is happening now to the US soldiers who would
protect us from tyranny over here as they are being sent
away half way around the world to die.
Again, the Ustashis were uniquely noted for butchering
and torturing children and not sparing them. Is it likely soldiers
will copy the scenes of horror the Ustashis played?
This portion of scripture uses the imagery of the fall of
Babylon as does the book of Revelation for the last days
because the fall even of western society will be very
similar to that of ancient Babylon. Babylon was so
great that her people became cocky and over-confident
actually thinking that it was impossible for her to be
overcome by any other nation.
You think 19 hijackers can destroy America? LO AND
BEHOLD what destroyed her!
"The uniqueness of the Independent Catholic State of Croatia
[with the Ustashis]
lies precisely in this: that it provided a model, in miniature , of what the Catholic Church, had she the power, would like to see in the West and, indeed, everywhere. As such it should be carefully scrutinized. For its significance .... is of greatest import to all the freedom loving peoples of the world."
by Rebecca Sexton -- Former Catholics For Christ
quoting Avro Manhattan from the book, "Catholic Terror Today."
Click here.
Bush supporters challenged the election of President
Obama and said he would not provide CHANGE to
America, but would lead it to destruction. In
this they condemned their President Bush by saying
Obama would lead in the same way. Another
commentator says President Obama has radical
communist beliefs.
Major legendary investor Jim
Rogers not only says that the Obama plan to save the
global economy will fail, he says that it is
literally insane.
Click here. People see that the
markets are up again and therefore conclude that the
Obama plan--handed down to him from former President
Bush--is working. They are also in for a
surprise. The crucial factor that determines
market conditions explained here.
Click here. The WEIMAR [Vaimar]
Republic: A time in Germany before the Nazis took
over that was FORCED to print and spend much more
money than it had. This caused the value of
its currency to crash and brought catastrophic
hardship. President Obama insists on taking
the same course the Weimar Republic took that caused them
tragedy. THE VALUE OF THE DOLLAR AND YOUR
SAVINGS AND RETIREMENT ARE ABOUT TO BE ERASED!
People are urging President Obama
to look at history before he makes any further bad
decisions America has suffered from for eight years
previous. President Obama insists that we must
"LOOK FORWARD" and not take any lessons from the
past. If you object to the bad decisions,
there are FEMA concentration camps waiting for you
in the event of riots and unrest. They seem to
know that they are offending the American people.
THE GREATEST CONSPIRACY THEORY IN THE WORLD LURKED BEHIND
NO-FLY-ZONES AND WAS BEING STAGED BY AN ALREADY DEFEATED
DICTATOR!
CAN WE FIGURE OUT WHERE THE GREATEST
CONSPIRACY THEORISTS ARE?
THE WORST TERRORISTS KNOWN TO MAN EXPOSED
THAT THE US GOVERNMENT MUST IGNORE! BOLDLY AND
PUBLICLY POSTED FOR YEARS! WHY IS WASHINGTON SO
DRAMATICALLY SILENT? SHE IS SEEKING TO DESTROY ONLY
THOSE WHO EXPOSE THESE TERRORISTS!
Why were the Protestants so much different than Rome?...
BOLD PUBLIC DEATH THREATS AGAINST ALL WHO ARE NOT CATHOLIC
POSTED JUST AFTER 911 AND OUR NEW ERA OF TERROR!
POSTED AFTER THE PATRIOT ACT BY FLAGRANT BUSH SUPPORTERS!
The Patriot Act not only did not deter them from making
those threats, but it was that very package of laws that
made them do it boldly and freely.
After we didn't like those
threats of death even against our own lives, a "Seventh-day
Adventist" posting under the name "Andrew," who saw the bold
death threats already for a long time, moved in to
persistently attack us for not liking them. (All over
the internet we are the only ones who attack such threats
and expose the super-terrorists who posted them).
Andrew then said nice words to the super-terrorist who made
the death threats, then he persistently told us we must show
love to every man. He then kept ranting against us and
cursing us, calling us "ranting cyber-demoniacs."
(They are
super-terrorists
because none of even the worst serial killers in America
ever wanted all to be tortured and die merely for not being
Catholic! That's one major reason why the
scriptures spend so much more time in prophecy detailing the
Antichrist than any killer or criminal. When the
Antichrist comes to power it is a constant rule-of-thumb
fact that
holocausts will always engulf where her feet trods,
and she will make God's people be classified as the number
one public enemies everywhere.)
Because of the kindness showed to the super-terrorist who
issued some of the death threats by the Jesuit posing as an
Adventist named "Andrew," the super-terrorist came back,
reiterated all the death threats and emailed the most
unbelievable words of hate, treason and genocide we ever
witnessed since the Inquisitions! He was not concerned
about the new laws against hate and terrorism!
HE KNOWS SOMETHING ABOUT THE
GOVERNMENT AND THE PEOPLE WHO CREATED THESE LAWS FOR
SECURITY THAT ALLOWED HIM TO BECOME SO BOLD!
http://www.theirsecrets.info/ac/appealchapleowest.htm
http://www.theirsecrets.info/ac/appealchapleowest2.htm
We went to a major religious discussion forum that
services all religions in order to show them the bold public
death threats against all who are not Catholic. At the
time we did not know that the owners and moderators were
Catholic or rather
Jesuits.
They then also began a persistent ranting attack upon us for
not liking those death threats. They then kicked us
off the forum.
http://www.theirsecrets.info/ac/appealchapeliefnet.htm
Part
2:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/ac/appealchapintro2.htm
Our Bold Move, showing how we entered into debate with some very strange
people who encouraged all kinds of conflicting debates and classes, AND WON!
These strange people understand what the American citizens do not, about
shocking events soon to overtake them. A strange message from heaven
showing the world there is no excuse for its current confusion, and that
failing to search into end-time prophecies will result in a curse upon all.
Part 3:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/ac/appealchapintro3.htm
Why does the bible curse anyone who refuses to look into the prophecies?
Simple examples from prophecy showing what heaven thinks of the intelligence
of the world today and what actually are the worst global problems few are
noticing.
Part 4:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/patriotact.htm What is the
actual purpose of the Patriot Act.
Strange people in dialogue prove that the actual purpose of the Patriot Act
is directly opposite to the purposes advertised to the world from those who
created and instituted it.
Part 5:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/iraqwar.htm What is the actual purpose
for war. Not just the Iraq war, but virtually every other America has
had. The
bible itself shows that what comes after war is tyranny! A brief
insight to how this takes place.
THE HOLY SCRIPTURES, VS "THE BAD BOYS!" ... A sad,
heart-rending
showing as members of the US military on
forums post EMPHATICALLY how America will lose its honor, strength and
liberty, OVER THEIR DEAD BODIES! All this compared with scripture
which says precisely THAT IT WILL DO JUST THAT!
WHO ARE OUR ENEMIES, THIS TIME!!
Enemies which caused America to beat the war drums and become concerned
about security, came and went!! What happened to them when America
beat them in conflict AND WHEN SHE DID NOT??
HOSTILITY AND WHAT CAUSES IT!...
Why some of our worst enemies which cost us so much and challenged our
very existence, wound up now being called our friends! Important
message about the behavior of our national leaders and current society
that will lead to dangerous and traumatic events in just the near
future!
Part 6:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/ac/appealchapintro6.htm
This page shows that everything that is taking place against American
principle currently is happening because of infiltration into our society by
militant infiltrationist Jesuits. That is a generic term that we use
to identify all the orders of the Papacy that constantly work to acquire
positions in every area of life in our society with the pre-meditated intent
to destroy it and to reinstall the Inquisitions. We reveal some of
their typical tactics here.
A strange and
horrible dilemma and predicament will face the entire globe very soon.
It will bring on the greatest crisis in the history of the earth! This
predicament is coming at lightning speed totally undetected by the world.
The bible itself shows
that what comes after war is tyranny! A brief insight to how this
takes place.
Part 8:
http://www.TheirSecrets.info/majultimatum.htm
A most amazing major future development
will create a great crisis. We look more specifically into what this
crisis will entail on this page. This crisis will cause even God's
people to literally fight with all desperation for their entitlement to the
after-life. This same crisis will cause the rest of the global
population to achieve a terrible accountability of guilt that will force
each one of them to receive a damnation far above even any of the murderers
or serial killers of the 20th century!
Be
vewey, vewey, qwiet! I'm hunting no-fwy-zones!
What
if presidents George Washington to Abraham Lincoln hated
"isolationism" and decided to search the world for WMDs in
their day and correct even one country called Iraq back
then? Would America and freedom be around to this day?
America, much more rich and powerful than back then,
cataclysmically transformed from surplus to bankrupt status
in the space of a mere 8 years under Bush policy
JUST TO CORRECT ONE COUNTRY!
Do you understand that people who are
Americans at heart would realize the mistake?
Destroying the American treasury profiteering
off of the wars against the defeated dictator.
65. Why don't those who struggle to
make sure the American people stop saying there is a
conspiracy do anything against the leaders to make them to
understand that persistent, growing daring and unprecedented suspicious
activity, cover-ups and constitutional tampering will make
people believe there is a conspiracy?
95.
If the Bush propagandists praised GW Bush to the
hilt for allowing 4 planes to devastate America,
would they worship me as a god if I were president
and allowed 5 to do more devastation? Would
they then insist that I must be re-elected or else
other terror attacks can come despite my unique
failure like the Bush propagandists did?
BASKING
IN THE TREASON OF PUBLIC DISTRUST AND DISAPPROVAL!